| Literature DB >> 34755214 |
Viola Camilla Scoffone1, Gabriele Trespidi1, Giulia Barbieri1, Samuele Irudal1, Aygun Israyilova2,3, Silvia Buroni4.
Abstract
Bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia genus are extremely versatile and diverse. They can be environmental isolates, opportunistic pathogens in cystic fibrosis, immunocompromised or chronic granulomatous disease patients, or cause disease in healthy people (e.g., Burkholderia pseudomallei) or animals (as in the case of Burkholderia mallei). Since the genus was separated from the Pseudomonas one in the 1990s, the methodological tools to study and characterize these bacteria are evolving fast. Here we reviewed the techniques used in the last few years to update the taxonomy of the genus, to study gene functions and regulations, to deepen the knowledge on the drug resistance which characterizes these bacteria, and to elucidate their mechanisms to establish infections. The availability of these tools significantly impacts the quality of research on Burkholderia and the choice of the most appropriated is fundamental for a precise characterization of the species of interest.Key points• Updated techniques to study the genus Burkholderia were reviewed.• Taxonomy, genomics, assays, and animal models were described.• A comprehensive overview on recent advances in Burkholderia studies was made.Entities:
Keywords: Animal models; Burkholderia; Genomics; Quorum sensing; Taxonomy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34755214 PMCID: PMC8578011 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11667-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Methods used to describe the taxonomy of the Burkholderia genus
| Method | Accuracy | References |
|---|---|---|
| No distinction within species | Furlan et al. | |
| Selective medium-design algorithm restricted by two constraints | 95% | Haeckl et al., |
| 93.08–100% | Furlan et al. | |
| 91.76–100% | Jin et al. | |
| No distinction within species | Frickmann et al., | |
| Multilocus sequence typing/analysis (MLST/MLSA) | No distinction within species | Jin et al. |
| Raman spectroscopy (RS) | 90–100% | Stöckel et al., |
| Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) | 97–100% | Fergusson et al. |
| Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry multiple reaction monitoring (LC–MS/MS MRM) | 97–100% | Wang et al. |
Fig. 1Schematic diagram depicting the two gene deletion methods in Burkholderia: a gene replacement procedure described by Shastri et al. (2017). A fragment of DNA (≥ 1.0 kb) containing the target gene (or gene fragment) is cloned into a pSHAFT vector and then disrupted by insertion of an antibiotic resistance cassette, ensuring there is at least 0.5 kb of homology between the cloned DNA target region and the chromosome on either side of the cassette. The pSHAFT-derived construct is transferred into bacteria, double crossover recombinants are selected based on their resistance to the antibiotic specified by the antibiotic resistance cassette, and either sensitivity to chloramphenicol; b the gene replacement procedure described by Flannagan et al. (2008). The suicide vector pGPI-SceI-XCm contains regions of homology flanking the target gene in purple (UpR, green and DwR, blue). The vector is transferred into bacteria by conjugation and integrated into the chromosome by the first homologous recombination event, resulting in trimethoprim and chloramphenicol resistant merodiploids. The pDAI-SceI-SacB is transferred into the merodiploid by conjugation. The I-SceI endonuclease expressed from the plasmid introduces a double-stranded DNA break at the I-SceI recognition site on the chromosome (in red). The DNA break stimulates the second homologous recombination event through the host DNA repair system. Depending on the location of the second recombination event, the resolution of the merodiploid state either restores the wild-type allele or generates the desired gene deletion. (Created with BioRender.com)
Methods used to study QS systems in Burkholderia spp
| Methods | Aim | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AHLs detection | Veselova et al. | ||
| AHLs detection | Veselova et al. | ||
| DSFs detection | Cui et al. | ||
| QS-regulated genes transcription studies | Yang et al. | ||
| Luciferase and GFP transcriptional fusions | Bcc species; | DFSs detection and QS-regulated genes transcription studies | Suppiger et al. |
| LC–MS/MS | AHLs and BDSF quantification | Chapalain et al. | |
| DCPIP enzymatic assay and nondenaturing gel electrophoresis | Determination of CepI and DfsA (RpfFBc) catalytic activity | Spadaro et al. |