Literature DB >> 36117944

Examining the dynamic nature of epiphytic microalgae in the Florida Keys: What factors influence community composition?

Elena Stanca1,2, Michael L Parsons1.   

Abstract

The factors that influence the composition of marine epiphytic microalgal assemblages are poorly-understood. To address this short-coming, 93 samples were collected from four distinct regions in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) during winter and summer months to test the model that epiphytic microalgal communities are influenced by environmental gradients related to different sites, seasons, and host macrophyte species. One hundred and eighty-three morphotypes from 13 classes (7 phyla) were identified, dominated by 106 Bacillariophyta (77 identified to species equivalent or below), 37 Cyanophyta (13 identified to species equivalent or below), and 30 Dinophyta (21 identified to species equivalent or below). The largest proportion of variability in epiphytic communities was related to physico-chemical parameters (37%), followed by site location (ocean-versus bayside; 15%), seasonal differences (11%), and host macrophyte species (10%). Four physico-chemical variables were found to be most influential: wave height, temperature, ammonium concentration, and salinity. Only six out of 616 epiphyte - host comparisons exhibited significant differences in individual epiphyte taxon abundance between different host species (within site and season), further demonstrating that host-specificity was not strongly evident in this study. Overall, the results of this (sub)tropical study indicate that changing environmental characteristics between sites and seasons were the primary drivers influencing epiphyte community composition. Similar findings were found in an accompanying study of phytoplankton and other studies from temperate and (sub)polar regions, suggesting that common, underlying processes exist among these disparate environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benthic microalgae; Epiphytes; Florida Keys; Macroalgae; Seagrass

Year:  2021        PMID: 36117944      PMCID: PMC9481181          DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Mar Biol Ecol        ISSN: 0022-0981            Impact factor:   2.476


  6 in total

1.  Quantifying and modelling the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrass meadows--a critical assessment.

Authors:  P I Macreadie; M E Baird; S M Trevathan-Tackett; A W D Larkum; P J Ralph
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Development of an epiphyte indicator of nutrient enrichment: threshold values for seagrass epiphyte load.

Authors:  Walter G Nelson
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.958

3.  Flow and epiphyte growth effects on the thermal, optical and chemical microenvironment in the leaf phyllosphere of seagrass (Zostera marina).

Authors:  Fanny Noisette; Anna Depetris; Michael Kühl; Kasper Elgetti Brodersen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  NUTRIENT EFFECTS ON SEAGRASS EPIPHYTE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN FLORIDA BAY(1).

Authors:  Thomas A Frankovich; Anna R Armitage; Ania H Wachnicka; Evelyn E Gaiser; James W Fourqurean
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.923

5.  Assessing the use of artificial substrates to monitor Gambierdiscus populations in the Florida Keys.

Authors:  Michael L Parsons; Ashley L Brandt; Amanda Ellsworth; Alex K Leynse; Lacey K Rains; Donald M Anderson
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.273

6.  Summer Epiphytic Diatoms from Terra Nova Bay and Cape Evans (Ross Sea, Antarctica)--A Synthesis and Final Conclusions.

Authors:  Roksana Majewska; Peter Convey; Mario De Stefano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.