Literature DB >> 30293786

Genome-wide Identification of Structure-Forming Repeats as Principal Sites of Fork Collapse upon ATR Inhibition.

Nishita Shastri1, Yu-Chen Tsai1, Suzanne Hile2, Deondre Jordan3, Barrett Powell3, Jessica Chen3, Dillon Maloney1, Marei Dose4, Yancy Lo5, Theonie Anastassiadis1, Osvaldo Rivera1, Taehyong Kim5, Sharvin Shah1, Piyush Borole1, Kanika Asija1, Xiang Wang1, Kevin D Smith1, Darren Finn1, Jonathan Schug6, Rafael Casellas4, Liliya A Yatsunyk3, Kristin A Eckert2, Eric J Brown7.   

Abstract

DNA polymerase stalling activates the ATR checkpoint kinase, which in turn suppresses fork collapse and breakage. Herein, we describe use of ATR inhibition (ATRi) as a means to identify genomic sites of problematic DNA replication in murine and human cells. Over 500 high-resolution ATR-dependent sites were ascertained using two distinct methods: replication protein A (RPA)-chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and breaks identified by TdT labeling (BrITL). The genomic feature most strongly associated with ATR dependence was repetitive DNA that exhibited high structure-forming potential. Repeats most reliant on ATR for stability included structure-forming microsatellites, inverted retroelement repeats, and quasi-palindromic AT-rich repeats. Notably, these distinct categories of repeats differed in the structures they formed and their ability to stimulate RPA accumulation and breakage, implying that the causes and character of replication fork collapse under ATR inhibition can vary in a DNA-structure-specific manner. Collectively, these studies identify key sources of endogenous replication stress that rely on ATR for stability.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AT-rich; ATR; DNA damage; DNA double-strand breaks; RPA; hairpin; inverted repeats; microsatellite; replication fork collapse; short tandem repeats

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293786      PMCID: PMC6407864          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  59 in total

1.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome.

Authors:  Joshua C Saldivar; David Cortez; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Fragile sites in cancer: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Thomas W Glover; Thomas E Wilson; Martin F Arlt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Common chromosome fragile sites in human and murine epithelial cells and FHIT/FRA3B loss-induced global genome instability.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hosseini; Susan Horton; Joshua C Saldivar; Satoshi Miuma; Martha R Stampfer; Nyla A Heerema; Kay Huebner
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Feng Yue; Yong Cheng; Alessandra Breschi; Jeff Vierstra; Weisheng Wu; Tyrone Ryba; Richard Sandstrom; Zhihai Ma; Carrie Davis; Benjamin D Pope; Yin Shen; Dmitri D Pervouchine; Sarah Djebali; Robert E Thurman; Rajinder Kaul; Eric Rynes; Anthony Kirilusha; Georgi K Marinov; Brian A Williams; Diane Trout; Henry Amrhein; Katherine Fisher-Aylor; Igor Antoshechkin; Gilberto DeSalvo; Lei-Hoon See; Meagan Fastuca; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Alex Dobin; Pablo Prieto; Julien Lagarde; Giovanni Bussotti; Andrea Tanzer; Olgert Denas; Kanwei Li; M A Bender; Miaohua Zhang; Rachel Byron; Mark T Groudine; David McCleary; Long Pham; Zhen Ye; Samantha Kuan; Lee Edsall; Yi-Chieh Wu; Matthew D Rasmussen; Mukul S Bansal; Manolis Kellis; Cheryl A Keller; Christapher S Morrissey; Tejaswini Mishra; Deepti Jain; Nergiz Dogan; Robert S Harris; Philip Cayting; Trupti Kawli; Alan P Boyle; Ghia Euskirchen; Anshul Kundaje; Shin Lin; Yiing Lin; Camden Jansen; Venkat S Malladi; Melissa S Cline; Drew T Erickson; Vanessa M Kirkup; Katrina Learned; Cricket A Sloan; Kate R Rosenbloom; Beatriz Lacerda de Sousa; Kathryn Beal; Miguel Pignatelli; Paul Flicek; Jin Lian; Tamer Kahveci; Dongwon Lee; W James Kent; Miguel Ramalho Santos; Javier Herrero; Cedric Notredame; Audra Johnson; Shinny Vong; Kristen Lee; Daniel Bates; Fidencio Neri; Morgan Diegel; Theresa Canfield; Peter J Sabo; Matthew S Wilken; Thomas A Reh; Erika Giste; Anthony Shafer; Tanya Kutyavin; Eric Haugen; Douglas Dunn; Alex P Reynolds; Shane Neph; Richard Humbert; R Scott Hansen; Marella De Bruijn; Licia Selleri; Alexander Rudensky; Steven Josefowicz; Robert Samstein; Evan E Eichler; Stuart H Orkin; Dana Levasseur; Thalia Papayannopoulou; Kai-Hsin Chang; Arthur Skoultchi; Srikanta Gosh; Christine Disteche; Piper Treuting; Yanli Wang; Mitchell J Weiss; Gerd A Blobel; Xiaoyi Cao; Sheng Zhong; Ting Wang; Peter J Good; Rebecca F Lowdon; Leslie B Adams; Xiao-Qiao Zhou; Michael J Pazin; Elise A Feingold; Barbara Wold; James Taylor; Ali Mortazavi; Sherman M Weissman; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Michael P Snyder; Roderic Guigo; Thomas R Gingeras; David M Gilbert; Ross C Hardison; Michael A Beer; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Translocation and deletion breakpoints in cancer genomes are associated with potential non-B DNA-forming sequences.

Authors:  Albino Bacolla; John A Tainer; Karen M Vasquez; David N Cooper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Normalization of ChIP-seq data with control.

Authors:  Kun Liang; Sündüz Keleş
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  DNA polymerase kappa produces interrupted mutations and displays polar pausing within mononucleotide microsatellite sequences.

Authors:  Suzanne E Hile; Kristin A Eckert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  DNA replication stress, genome instability and aging.

Authors:  William C Burhans; Martin Weinberger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  ATR protects the genome against CGG.CCG-repeat expansion in Fragile X premutation mice.

Authors:  Ali Entezam; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops.

Authors:  Josh Lawrimore; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  RBMX is required for activation of ATR on repetitive DNAs to maintain genome stability.

Authors:  Tian Zheng; Haoxian Zhou; Xiaocui Li; Di Peng; Yiding Yang; Yanru Zeng; Haiying Liu; Jian Ren; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  ATR inhibition potentiates ionizing radiation-induced interferon response via cytosolic nucleic acid-sensing pathways.

Authors:  Xu Feng; Anthony Tubbs; Chunchao Zhang; Mengfan Tang; Sriram Sridharan; Chao Wang; Dadi Jiang; Dan Su; Huimin Zhang; Zhen Chen; Litong Nie; Yun Xiong; Min Huang; André Nussenzweig; Junjie Chen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  High-resolution, ultrasensitive and quantitative DNA double-strand break labeling in eukaryotic cells using i-BLESS.

Authors:  Anna Biernacka; Magdalena Skrzypczak; Yingjie Zhu; Philippe Pasero; Maga Rowicka; Krzysztof Ginalski
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Non-canonical DNA/RNA structures during Transcription-Coupled Double-Strand Break Repair: Roadblocks or Bona fide repair intermediates?

Authors:  Nadine Puget; Kyle M Miller; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

7.  Replication stress at microsatellites causes DNA double-strand breaks and break-induced replication.

Authors:  Rujuta Yashodhan Gadgil; Eric J Romer; Caitlin C Goodman; S Dean Rider; French J Damewood; Joanna R Barthelemy; Kazuo Shin-Ya; Helmut Hanenberg; Michael Leffak
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Non-B DNA: a major contributor to small- and large-scale variation in nucleotide substitution frequencies across the genome.

Authors:  Wilfried M Guiblet; Marzia A Cremona; Robert S Harris; Di Chen; Kristin A Eckert; Francesca Chiaromonte; Yi-Fei Huang; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Structure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability.

Authors:  Rebecca E Brown; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe KAT5 contributes to resection and repair of a DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Tingting Li; Ruben C Petreaca; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.