Lara Pivodic1, Tinne Smets1, Nele Van den Noortgate2, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen3, Yvonne Engels4, Katarzyna Szczerbińska5, Harriet Finne-Soveri6, Katherine Froggatt7, Giovanni Gambassi8,9, Luc Deliens1, Lieve Van den Block1. 1. 1 End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels and Ghent, Belgium. 2. 2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 3. 3 EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. 4 Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. 5 Unit for Research on Aging Society, Department of Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland. 6. 6 National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. 7. 7 International Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. 8. 8 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 9. 9 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nursing homes are among the most common places of death in many countries. AIM: To determine the quality of dying and end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six European countries. DESIGN: Epidemiological survey in a proportionally stratified random sample of nursing homes. We identified all deaths of residents of the preceding 3-month period. Main outcomes: quality of dying in the last week of life (measured using End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying (EOLD-CAD)); quality of end-of-life care in the last month of life (measured using Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care (QoD-LTC) scale). Higher scores indicate better quality. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and twenty-two nursing homes in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and England. Participants were staff (nurses or care assistants) most involved in each resident's care. RESULTS: Staff returned questionnaires regarding 1384 (81.6%) of 1696 deceased residents. The End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying mean score (95% confidence interval) (theoretical 14-42) ranged from 29.9 (27.6; 32.2) in Italy to 33.9 (31.5; 36.3) in England. The Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care mean score (95% confidence interval) (theoretical 11-55) ranged from 35.0 (31.8; 38.3) in Italy to 44.1 (40.7; 47.4) in England. A higher End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying score was associated with country ( p = 0.027), older age ( p = 0.012), length of stay ⩾1 year ( p = 0.034), higher functional status ( p < 0.001). A higher Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care score was associated with country ( p < 0.001), older age ( p < 0.001), length of stay ⩾1 year ( p < 0.001), higher functional status ( p = 0.002), absence of dementia ( p = 0.001), death in nursing home ( p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: The quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care in nursing homes in the countries studied are not optimal. This includes countries with high levels of palliative care development in nursing homes such as Belgium, the Netherlands and England.
BACKGROUND: Nursing homes are among the most common places of death in many countries. AIM: To determine the quality of dying and end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six European countries. DESIGN: Epidemiological survey in a proportionally stratified random sample of nursing homes. We identified all deaths of residents of the preceding 3-month period. Main outcomes: quality of dying in the last week of life (measured using End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying (EOLD-CAD)); quality of end-of-life care in the last month of life (measured using Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care (QoD-LTC) scale). Higher scores indicate better quality. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and twenty-two nursing homes in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and England. Participants were staff (nurses or care assistants) most involved in each resident's care. RESULTS: Staff returned questionnaires regarding 1384 (81.6%) of 1696 deceased residents. The End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying mean score (95% confidence interval) (theoretical 14-42) ranged from 29.9 (27.6; 32.2) in Italy to 33.9 (31.5; 36.3) in England. The Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care mean score (95% confidence interval) (theoretical 11-55) ranged from 35.0 (31.8; 38.3) in Italy to 44.1 (40.7; 47.4) in England. A higher End-of-Life in Dementia Scales - Comfort Assessment while Dying score was associated with country ( p = 0.027), older age ( p = 0.012), length of stay ⩾1 year ( p = 0.034), higher functional status ( p < 0.001). A higher Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care score was associated with country ( p < 0.001), older age ( p < 0.001), length of stay ⩾1 year ( p < 0.001), higher functional status ( p = 0.002), absence of dementia ( p = 0.001), death in nursing home ( p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: The quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care in nursing homes in the countries studied are not optimal. This includes countries with high levels of palliative care development in nursing homes such as Belgium, the Netherlands and England.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nursing home; epidemiologic research design; palliative care; quality of health care; terminal care
Authors: Jean C Munn; Sheryl Zimmerman; Laura C Hanson; Christianna S Williams; Philip D Sloane; Elizabeth C Clipp; James A Tulsky; Karen E Steinhauser Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Angela M Sanford; Martin Orrell; Debbie Tolson; Angela Marie Abbatecola; Hidenori Arai; Juergen M Bauer; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Birong Dong; Hyuk Ga; Ashish Goel; Ramzi Hajjar; Iva Holmerova; Paul R Katz; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Yves Rolland; Renuka Visvanathan; Jean Woo; John E Morley; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Nicole van Uden; Lieve Van den Block; Jenny T van der Steen; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; An Vandervoort; Robert Vander Stichele; Luc Deliens Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Francisca Galindo-Garre; Simone A Hendriks; Ladislav Volicer; Martin Smalbrugge; Cees M P M Hertogh; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Graziano Onder; Iain Carpenter; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Jacob Gindin; Dinnus Frijters; Jean Claude Henrard; Thorsten Nikolaus; Eva Topinkova; Matteo Tosato; Rosa Liperoti; Francesco Landi; Roberto Bernabei Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anna E Bone; Barbara Gomes; Simon N Etkind; Julia Verne; Fliss E M Murtagh; Catherine J Evans; Irene J Higginson Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Lieve Van den Block; Elisabeth Honinx; Lara Pivodic; Rose Miranda; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Hein van Hout; H Roeline W Pasman; Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug; Maud Ten Koppel; Ruth Piers; Nele Van Den Noortgate; Yvonne Engels; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Jo Hockley; Katherine Froggatt; Sheila Payne; Katarzyna Szczerbinska; Marika Kylänen; Giovanni Gambassi; Sophie Pautex; Catherine Bassal; Stefanie De Buysser; Luc Deliens; Tinne Smets Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Mary Ersek; Kathleen T Unroe; Joan G Carpenter; John G Cagle; Caroline E Stephens; David G Stevenson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Danni Collingridge Moore; Sheila Payne; Lieve Van den Block; Maud Ten Koppel; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Katherine Froggatt Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2019-08-14
Authors: Joni Gilissen; Lara Pivodic; Annelien Wendrich-van Dael; Chris Gastmans; Robert Vander Stichele; Liesbeth Van Humbeeck; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van den Block Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240