Literature DB >> 15280188

Awareness of breast cancer genetics and interest in predictive genetic testing: a survey of a southern Italian population.

M Bruno1, S Tommasi, B Stea, M Quaranta, F Schittulli, A Mastropasqua, A Distante, L Di Paola, A Paradiso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Before starting a molecular screening program for breast cancer risk and in order to develop ad hoc educational strategies, a population survey in Apulia, Italy, was performed to gather information on women's awareness of breast cancer genetics and their attitude toward genetic testing for breast cancer risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 677 healthy women with or without a family history of breast cancer, who attended the outpatient clinics of Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori in Bari, Italy, for preventive visits, were asked to complete a 20-item questionnaire on socio-demographics, risk perception, psychological characteristics and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer predisposing genes.
RESULTS: Most women (77%) reported knowing something about the genetics of breast cancer; only 7% of the women were not interested at all in genetic testing. These figures were not significantly different for women with or without a family history of breast cancer. The two most frequently cited reasons for being interested in genetic testing, accounting for more than 50% of collected responses, were 'to learn about your children's risk' and 'to help advance research'. On multiple logistic regression analysis, only older age [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.9] was associated with women's knowledge of genetic testing. Moreover, marital status (OR 4.0; 95% CI 1.1-14.6) and thinking of cancer (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0-4.7) independently predicted the interest in having genetic testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Southern Italian women seem highly interested in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. However, their expectations mainly regard their concerns about their children or their altruistic need to help research rather than the idea of a direct clinical benefit. The great interest of the women in genetic testing probably reflects their inappropriate knowledge of the information that genetic testing can provide for breast cancer risk analysis. Copyright 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15280188     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  8 in total

1.  Presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults: a survey of young adults and parents.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.

Authors:  Samuel O Ngene; Babatunde Adedokun; Prisca Adejumo; Olufunmilayo Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  The withdrawal from oncogenetic counselling and testing for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. A descriptive study of an Italian sample.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Gabriella Maggi; Fabio Massimo Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-24

5.  Making the decision to participate in predictive genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Katherine M James; Pamela S Sinicrope; David T Eton; Brian A Costello; Jantey Carey; Melanie A Lane; Shawna L Ehlers; Patricia J Erwin; Katherine E Nowakowski; Mohammad H Murad
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Health Orientation, Knowledge, and Attitudes toward Genetic Testing and Personalized Genomic Services: Preliminary Data from an Italian Sample.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Marianna Masiero; Paola Arnaboldi; Ilaria Cutica; Chiara Fioretti; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  "Sequencing-grade" screening for BRCA1 variants by oligo-arrays.

Authors:  Alessandro Monaco; Filippo Menolascina; Yingdong Zhao; Stefania Tommasi; Marianna Sabatino; Ross Fasano; Angelo Paradiso; Francesco M Marincola; Ena Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.