Manori J Silva1, Lee-Yang Wong1, Ella Samandar1, James L Preau1, Lily T Jia1, Antonia M Calafat2. 1. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America. 2. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America. Electronic address: aic7@cdc.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHTP) is used as a replacement plasticizer for other phthalates, including di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP). Use of consumer products containing DEHTP may result in human exposure to DEHTP. OBJECTIVE: To assess exposure to DEHTP in a nationally representative sample of the U.S. general population 3 years and older from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHOD: We quantified two DEHTP metabolites, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl terephthalate (MEHHTP) and mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl terephthalate (MECPTP) in 2970 urine samples by using online solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We used linear regression to examine associations between MEHHTP and MECTPP and several parameters including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and household income. We also compared the MEHHTP and MECPTP results to those of their corresponding DEHP metabolite analogs, namely mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate (MEHHP) and mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP). RESULTS: The weighted detection frequencies were 96% (MEHHTP) and 99.9% (MECPTP); urinary concentrations of the two metabolites correlated significantly (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.89, p < 0.0001). MECPTP concentrations were higher than MEHHTP in all age, sex, race/ethnicity groups examined. Furthermore, MECPTP adjusted geometric mean (GM) concentrations were significantly higher in samples collected in the evening than in the morning or afternoon. Females had significantly higher adjusted GM concentrations of MEHHTP and MECPTP than males. We observed no significant associations between the adjusted GM concentrations of the metabolites and race/ethnicity. Both metabolite adjusted GM concentrations increased significantly with household income, and decreased significantly with age. Only household income was significantly associated with the concentrations of MECPP, but not of MEHHP, the two DEHP metabolites. The adjusted GM of the [MEHHTP]:[MECPTP] molar concentrations ratio increased with age, and was significantly higher in samples collected in the morning than in those collected in the afternoon or evening. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to DEHTP is widespread in the U.S. general population 3 years and older. These data represent the first U.S. population-based representative background exposure to DEHTP. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHTP) is used as a replacement plasticizer for other phthalates, including di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP). Use of consumer products containing DEHTP may result in human exposure to DEHTP. OBJECTIVE: To assess exposure to DEHTP in a nationally representative sample of the U.S. general population 3 years and older from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHOD: We quantified two DEHTP metabolites, mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl terephthalate (MEHHTP) and mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl terephthalate (MECPTP) in 2970 urine samples by using online solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We used linear regression to examine associations between MEHHTP and MECTPP and several parameters including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and household income. We also compared the MEHHTP and MECPTP results to those of their corresponding DEHP metabolite analogs, namely mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate (MEHHP) and mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (MECPP). RESULTS: The weighted detection frequencies were 96% (MEHHTP) and 99.9% (MECPTP); urinary concentrations of the two metabolites correlated significantly (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.89, p < 0.0001). MECPTP concentrations were higher than MEHHTP in all age, sex, race/ethnicity groups examined. Furthermore, MECPTP adjusted geometric mean (GM) concentrations were significantly higher in samples collected in the evening than in the morning or afternoon. Females had significantly higher adjusted GM concentrations of MEHHTP and MECPTP than males. We observed no significant associations between the adjusted GM concentrations of the metabolites and race/ethnicity. Both metabolite adjusted GM concentrations increased significantly with household income, and decreased significantly with age. Only household income was significantly associated with the concentrations of MECPP, but not of MEHHP, the two DEHP metabolites. The adjusted GM of the [MEHHTP]:[MECPTP] molar concentrations ratio increased with age, and was significantly higher in samples collected in the morning than in those collected in the afternoon or evening. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to DEHTP is widespread in the U.S. general population 3 years and older. These data represent the first U.S. population-based representative background exposure to DEHTP. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: Manori J Silva; Ella Samandar; James L Preau; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham; Antonia M Calafat Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Frederik Lessmann; André Schütze; Tobias Weiss; Thomas Brüning; Holger M Koch Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Deborah J Watkins; Héctor Ramón Torres Zayas; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Zaira Rosario; Michael Welton; Luis D Agosto Arroyo; Nancy Cardona; Zulmarie J Díaz Reguero; Amailie Santos Rivera; Gredia Huerta-Montañez; Phil Brown; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker Journal: Popul Environ Date: 2020-03-17
Authors: Stephanie C Hammel; Jessica L Levasseur; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Amelia M Lorenzo; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Jessica A Craig; Diana M Ceballos; Victoria Fruh; Zoe E Petropoulos; Joseph G Allen; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; Heather M Stapleton; Stephanie Hammel; Rebecca Gray; Thomas F Webster Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Diana C Pacyga; Diana K Haggerty; Megan Nicol; Melissa Henning; Antonia M Calafat; Joseph M Braun; Susan L Schantz; Rita S Strakovsky Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Haotian Wu; Allison J Kupsco; Andrea L Deierlein; Allan C Just; Antonia M Calafat; Emily Oken; Joseph M Braun; Adriana Mercado-Garcia; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Andrea L Deierlein; Haotian Wu; Allan C Just; Allison J Kupsco; Joseph M Braun; Emily Oken; Diana C Soria-Contreras; Alejandra Cantoral; Ma Luisa Pizano; Nia McRae; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Elena Colicino; Erik de Water; Allan C Just; Esmeralda Navarro; Nicolo Foppa Pedretti; Nia McRae; Joseph M Braun; Lourdes Schnaas; Yanelli Rodríguez-Carmona; Carmen Hernández; Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Andrea L Deierlein; Antonia M Calafat; Andrea Baccarelli; Robert O Wright; Megan K Horton Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Lariah Edwards; Nathan L McCray; Brianna N VanNoy; Alice Yau; Ruth J Geller; Gary Adamkiewicz; Ami R Zota Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 6.371