Literature DB >> 30295658

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake.

Alice Meroni1, Nyssa Jualim1, Nicholas Fuller2.   

Abstract

Different methods can be used in research to assess dietary intake, many of which are still paper-based. Written estimated food diaries are often utilized in clinical trials, despite being a burden for both study participants and researchers. This method requires participant literacy, it is time consuming, labor intensive, and can easily lead to under-reporting. With advancements in technology, there is a growing interest in electronic diaries that automate the dietary assessment process. These are focused on improving accuracy, reducing both time and cost and providing users with a visual and more enjoyable experience. The methodology presented here aimed to validate the 'Boden Food Plate', a novel web-based platform for self-recording of food and drink items, compared to a traditional estimated food diary. The application was also rated on a satisfaction scale by study participants using a paper-based questionnaire. Sixty-seven participants completed the dietary measures on both the three-day electronic and paper food diaries. For the analysis, only dietary data completed at both study time points (baseline and week six) was utilized. Despite small mean differences between dietary data collection methods, Bland Altman analysis showed fairly wide 95% limits of agreement between the electronic platform and the written estimated food diary and there were few cases which did not fall within the 95% confidence intervals. Overall, participants found the electronic food diary to be more fun than the paper method and as easy to use as hard copy diaries. The new platform has potential as a self-recording tool for the collection of dietary data, particularly when utilized in clinical trial settings. However, further validation studies are needed to improve the validity of this novel electronic dietary data collection tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295658      PMCID: PMC6235195          DOI: 10.3791/57923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 2.  Dietary intake--how do we measure what people are really eating?

Authors:  Rachel K Johnson
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2002-11

3.  Comparison of an electronic versus traditional food diary for assessing dietary intake-A validation study.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuller; Mackenzie Fong; James Gerofi; Fatima Ferkh; Chloris Leung; Lisa Leung; Shaoyu Zhang; Michael Skilton; Ian D Caterson
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 4.  Feasibility and validity of mobile phones to assess dietary intake.

Authors:  Darren B Sharp; Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.008

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake.

Authors:  A E Black; A M Prentice; G R Goldberg; S A Jebb; S A Bingham; M B Livingstone; W A Coward
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1993-05

7.  The emerging role of electronic diaries in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nicole L Kerkenbush; Caterina E M Lasome
Journal:  AACN Clin Issues       Date:  2003-08

8.  'My Meal Mate' (MMM): validation of the diet measures captured on a smartphone application to facilitate weight loss.

Authors:  Michelle C Carter; V J Burley; C Nykjaer; J E Cade
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Use of electronic dietary assessment tools in primary care: an interdisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Paula Brauer; Dawna Royall; Heather Keller; Rhona M Hanning; Alba DiCenso
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michelle Clare Carter; Victoria Jane Burley; Camilla Nykjaer; Janet Elizabeth Cade
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.