Literature DB >> 32155358

Differences of Quality in End-of-Life Care across Settings: Results from the U.S. National Health and Aging Trends Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.

Shuo Xu1, Mangdong Liu2, Oejin Shin1, Vanessa Parker1, Rosalba Hernandez1.   

Abstract

Background: More than 2.5 million older Americans die each year. Place of residence in which dying patients receive care plays a crucial role in the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. Objective: This study aimed to compare proxies' overall rating and ratings for 13 indicators across five major domains of EOL care by place of residence in the last month of decedents' lives. Design: We used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative study of Medicare beneficiaries at age 65 years and older in the United States. Setting/Subjects: Analyses included proxies (N = 1336) of Medicare beneficiaries who passed away between 2013 and 2016. Proxies were categorized into four groups, depending on place of residence in the last month of life and the involvement of hospice. Measurements: Quality of EOL care was assessed using questions modeled after quality of EOL care instruments. We adjusted for demographic data of decedents and proxies.
Results: Hospice recipients, regardless of setting, were more likely to experience pain and talk about religion in the last month of life; families of patients without hospice in residential care settings were more likely to report not being kept informed; proxies of patients living in private residences with hospice care reported higher overall ratings. Among hospice recipients, those living in private residences were more likely to be treated with respect. Conclusions: Disparities exist across settings and in overall ratings for quality of EOL domains-particularly, the subdomains of symptom management, decision making, and spiritual needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  home-based care; hospice; quality of end-of-life care; residential care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32155358      PMCID: PMC7640750          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  38 in total

1.  United States registered nurse workforce report card and shortage forecast.

Authors:  Stephen P Juraschek; Xiaoming Zhang; Vinoth Ranganathan; Vernon W Lin
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Factors important to patients' quality of life at the end of life.

Authors:  Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-13

Review 3.  Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David W Dowdy; Mark P Eid; Artyom Sedrakyan; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Peter J Pronovost; Margaret S Herridge; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Improving the long-term care workforce serving older adults.

Authors:  Robyn Stone; Mary F Harahan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden.

Authors:  Hiroya Kinoshita; Isseki Maeda; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Akemi Yamagishi; Yutaka Shirahige; Toru Takebayashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Ayumi Igarashi; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lara Pivodic; Tinne Smets; Nele Van den Noortgate; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Yvonne Engels; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Katherine Froggatt; Giovanni Gambassi; Luc Deliens; Lieve Van den Block
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Hospice enrollment saves money for Medicare and improves care quality across a number of different lengths-of-stay.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Partha Deb; Qingling Du; Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Quality of End-of-Life Care Provided to Patients With Different Serious Illnesses.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Corey Pilver; Dawn Smith; Mary Ersek; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Brian R Clarridge; Virginia Casey; Lisa C Welch; Terrie Wetle; Renee Shield; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Dying in the hospital setting: A systematic review of quantitative studies identifying the elements of end-of-life care that patients and their families rank as being most important.

Authors:  Claudia Virdun; Tim Luckett; Patricia M Davidson; Jane Phillips
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.762

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.