Literature DB >> 30288227

Lipophilicity prediction of peptides and peptide derivatives by consensus machine learning.

Jens-Alexander Fuchs1, Francesca Grisoni1,2, Michael Kossenjans3, Jan A Hiss1, Gisbert Schneider1.   

Abstract

Lipophilicity prediction is routinely applied to small molecules and presents a working alternative to experimental log P or log D determination. For compounds outside the domain of classical medicinal chemistry these predictions lack accuracy, advocating the development of bespoke in silico approaches. Peptides and their derivatives and mimetics fill the structural gap between small synthetic drugs and genetically engineered macromolecules. Here, we present a data-driven machine learning method for peptide log D 7.4 prediction. A model for estimating the lipophilicity of short linear peptides consisting of natural amino acids was developed. In a prospective test, we obtained accurate predictions for a set of newly synthesized linear tri- to hexapeptides. Further model development focused on more complex peptide mimetics from the AstraZeneca compound collection. The results obtained demonstrate the applicability of the new prediction model to peptides and peptide derivatives in a log D 7.4 range of approximately -3 to 5, with superior accuracy to established lipophilicity models for small molecules.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30288227      PMCID: PMC6151477          DOI: 10.1039/c8md00370j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medchemcomm        ISSN: 2040-2503            Impact factor:   3.597


  26 in total

Review 1.  Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function.

Authors:  Christopher D Fjell; Jan A Hiss; Robert E W Hancock; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  The influence of peptide structure on transport across Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  R A Conradi; A R Hilgers; N F Ho; P S Burton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Calculation of molecular lipophilicity: State-of-the-art and comparison of log P methods on more than 96,000 compounds.

Authors:  Raimund Mannhold; Gennadiy I Poda; Claude Ostermann; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Analysis of the calculated physicochemical properties of respiratory drugs: can we design for inhaled drugs yet?

Authors:  Timothy J Ritchie; Christopher N Luscombe; Simon J F Macdonald
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Keld Fosgerau; Torsten Hoffmann
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 6.  The future of peptide-based drugs.

Authors:  David J Craik; David P Fairlie; Spiros Liras; David Price
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.817

Review 7.  Oral Administration of Peptide-Based Drugs: Beyond Lipinski's Rule.

Authors:  Gabriela B Santos; A Ganesan; Flavio S Emery
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Quantifying the chameleonic properties of macrocycles and other high-molecular-weight drugs.

Authors:  Adrian Whitty; Mengqi Zhong; Lauren Viarengo; Dmitri Beglov; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 6. Can oral bioavailability in humans be effectively predicted by simple molecular property-based rules?

Authors:  Tingjun Hou; Junmei Wang; Wei Zhang; Xiaojie Xu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  The effect of beta-turn structure on the passive diffusion of peptides across Caco-2 cell monolayers.

Authors:  G T Knipp; D G Vander Velde; T J Siahaan; R T Borchardt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Development of Anticancer Peptides Using Artificial Intelligence and Combinational Therapy for Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ji Su Hwang; Seok Gi Kim; Tae Hwan Shin; Yong Eun Jang; Do Hyeon Kwon; Gwang Lee
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 2.  Deep Learning for Deep Chemistry: Optimizing the Prediction of Chemical Patterns.

Authors:  Tânia F G G Cova; Alberto A C C Pais
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.221

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.