Christian Grov1,2, Drew Westmoreland2, H Jonathon Rendina3,4, Denis Nash2,5. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY. 2. CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, NY. 3. Department of Psychology, Hunter College of CUNY, PRIDE Health Research Consortium, New York, NY. 4. PRIDE Health Research Consortium, Hunter College of CUNY, New York, NY. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2014, Grov et al published a comprehensive review cataloguing both men who have sex with men's (MSM's) sexual behavior transitions in online environments from the 1990s through 2013, as well as researchers' efforts in tandem to use the internet to engage MSM into research, treatment, and prevention. METHODS: In this article, we discuss historical events and research having occurred in the half decade since the Grov et al publication. RESULTS: Notable transitions include MSM's expanded use of geosocial networking apps, as well as other forms of social media accessed primarily through mobile devices, as well as the addition of biomedical prevention strategies (eg, pre-exposure prophylaxis and undetectable = untransmittable) to the proverbial HIV prevention toolkit. In tandem, researchers have rapidly expanded their employment of internet-mediated methods for the recruitment and engagement of key populations for HIV research, treatment, and prevention. In this article, we discuss methodological considerations for using the internet to conduct HIV prevention research with MSM: (1) sources of recruitment (eg, geosocial apps, Facebook, crowdsourced online panels); (2) design (eg, cross sectional, longitudinal, diaries); (3) incentives (including disincentivizing fraudulent participants and/or spam bots); (4) confidentiality; and (5) representativeness. CONCLUSION: We conclude by discussing future directions in HIV prevention research in light of forthcoming technologies such as fifth generation (5G) mobile networks, combined use of self-collected biological data alongside self-report, and the utility of metadata and metaresearch to document, evaluate, and inform best practices.
BACKGROUND: In 2014, Grov et al published a comprehensive review cataloguing both men who have sex with men's (MSM's) sexual behavior transitions in online environments from the 1990s through 2013, as well as researchers' efforts in tandem to use the internet to engage MSM into research, treatment, and prevention. METHODS: In this article, we discuss historical events and research having occurred in the half decade since the Grov et al publication. RESULTS: Notable transitions include MSM's expanded use of geosocial networking apps, as well as other forms of social media accessed primarily through mobile devices, as well as the addition of biomedical prevention strategies (eg, pre-exposure prophylaxis and undetectable = untransmittable) to the proverbial HIV prevention toolkit. In tandem, researchers have rapidly expanded their employment of internet-mediated methods for the recruitment and engagement of key populations for HIV research, treatment, and prevention. In this article, we discuss methodological considerations for using the internet to conduct HIV prevention research with MSM: (1) sources of recruitment (eg, geosocial apps, Facebook, crowdsourced online panels); (2) design (eg, cross sectional, longitudinal, diaries); (3) incentives (including disincentivizing fraudulent participants and/or spam bots); (4) confidentiality; and (5) representativeness. CONCLUSION: We conclude by discussing future directions in HIV prevention research in light of forthcoming technologies such as fifth generation (5G) mobile networks, combined use of self-collected biological data alongside self-report, and the utility of metadata and metaresearch to document, evaluate, and inform best practices.
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Kathryn E Muessig; Emily C Pike; Sara LeGrand; Nina Baltierra; Alvin Justin Rucker; Patrick Wilson Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2015-01-14
Authors: Nancy S Padian; Sandra I McCoy; Salim S Abdool Karim; Nina Hasen; Julia Kim; Michael Bartos; Elly Katabira; Stefano M Bertozzi; Bernhard Schwartländer; Myron S Cohen Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Catherine E Oldenburg; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Douglas Krakower; David S Novak; Matthew J Mimiaga; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jeffrey T Parsons; H Jonathon Rendina; Christian Grov; Ana Ventuneac; Brian Mustanski Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Sean D Young; Ian Holloway; Devan Jaganath; Eric Rice; Drew Westmoreland; Thomas Coates Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Katja Reuter; Praveen Angyan; NamQuyen Le; Alicia MacLennan; Sarah Cole; Ricky N Bluthenthal; Christianne J Lane; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Thomas A Buchanan Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-09-25
Authors: Maria Zlotorzynska; José A Bauermeister; Jesse M Golinkoff; Willey Lin; Travis H Sanchez; Lisa Hightow-Weidman Journal: Mhealth Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Étienne Meunier; Anne E Sundelson; Stephen Tellone; Daniel Alohan; Celia B Fisher; Christian Grov Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Alexa B D'Angelo; Corey A Morrison; Javier Lopez-Rios; Caitlin J MacCrate; David W Pantalone; Matthew Stief; Christian Grov Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-03
Authors: Elizabeth Fearon; Adam Bourne; Siyanda Tenza; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Rhoda Kabuti; Peter Weatherburn; Will Nutland; Joshua Kimani; Adrian D Smith Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Pablo Mangas; Reina Granados; Oscar Cervilla; Juan Carlos Sierra Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.390