Kimberly M Nelson1, David W Pantalone2, Michael P Carey3. 1. Centers for Behavioral and Preventative Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Rhode Island; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island. Electronic address: kimberly_nelson_1@brown.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts; The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Massachusetts; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Rhode Island. 3. Centers for Behavioral and Preventative Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Rhode Island; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a dearth of research to inform sexual education programs to address sexual health disparities experienced by adolescent males who are interested in sex with males (AMSM). The current study sought to determine where AMSM receive sexual health information, clarify their preferences, and explore relations with sexual behavior. METHODS: AMSM (N = 207; ages 14-17) in the United States completed an online sexual health survey. Bivariate associations between sexual education exposure/preferences by sexual behavior were assessed using Fisher's exact tests and one-way analyses of variance. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (43%) participants reported no sexual contact with male partners, 77 (37%) reported sexual contact without condomless anal sex, and 41 (20%) reported condomless anal sex. Participants received sexual health information from their parents/guardians (n = 122, 59%), formal sources (n = 160, 78%), and the Internet (n = 135, 65%). The most commonly covered topics by parents/guardians and formal sources were how to say no to sex, how to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and methods of birth control. The most common online-researched topics were how to safely have anal sex, the types of sex you can have with a male partner, how to use a condom, and how to use lubrication. Participants noted preferring a sexually-explicit online sexual health program that addresses male-male sex. CONCLUSIONS: Online sexual education programs that explicitly address male-male sex are needed. Tailored programs can help AMSM develop healthy sexual behaviors and decrease their HIV/STI risk.
PURPOSE: There is a dearth of research to inform sexual education programs to address sexual health disparities experienced by adolescent males who are interested in sex with males (AMSM). The current study sought to determine where AMSM receive sexual health information, clarify their preferences, and explore relations with sexual behavior. METHODS: AMSM (N = 207; ages 14-17) in the United States completed an online sexual health survey. Bivariate associations between sexual education exposure/preferences by sexual behavior were assessed using Fisher's exact tests and one-way analyses of variance. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (43%) participants reported no sexual contact with male partners, 77 (37%) reported sexual contact without condomless anal sex, and 41 (20%) reported condomless anal sex. Participants received sexual health information from their parents/guardians (n = 122, 59%), formal sources (n = 160, 78%), and the Internet (n = 135, 65%). The most commonly covered topics by parents/guardians and formal sources were how to say no to sex, how to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and methods of birth control. The most common online-researched topics were how to safely have anal sex, the types of sex you can have with a male partner, how to use a condom, and how to use lubrication. Participants noted preferring a sexually-explicit online sexual health program that addresses male-male sex. CONCLUSIONS: Online sexual education programs that explicitly address male-male sex are needed. Tailored programs can help AMSM develop healthy sexual behaviors and decrease their HIV/STI risk.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Michelle M Johns; Nicole Liddon; Paula E Jayne; Oscar Beltran; Riley J Steiner; Elana Morris Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Laura Kann; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Tim McManus; William A Harris; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Barbara Queen; Richard Lowry; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Jemekia Thornton; Connie Lim; Yoshimi Yamakawa; Nancy Brener; Stephanie Zaza Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2016-08-12
Authors: Bryan A Kutner; Nicholas S Perry; Claire Stout; Andrea Norcini Pala; Christian D Paredes; Kimberly M Nelson Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.937
Authors: Dalmacio D Flores; Steven P Meanley; Keosha T Bond; Madina Agenor; Michael V Relf; Julie V Barroso Journal: Behav Med Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.879
Authors: Kimberly M Nelson; Nicholas S Perry; Claire D Stout; Michael P Carey Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.771