Literature DB >> 30271587

Androgen-dependent alternative mRNA isoform expression in prostate cancer cells.

Jennifer Munkley1, Teresa M Maia2,3, Nekane Ibarluzea1,4,5, Karen E Livermore1, Daniel Vodak6, Ingrid Ehrmann1, Katherine James7,8, Prabhakar Rajan9, Nuno L Barbosa-Morais2, David J Elliott1.   

Abstract

Background: Androgen steroid hormones are key drivers of prostate cancer. Previous work has shown that androgens can drive the expression of alternative mRNA isoforms as well as transcriptional changes in prostate cancer cells. Yet to what extent androgens control alternative mRNA isoforms and how these are expressed and differentially regulated in prostate tumours is unknown.
Methods: Here we have used RNA-Seq data to globally identify alternative mRNA isoform expression under androgen control in prostate cancer cells, and profiled the expression of these mRNA isoforms in clinical tissue.
Results: Our data indicate androgens primarily switch mRNA isoforms through alternative promoter selection. We detected 73 androgen regulated alternative transcription events, including utilisation of 56 androgen-dependent alternative promoters, 13 androgen-regulated alternative splicing events, and selection of 4 androgen-regulated alternative 3' mRNA ends. 64 of these events are novel to this study, and 26 involve previously unannotated isoforms. We validated androgen dependent regulation of 17 alternative isoforms by quantitative PCR in an independent sample set. Some of the identified mRNA isoforms are in genes already implicated in prostate cancer (including LIG4, FDFT1 and RELAXIN), or in genes important in other cancers (e.g. NUP93 and MAT2A). Importantly, analysis of transcriptome data from 497 tumour samples in the TGCA prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) cohort identified 13 mRNA isoforms (including TPD52, TACC2 and NDUFV3) that are differentially regulated in localised prostate cancer relative to normal tissue, and 3 ( OSBPL1A, CLK3 and TSC22D3) which change significantly with Gleason grade and  tumour stage. Conclusions: Our findings dramatically increase the number of known androgen regulated isoforms in prostate cancer, and indicate a highly complex response to androgens in prostate cancer cells that could be clinically important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR; Androgens; alternative 3' ends; alternative promoters; alternative splicing; mRNA isoforms; prostate cancer; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30271587      PMCID: PMC6143958          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15604.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


Introduction

A single human gene can potentially yield a diverse array of alternative mRNA isoforms, thereby expanding both the repertoire of gene products and subsequently the number of alternative proteins produced. mRNAs with different exon combinations are transcribed from most (up to 90%) human genes, and can generate variants that differ in regulatory untranslated regions, or encode proteins with different sub-cellular localisations and functions [1– 5]. Altered splicing patterns have been suggested as a new hallmark of cancer cells [6– 8], and in prostate cancer there is emerging evidence that expression of specific mRNA isoforms derived from cancer-relevant genes may contribute to disease progression [9– 11]. Androgen steroid hormones and the androgen receptor (AR) play a key role in the development and progression of prostate cancer, with alternative splicing enabling cancer cells to produce constitutively active ARs [11– 13]. The AR belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors, and is essential for prostate cancer cell survival, proliferation and invasion [14– 16]. Classically, androgen binding promotes AR dimerization and its translocation to the nucleus, where it acts as either a transcriptional activator or a transcriptional repressor to dictate prostate specific gene expression patterns [17– 23]. The major focus for prostate cancer therapeutics has been to reduce androgen levels through androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), either with inhibitors of androgen synthesis (for example, abiraterone) or with antagonists that prevent androgen binding to the AR (such as bicalutamide or enzalutamide) [24]. Although ADT is usually initially effective, most patients ultimately develop lethal castrate resistant disease for which there are limited treatment options [11, 12]. Androgens and other steroid hormones have also been associated with alternative splicing. Recent RNA-sequencing-based analysis of the androgen response of prostate cancer cells grown in vitro and within patients following ADT identified a set of 700 genes whose transcription is regulated by the AR in prostate cancer cells [25]. However, in addition to regulating transcriptional levels, steroid hormone receptors can control exon content of mRNA [10, 26– 29]. In prostate cancer androgens can modulate the expression of mRNA isoforms via pre-mRNA processing and promoter selection [9, 10, 18, 30]. The AR can recruit the RNA binding proteins Sam68 and p68 as cofactors to influence alternative splicing of specific genes, and studies using minigenes driven from steroid responsive promoters indicate that the AR can affect both the transcriptional activity and alternative splicing of a subset of target genes [11, 31, 32]. Other steroid hormones also coordinate both transcription and splicing decisions [29]. The thyroid hormone receptor (TR) is known to play a role in coordinating the regulation of transcription and alternative splicing [27], and the oestrogen receptor (ER) can both regulate alternative promoter selection and induce alternative splicing of specific gene sets that can influence breast cancer cell behaviour [28, 33– 35]. In previous work we used exon level microarray analysis to identify 7 androgen dependent changes in mRNA isoform expression [10]. However, to what extent androgen-regulated mRNA isoforms are expressed in clinical prostate cancer is unclear. To address this, here we have used RNA-Sequencing data to globally profile alternative isoform expression in prostate cancer cells exposed to androgens, and correlated the results with transcriptomic data from clinical tissue. Our findings increase the number of known AR regulated mRNA isoforms by 10 fold and imply that pre-mRNA processing is an important mechanism through which androgens regulate gene expression in prostate cancer.

Methods

Cell culture

Cell culture was as described previously [25, 36]. All cells were grown at 37°C in 5% CO 2. LNCaP cells (CRL-1740, ATCC) were maintained in RPMI-1640 with L-Glutamine (PAA Laboratories, R15-802) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (PAA Laboratories, A15-101). For androgen treatment of cells, medium was supplemented with 10% dextran charcoal stripped FBS (PAA Laboratories, A15-119) to produce a steroid-deplete medium. Following culture for 72 hours, 10 nM synthetic androgen analogue methyltrienolone (R1881) (Perkin-Elmer, NLP005005MG) was either added (Androgen +) or absent (Steroid deplete) for the times indicated.

RNA-Seq analysis

RNA-seq transcript expression analysis of previously generated data [25] was performed according to the Tuxedo protocol [37]. All reads were first mapped to human transcriptome/genome (build hg19) with TopHat [38]/Bowtie [39], followed by per-sample transcript assembly with Cufflinks [40]. The mapped data was processed with Cuffmerge, Cuffdiff and Cuffcompare, followed by extraction of significantly differentially expressed genes/isoforms; expression changes between cells grown with androgen and cells grown without androgens were assessed. Reference files for the human genome (UCSC build hg19) were downloaded from the Cufflinks pages: ( UCSC-hg19 package from June 2012 was used.). The software versions used for the analysis were: TopHat v1.4.1, SAM tools Version: 0.1.18 (r982:295), bowtie version 0.12.8 (64-bit) and cufflinks v1.3.0 (linked against Boost version 104000). The Tuxedo protocol [37] was carried out as follows: For steps 1–5, no parameters (except for paths to input/output files) were altered. In step 15, additional switches -s, -R, and -C were used when running cuffcompare. Steps 16–18 (extraction of significant results) were performed on the command line.

RNA extraction, RT–PCR and real-time PCR

Cells were harvested and total RNA extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, 15596-026) according to manufacturer's instructions. RNA was treated with DNase 1 (Ambion, AM2222) and cDNA was generated by reverse transcription of 500ng of total RNA using the Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, 11754-050). Alternative events were analysed by either reverse transcriptase PCR or real-time PCR. Exon profiles were monitored and quantified using the Qiaxcel capillary electrophoresis system (Qiagen) and percentage inclusion was calculated as described previously [10]. Real time PCR was performed in triplicate on cDNA using SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen, 4309155) and the QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were normalised using the average of three reference genes, GAPDH, β -tubulin and actin. Ct values for each sample were calculated using SDS 2.4 software (Applied Biosystems) and relative mRNA expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Raw Ct values are given in Dataset 1 [41].

Antibodies

The following commercial antibodies were used in the study: anti-RLN2 rabbit monoclonal (Abcam, ab183505 1:1000 dilution), anti-TACC2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (11407-1-AP, Proteintech 1:500 dilution), anti-NDUFV3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (13430-1-AP, Proteintech 1:500 dilution), anti-actin rabbit polyclonal (A2668, Sigma 1:2000 dilution), anti-α-Tubulin mouse monoclonal (Sigma, T5168 1:2000 dilution), normal rabbit IgG (711-035-152, Jackson labs 1:2000 dilution) and normal mouse IgG (715-036-150, Jackson labs 1:2000 dilution).

Gene ontology analysis

Gene ontology (GO) analysis of RNA-Seq data was carried out as described previously [42]. Enrichment of GO terms (with b500 annotations) was calculated using the goseq R package (version 1.18.0). Genes were considered significant at a p-value threshold of 0.05 after adjustment using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate.

Bioinformatic analysis of patient transcriptome data

Available clinical and processed RNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) cohort, comprising 497 tumour samples from as many patients with different stages / Gleason grades and 52 matched samples taken from normal prostate tissue (were downloaded from the Broad Institute TCGA Genome Analysis Center (Firehose 16/01/28 run https://doi.org/10.7908/C11G0KM9 [43]). Transcriptome data from the TCGA PRAD cohort were analysed for alternative isoform expression, with transcript models relying on TCGA GAF2.1, corresponding to the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome annotation from June 2011 ( hg19 assembly). This annotation encompassed 42 of the 73 androgen-regulated alternative mRNA isoform pairs identified. These were studied using two types of analysis: 1) differential transcript expression between tumour and normal prostate tissue and 2) correlation between isoform expression in tumour samples and Gleason score or tumour stage. Differential isoform and gene expression analysis was performed on estimated read counts using the (version 3.7) following its RNA-Seq analysis workflow [44]. This workflow was also used for differential isoform ratio analysis, relying on logit-transformed ratio (see below). An FDR-adjusted p-value of 0.05 for the moderated t-statistics was used as threshold for significance of differential expression. Individual isoform expression was estimated in TPM (transcripts per million mapped reads). The expression ratio, henceforth called PSI (percent spliced-in), of each annotated androgen-regulated isoform pair in each TCGA sample was calculated as the ratio between the expression of isoform 1 and the total expression of isoforms 1 and 2 combined, i.e. the sum of their expressions. For each isoform pair, ΔPSI is the difference of median PSI between the tumour and the normal groups of samples. Two-tailed Spearman’s rank correlation tests were used to study the association between isoform expression and both Gleason score and tumour stage (these were used herein as numeric variables). An FDR-adjusted p-value of 0.05 was used as threshold for significance. Isoform expression differences between tumour and normal samples were considered equivalent to those detected in LNCaP cells under androgen stimulation when there was a statistically significant consistent change in the levels of the expected induced or repressed isoform (1 or 2), concomitant with no contradictory change in the PSI. Isoform “switches” were considered equivalent when there was a minimum (ΔPSI > 2.5%) and statistically significant consistent change in the PSI. Equivalent criteria were used to evaluate the equivalence between androgen-dependence and the associations with Gleason score and tumour stage.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the GraphPad Prism software (version 5.04/d). PCR quantification of mRNA isoforms was assessed using the unpaired student’s t-test. Data is presented as the mean of three independent samples ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance is denoted as * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 and **** p ≤ 0.0001.

Results

Global identification of androgen-dependent mRNA isoform production in prostate cancer cells predicts a major role for alternative promoter utilisation

We analysed previously published RNAseq data from LNCaP cells [25] to globally profile how frequently androgens drive production of alternative mRNA isoforms in prostate cancer cells. This analysis identified a group of 73 androgen regulated alternative mRNA isoforms, which could be validated by visualisation on the UCSC Genome Browser [45] ( Table 1). 64 AR regulated mRNA isoforms were novel to this study. Experimental validation in an independent RNA sample set using RT-PCR confirmed 17/17 of these alternative events at the mRNA level ( Supplementary Figure 1). 73% of genes (53/73) with identified alternative androgen regulated mRNA isoforms also changed their overall expression levels in response to androgens ( Table 2). Some of the androgen regulated alternative events are in genes are already implicated in in either prostate cancer or other cancer types (summarised in Table 3). However, Gene Ontology analysis of these 73 genes did not identify any significantly enriched biological processes.
Table 1.

Details of the 73 androgen regulated mRNA isoforms identified in prostate cancer cells.

Isoform 1 Isoform 2 TCGA PRAD
GeneEvent typePosition (hg19)RefSeqPosition (hg19)RefSeqChange with androgensPCR ValidationPredicted to change protein?Isoform 1 IDIsoform 2 IDComparable?
LIG4 Alternative promoter chr13:108859792- 108870716 NM_001098268.1 chr13:108859792- 108867130 NM_002312.3 Induction of promoter 2Yes (Qiaxel)No (5' UTR)uc001vqp.2uc001vqn.2Yes
TACC2 Alternative promoter chr10:123748689- 124014060 NM_206862.3 chr10:123872554- 124014060 NM_001291879.1 Repression of promoter 1 Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc001lfv.2uc001lfx.2Yes
TPD52 Alternative promoter chr8:80947103- 81083894 NM_001287144.1 chr8:80947103- 80993066 NM_001025252.2Induction of promoter 2Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc003ybs.1uc003ybr.1Yes
NUP93 Alternative promoter chr16:56764017- 56878861 NM_014669.4 chr16:56815704- 56878861 NM_001242795.1 Induction of promoter 1Yes (SYBR) Yes uc002eka.2uc002ekb.2Yes
RLN1 Alternative promoter chr9:5334932- 5339873 NM_006911.3 chr9:5335270- 5339396 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes (Qiaxel)Yes (change from non- coding)uc003zjb.1 Not annotated No
AP2S1 Alternative promoter chr19:47341415- 47354252 NM_001301078.1 chr19:47341415- 47353547 NM_001301076.1Induction of promoter 2Yes (SYBR) Yes uc002pft.1 Not annotated No
RLN2 Alternative promoter chr9:5299866- 5304611 NM_005059.3 chr9:5299890- 5304222 Not annotated Induction of promoter 1Yes (Qiaxel)Yes (change from non- coding)uc003ziz.1 Not annotated No
PIK3R1 Alternative promoter chr5:67511584- 67597649 NM_181523.2 chr5:67584252- 67597649 NM_181524.1 Repression of promoter 2 Yes (SYBR) Yes uc003jva.2uc003jvc.2Yes
MAPRE2 Alternative promoter chr18:32556892- 32723432 NM_001143826.2 chr18:32621324- 32723432 NM_014268.3 Switch to promoter 2Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc010xcb.1uc002kyf.2Yes
NDUFAF4 Alternative promoter chr6:97337187- 97345767 NM_014165.3 chr6:97337227- 97345368 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes (Qiaxel)Yes (change from non- coding)uc003pov.2 Not annotated No
DCXR Alternative promoter chr17:79993757- 79995573 NM_016286.3 chr17:79993765- 79995217 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc002kdg.2 Not annotated No
PEX10 Alternative promoter chr1:2336241- 2344010 NM_002617.3 Not annotated Switch to promoter 2Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc001ajh.2 Not annotated No
SNAPC2 Alternative promoter chr19:7985194- 7988136 NM_003083.3 chr19:7985867- 7988136 NR_030717.1 Switch to promoter 2Yes (SYBR)Yes (change to non- coding)uc002miw.1uc002mix.1Yes
ATP6V0D1 Alternative promoter chr16:67471917- 67515089 NM_004691.4 chr16:67471931- 67475338 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc002ete.1 Not annotated No
ARRDC1 Alternative promoter chr9:140500092- 140509812 NM_001317968.1 chr9:140506874- 140509793 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2Yes (change to non- coding)uc004cnp.1 Not annotated No
DENND1A Alternative promoter chr9:126141933- 126692417 NM_020946.1 chr9:126143408- 126586780 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc004bnz.1 Not annotated No
KLHL36 Alternative promoter chr16:84682117- 84701292 NM_024731.3 chr16:84684274- 84701134 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002fig.2 Not annotated No
RAB3IL1 Alternative promoter chr11:61664768- 61687741 NM_001271686.1 chr11:61664768- 61685081 NM_013401.3 Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc001nsp.2uc001nso.2Yes
ACER3 Alternative promoter chr11:76571917- 76737841 NM_018367.6 chr11:76631206- 76737818 Not annotated Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc009yum.1 Not annotated No
OSBPL1A Alternative promoter chr18:21742011- 21977833 NM_080597.3 chr18:21742011- 21852196 NM_018030.4 Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002kve.2uc002kvd.2Yes
TRIM16 Alternative promoter chr17:15531280- 15586193 NM_006470.3 chr17:15530970- 15555735 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002gow.2 Not annotated No
VSIG10L Alternative promoter chr19:51834795- 51845378 NM_001163922.1 chr19:51834795- 51843009 Not annotated Induction of promoter 1 Yes uc002pwf.2 Not annotated No
SEPT5 Alternative promoter chr22:19701987- 19710845 NM_002688.5 chr22:19705958- 19710845 NM_001009939.2 Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc002zpv.1uc002zpw.1Yes
HMGCR Alternative promoter chr5:74632154- 74657926 NM_000859 chr5:74632993- 74657926 NM_000859.2 Repression of promoter 1 Yes uc011cst.1uc003kdp.2Yes
RDH13 Alternative promoter chr19:55555692- 55580914 NM_138412.3 chr19:55555692- 55574585 NM_001145971.1 Induction of promoter 1 Yes uc002qip.2uc010esr.1Yes
GPRIN2 Alternative promoter chr10:46993001- 47000677 Not annotated chr10:46993546- 47000568 NM_014696.3 Repression of promoter 2 No (5' UTR) Not annotated uc001jec.2No
CLK3 Alternative promoter chr15:74900713- 74922542 NM_003992.4 chr15:74,908,246- 74,922,542 NM_003992 Repression of promoter 1 Yes uc002ayg.3uc002ayj.3Yes
RNH1 Alternative promoter chr11:494512- 507283 NM_203387.2 chr11:494512- 506821 NM_002939.3Induction of promoter 1No (5' UTR)uc001lpp.1uc001lpl.1Yes
ZFAND6 Alternative promoter chr15:80351910- 80430735 NM_001242911.1 chr15:80364903- 80430735 NM_001242916.1 Repression of promoter 2 No (5' UTR)uc002bff.1uc002bfh.1Yes
CDIP1 Alternative promoter chr16:4560677- 4588816 NM_013399.2 chr16:4560677- 4588471 NM_001199054.1 Repression of promoter 2 No (5' UTR)uc002cwu.2uc002cwv.2Yes
YIF1B Alternative promoter chr19:38794200- 38806606 NM_001039672.2 chr19:38794200- 38806445 NM_001145461.1Switch to promoter 2 Yes uc002ohz.2uc002ohx.2Yes
LIMK2 Alternative promoter chr22:31608250- 31676066 NM_005569.3 chr22:31644348- 31676066 NM_016733.2 Switch to promoter 2 Yes uc003akh.2uc003aki.2Yes
TSC22D3 Alternative promoter chrX:106956452- 106959711 NM_001015881.1 chrX:106956452- 106960291 NM_004089.3 Repression of promoter 1 Yes uc004enf.2uc004eng.2Yes
ALDH1A3 Alternative promoter chr15:101419897- 101456830 NM_000693.3 chr15:101438281- 101457072 Not annotated Repression of promoter 1 Yes uc002bwn.3 Not annotated No
TRABD Alternative promoter chr22:50624341- 50638028 NM_001320485.1 chr22:50628979- 50638028 NM_001320487.1 Switch to promoter 2No (5' UTR)uc003bjq.1uc003bjs.1Yes
LIMCH1 Alternative promoter chr4:41361624- 41702061 NM_001289124.1 chr4:41362648- 41702061 NM_001289122.2 Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc003gvu.3 Not annotated No
GMFB Alternative promoter chr14:54941209- 54955744 NM_004124.2 chr14:54941314- 54955637 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2Yes (change to non- coding)uc010tqz.1 Not annotated No
MLST8 Alternative promoter chr16:2255178- 2259418 NM_022372.4 chr16:2255732- 2259418 NM_001199174.1 Switch to promoter 1No (5' UTR)uc010uvy.1uc002cpf.2Yes
TLE3 Alternative promoter chr15:70340130- 70390256 NM_020908.2 chr15:70340130- 70387124 NM_001282982.1Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002asn.2uc002ask.2Yes
UBA1 Alternative promoter chrX:47050199- 47074527 NM_153280.2 chrX:47053201- 47074527 NM_003334.3 Repression of promoter 1 No (5' UTR)uc004dhj.3uc004dhk.3Yes
TNRC6B Alternative promoter chr22:40440821- 40731812 NM_001024843.1 chr22:40573929- 40731812 NM_001162501.1 Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc003aym.2uc011aor.1Yes
FDFT1 Alternative promoter chr8:11660120- 11696818 NM_004462.4 chr8:11665926- 11696818 NM_001287750.1 Repression of promoter 2 Yes uc003wui.2uc010lsb.2Yes
GREB1 Alternative promoter chr2:11674242- 11782912 NM_014668.3 chr2:11680080- 11728355 NM_148903.2 Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002rbo.1uc002rbl.2Yes
NCAPD3 Alternative promoter chr11:134022337- 134094426 NM_015261.2 chr11:134022772- 134093593 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc001qhd.1 Not annotated No
SLC36A4 Alternative promoter chr11:92877337- 92931141 NM_152313.3 chr11:92877337- 92930621 NM_001286139.1Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc001pdn.2 Not annotated No
KLC2 Alternative promoter chr11:66024765- 66035331 NM_001134775.1 chr11:66025174- 66035331 NM_022822.2 Repression of promoter 1 No (5' UTR)uc010rov.1uc001ohb.2Yes
RAP1GAP Alternative promoter chr1:21922708- 21978348 NM_001145658.1 chr1:21922533- 21946950 Not annotated Repression of promoter 1 Yes uc001bez.1 Not annotated No
TMEM79 Alternative promoter chr1:156252704- 156262234 NR_026678.1 chr1:156254070- 156262234 NM_032323.2 Repression of promoter 1 No (5' UTR)uc001fod.2uc010phi.1Yes
NR4A1 Alternative promoter chr12:52416616- 52453291 NM_001202233.1 chr12:52445186- 52453291 NM_173157.2 Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc010sno.1uc001rzr.2Yes
ZNF32 Alternative promoter chr10:44139307- 44144326 NM_001324166.1 chr10:44139307- 44144326 NM_001324167.1 Repression of promoter 2 No (5' UTR)uc001jbc.2uc001jbb.2Yes
C1QTNF3 Alternative promoter chr5:34017963- 34043371 NM_181435.5 chr5:34018571- 34035881 Not annotated Induction of promoter 1 Yes uc003jio.2 Not annotated No
UBE2D3 Alternative promoter chr4:103715540- 103748710 NM_181887.2 chr4:103715540- 103749105 NM_181886.3 Switch to promoter 2No (5' UTR)uc003hwk.2uc011cet.1Yes
KRT8 Alternative promoter chr12:53290971- 53343650 NM_001256293.1 chr12:53,290,971- 53,298,868 NM_002273 Repression of promoter 1 No (5' UTR)uc009zml.1uc001sbd.2Yes
ELOVL1 Alternative promoter chr1:43829068- 43833745 NM_022821.3 chr1:43829093- 43832057 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2Yes (change to non- coding)uc001cjb.2 Not annotated No
RCAN1 Alternative promoter chr21:35888740- 35987441 NM_004414.6 chr21:35888740- 35899308 NM_203418.2Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc002yue.2uc002yub.2Yes
SORBS3 Alternative promoter chr8:22409251- 22433008 NM_005775.4 chr8:22422332- 22433100 Not annotated Induction of promoter 2 Yes uc003xbv.2 Not annotated No
MAT2A Alternative 3' end chr2:85766101- 85772403 NM_005911.5 chr2:85,766,101- 85,770,775 NM_005911 Repression of isoform 2 Yes (Qiaxel) Yes uc002spr.2uc010ysr.1Yes
CNNM2 Alternative 3' end chr10:104678075- 104687375 NM_199077.2 chr10:104678075- 104838344 NM_017649.4 Induction of isoform 1Yes (SYBR) Yes uc001kwl.2uc001kwm.2Yes
TMEM125 Alternative 3' end chr1:43735698- 43736343 Not annotated chr1:43735665- 43739673 NM_144626.2Induction of isoform 1Yes (change to non- coding) Not annotated uc001cir.2No
CBWD2 Alternative 3' end chr2:114195268- 114253781 NM_172003.3 chr2:114195169- 114199073 Not annotated Induction of isoform 2 Yes uc002tju.2 Not annotated No
NDUFV3 Alternative exon chr21:44313378- 44329773 NM_021075.3 chr21:44313378- 44329773 NM_001001503.1Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) Yes uc002zcm.2uc002zcn.2Yes
ZNF678 Alternative exon chr1:227751220- 227850164 NM_178549.3 Not annotated Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)Yes (change to non- coding)uc009xet.1 Not annotated No
ZNF121 Alternative exon chr19:9676404- 9695209 NM_001308269.1 chr19:9676404- 9695209 NM_001008727.3 Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) Yes uc010xkq.1uc010xkp.1Yes
SPATC1L Alternative exon chr21:47581062- 47604373 NM_032261.4 Not annotated Induction of isoform 2 (exon included) Yes uc002zii.2 Not annotated No
MOCOS Alternative exon chr18:33767480- 33848685 NM_017947.2 Not annotated Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) Yes uc002kzq.3 Not annotated No
RBM45 Alternative exon chr2:178977151- 178994382 NM_152945.3 Not annotated Switch to isoform 2 (exon included) Yes uc002ulv.2 Not annotated No
MIPEP Alternative exon chr13:24304328- 24463587 NM_005932.3 Not annotated Repression of isoform 2 (exon excluded) Yes uc001uox.3 Not annotated No
BBS4 Alternative exon chr15:72978520- 73030817 NM_001320665.1 Not annotated Induction of isoform 2 (exon included) Yes uc002avb.2 Not annotated No
FAM195A Alternative exon chr16:691804- 698474 NM_138418.3 chr16:691804- 698474 NR_138607.1 Switch to isoform 1 (exon exluded)Yes (change from non- coding)uc002cic.1uc002cie.2Yes
LINC01133 Alternative exon chr1:159931008- 159948851 ENST00000443364.6 chr1:159931014- 159948876 NR_038849.1 Induction of isoform 1 (exon excluded)Both non-coding Not annotated uc001fuu.2No
SS18 Alternative exon chr18:23596217- 23670611 NM_001007559.2 chr18:23596217- 23670611 NM_005637.3 Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) Yes uc002kvm.2uc002kvn.2Yes
RHOC Alternative exon chr1:113243897- 113249757 ENST00000369638.6 chr1:113243947- 113249742 ENST00000369636.6Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)No (5' UTR)uc009wgk.1uc001ecr.1Yes
ZNF226 Retained intron chr19:44669215- 44681838 NM_001319088.1 chr19:44669249- 44679582 NM_015919.3 Switch to isoform 1 (intron included) Yes uc002oyo.2uc002oyn.2Yes
Table 2.

Quantitative changes in gene expression in response to androgens for the 73 genes with AR regulated alternative mRNA isoforms.

LNCaP RNA-Seq (+/- androgens for 24 hours)Reciprocal RNA-Seq (also change in 7 patients following ADT)
No changeUpregulatedDownregulatedNo changeUpregulatedDownregulated
RLN2LIG4NUP93LIG4TPD52None
DENND1ATACC2PIK3R1TACC2AP2S1
RAB3IL1RLN1MAPRE2NUP93DCXR
OSBPL1AAP2S1NDUFAF4RLN1PEX10
TRIM16DCXRACER3RLN2HMGCR
Sep-05PEX10GPRIN2PIK3R1ALDH1A3
RDH13SNAPC2TLE3MAPRE2FDFT1
ZFAND6ATP6V0D1TNRC6BNDUFAF4GREB1
CDIP1ARRDC1SORBS3SNAPC2NCAPD3
LIMK2KLHL36ZNF121ATP6V0D1RAP1GAP
TSC22D3VSIG10LLINC01133ARRDC1TMEM79
GMFBHMGCRDENND1AKRT8
MLST8CLK3KLHL36ELOVL1
znf32RNH1RAB3IL1TMEM125
C1QTNF3YIF1BACER3
UBE2D3PAK1IP1OSBPL1A
MAT2AALDH1A3TRIM16
CBWD2TRABDVSIG10L
ZNF678LIMCH1SEPT5
MOCOSUBA1RDH13
FDFT1GPRIN2
GREB1CLK3
NCAPD3RNH1
SLC36A4ZFAND6
KLC2CDIP1
RAP1GAPYIF1B
TMEM79LIMK2
NR4A1TSC22D3
KRT8TRABD
ELOVL1LIMCH1
RCAN1GMFB
CNNM2MLST8
TMEM125TLE3
NDUFV3UBA1
SPATC1LTNRC6B
RBM45SLC36A4
MIPEPKLC2
BBS4NR4A1
FAM195Aznf32
SS18C1QTNF3
RHOCUBE2D3
ZNF226RCAN1
TPD52SORBS3
MAT2A
CNNM2
CBWD2
NDUFV3
ZNF678
ZNF121
SPATC1L
MOCOS
RBM45
MIPEP
BBS4
FAM195A
LINC01133
SS18
RHOC
ICAM3
ZNF226
Table 3.

Alternative events in genes previously linked to cancer.

Gene nameFunctionClinical importance and roles in other cancer typesClinical importance and roles in prostate cancer
TACC2 Transforming Acidic Coiled- Coil Containing Protein 2centrosome- and microtubule-interacting proteinGrowth and prognosis of breast cancer [56] castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer [57]
LIG4 DNA ligase with role in DNA repairPrognostic marker in nasopharyngeal cancer [58] Upregulated in colorectal cancer with role in wnt signalling [59] Predictor of poor prognosis [60]
RLN1 and RLN2 (Relaxin1 and 2)Endocrine hormones (part of insulin gene superfamily)Breast cancer invasiveness [61, 62] metastasis of human osteosarcoma [63] Thyroid cancer oncogenesis [64, 65] Well characterised role in the development and progression of prostate cancer [5, 5055].
TPD52 (Tumor Protein D52)Role in proliferation and exo- and endocytic pathwaysWell characterised role in numerous cancer types [46, 6669] Known AR target, overexpressed and amplified in prostate cancer [70] Oncogene in prostate cancer [71] Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of prostate cancer [72] Isoform produced by alternative promoter known as PrLZ and already linked to prostate cancer [4749, 73, 74]
FDFT1 (Farnesyl-Diphosphate Farnesyltransferase 1)squalene synthaseRole in lung cancer metastasis [75] Linked to prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness [76]
TLE3 (Transducin Like Enhancer Of Split 3)Negative regulator of Wnt/β- catenin signalingPredictive marker for response to therapy in ovarian and breast cancer [77, 78] Represses colon cancer proliferation [79] Upregulated in prostate tumours [80] and linked to wnt signalling in castrate resistant disease [81]
CNNM2 (Cyclin & CBS Domain Divalent Metal Cation Transport Mediator 2)Magnesium transporterProposed oncogenic role via increasing magnesium uptake [82] Unknown
NUP93 Nucleoporin protein – role in apoptosisDriver mutation linked to breast cancer [83] Unknown
MAT2A Methionine adenosyltransferase IIBiosynthesis of S-adenosylmethionine, the principal biological methyl donor and precursor of polyamines and glutathione.Upregulated in liver and colon cancer, potential drug target [84, 85] Tumour suppressor in kidney carcinogenesis [86] Role in other cancer types [87] Upregulated in prostate cancer and linked to cell migration via miR-34a and miR- 34b [87, 88]
PIK3R1 PI3K regulatory subunitUnderexpressed in breast cancer [89] High mutation frequency in endometrial cancer [90] Controlled by androgens and repressed in prostate cancer cells [21]
SNAPC2 (Small Nuclear RNA Activating Complex Polypeptide 2)Subunit of the snRNA- activating protein complex. Necessary for RNA polymerase II and III dependent small-nuclear RNA gene transcriptionEpigenetic silencing is prognostic in glioblastoma [91] Unknown
ZNF678 (Zinc Finger Protein 678)Potential role in transcriptional regulationUnknownUnknown
NDUFV3 (NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Subunit V3)Subunit of part of the mitochondrial respiratory chainUnknownAndrogen regulated alternative splice isoform previously identified by our exon array study [10]
OSBPL1A (Oxysterol Binding Protein Like 1A)Intracellular lipid receptorAlternative promoter use in colorectal cancer [92] Unknown
RDH13 (Retinol Dehydrogenase 13)Role in retinoic acid production and protection against oxidative stressUnknownUnknown
ZNF121 (Zinc Finger Protein 121)Potential role in transcriptional regulationInteracts with MYC. Upregulated in breast cancer [93] Unknown
SLC36A4.1 (Solute Carrier Family 36 Member 4)amino acid transporterUnknownUnknown
RCAN1 (Regulator of Calcineurin 1)Inhibits calcineurin- dependent signaling pathwaysInhibits NF-κB and suppresses lymphoma growth in mice [94]. Role in cancer cell migration [95] Unknown
DCXR (Dicarbonyl & l-xylulose reductase)Role in the uronate cycle of glucose metabolismLow expression indicates poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma [96]. Role in cell adhesion [97, 98] Upregulated and potential biomarker in prostate cancer [99]
NDUFAF4 (NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Complex Assembly Factor 4)Role in the mitochondrial respiratory chainUnknownUnknown
MAPRE2 (Microtubule Associated Protein RP/EB Family Member 2)Microtubule-associated protein that is necessary for spindle symmetry during mitosisRole in the invasion of pancreatic cancer cells [100] Unknown
PEX10 (Peroxisomal Biogenesis Factor 10)Involved in import of peroxisomal matrix proteinsUnknownUnknown
AP2S1 (Adaptor Related Protein Complex 2 Sigma 1 Subunit)Function in protein transport across membranesUnknownUnknown
LINC01133 (long non-coding RNA)Long non-coding RNAPoor prognosis in colorectal cancer [101] Upregulated and linked to poor prognosis in lung cancer [102] Unknown
ZNF226 (Zinc Finger Protein 226)Potential role in transcriptional regulationUnknownUnknown
CDIP1 (Cell death inducing p53 target 1)p53 apoptotic effector Regulates TNF-alpha- mediated apoptosissensitivity to TNFα- induced apoptosis in cancer cells [103] Unknown
The 73 identified mRNA isoforms were generated via androgen-regulated utilisation of 56 alternative promoters, 4 alternative 3′ ends and 13 alternative splicing events ( Figure 1A). Of the 56 androgen regulated alternative promoters that were identified, 23 alternative promoters were induced by androgens (including LIG4, Figure 1B), 26 promoters were repressed by androgens, and for 7 genes there was a switch in usage from one promoter to another ( Table 1). The alternative splicing events that were under androgen control included 12 alternative exons and one androgen-regulated intron retention ( Table 1). 10 of these are novel to this study, including exclusion of an alternative exon in ZNF678 ( Figure 1C). Of the alternative exons, six genes contained switches in previously unannotated protein-coding exons in response to androgen-exposure. We also identified four androgen regulated alternative mRNA 3' end isoform switches, including a switch in the 3’ end of the mRNA transcript for the MAT2A gene ( Figure 1D).
Figure 1.

Global identification of androgen-dependent mRNA isoform production in prostate cancer cells predicts a major role for alternative promoter utilisation.

(A) Analysis of RNAseq data from LNCaP cells grown with (A+) or without androgens (R1881) (steroid deplete, SD) for 24 hours identified 73 androgen regulated alternative mRNA isoforms. The 73 alternative events were generated via androgen-regulated utilisation of 56 alternative promoters, 4 alternative 3' ends and 13 alternative splicing events. (B) Androgens drive a promoter switch in the LIG4 gene, which produces an mRNA isoform with an alternative 5’UTR. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the LIG4 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce a different 5’UTR without influencing the protein sequence (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate that in response to androgens there is repression of promoter 1 and induction of promoter 2 (right panel). (C) Androgens drive alternative splicing of the ZNF678 gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the ZNF678 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch to inclusion of a cassette exon in the presence of androgens. Inclusion of the alternative cassette exon in the ZNF678 gene is predicted to induce a switch to an alternative non-coding mRNA isoform (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers in flanking exons confirmed increased inclusion of the alternative exon in LNCaP cells exposed to androgens (right panel). (D) Androgens promote selection of an alternative 3’ end for the MAT2A gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the MAT2A gene on the UCSC genome browser indicates a switch to reduced usage of an alternative 3’ end in the presence of androgens (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each isoform confirmed down-regulation of an alternative 3’ end (p<0.01). Alternative 3’ ends for the MAT2A gene are predicted to produce proteins with different amino acid sequences and to influence a known Pfam domain (right panel).

Global identification of androgen-dependent mRNA isoform production in prostate cancer cells predicts a major role for alternative promoter utilisation.

(A) Analysis of RNAseq data from LNCaP cells grown with (A+) or without androgens (R1881) (steroid deplete, SD) for 24 hours identified 73 androgen regulated alternative mRNA isoforms. The 73 alternative events were generated via androgen-regulated utilisation of 56 alternative promoters, 4 alternative 3' ends and 13 alternative splicing events. (B) Androgens drive a promoter switch in the LIG4 gene, which produces an mRNA isoform with an alternative 5’UTR. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the LIG4 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce a different 5’UTR without influencing the protein sequence (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate that in response to androgens there is repression of promoter 1 and induction of promoter 2 (right panel). (C) Androgens drive alternative splicing of the ZNF678 gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the ZNF678 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch to inclusion of a cassette exon in the presence of androgens. Inclusion of the alternative cassette exon in the ZNF678 gene is predicted to induce a switch to an alternative non-coding mRNA isoform (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers in flanking exons confirmed increased inclusion of the alternative exon in LNCaP cells exposed to androgens (right panel). (D) Androgens promote selection of an alternative 3’ end for the MAT2A gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the MAT2A gene on the UCSC genome browser indicates a switch to reduced usage of an alternative 3’ end in the presence of androgens (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each isoform confirmed down-regulation of an alternative 3’ end (p<0.01). Alternative 3’ ends for the MAT2A gene are predicted to produce proteins with different amino acid sequences and to influence a known Pfam domain (right panel).

Androgen regulated events control the production of alternative protein isoforms, non-coding RNAs and alternative 5' UTRs

48/73 (66%) of the androgen regulated alternative events detected in response to androgen stimulation are predicted to change the amino acid sequence of the resulting protein ( Table 1). Some of these are already known to have a well characterised role in prostate cancer progression, including an alternative promoter in the oncogene TPD52 that produces a protein isoform called PrLZ ( Figure 2A) [46– 49]. Others are not so well characterised. Using western blotting we could detect a novel shorter protein isoform corresponding to androgen-driven selection of an alternative promoter in the TACC2 gene ( Figure 2B); and exclusion of a cassette exon in the NDUFV3 gene, which we show also produces a novel shorter protein isoform ( Figure 2C). We also detected a switch in the 3' end of the mRNA transcript for the MAT2A gene, which is predicted to produce a protein isoform with a shorter C-terminal domain ( Figure 1D); and induction of an alternative 3' isoform of CNNM2, which is predicted to be missing a conserved CBS domain ( Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1).
Figure 2.

Androgen regulated mRNA isoform switches control alternative protein isoforms and non-coding RNAs.

( A) Androgens induce an alternative promoter in the oncogene TPD52 that produces an isoform called PrLZ. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the TPD52 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is known to produce an alternative protein isoform of TPD52 known as PrLZ (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate an induction of the PrLZ isoform in response to androgens (middle panel). PrLZ has an alternative N-terminal amino acid sequence which results in an alternative protein isoform and disrupts a known Pfam domain (right panel). ( B) Androgens induce an alternative promoter in the TACC2 gene that produces a novel alternative protein isoform. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the TACC2 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce an alternative shorter protein isoform of TACC2 (isoform 2) (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate a switch from isoform 1 to isoform 2 in response to androgens (middle panel). Detection of TACC2 protein in LNCaP by western blotting (cells were grown with or without androgens for 24 or 48 hours). Tubulin was used as a loading control. Exposure to androgens for 48 hours induces expression of the alternative TACC2 protein isoform (right panel). ( C) Androgens drive alternative splicing of the NDUFV3 gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the NDUFV3 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch to exclusion of a cassette exon in the presence of androgens (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers in flanking exons confirmed less inclusion of the alternative exon in LNCaP cells exposed to androgens (middle panel). Exclusion of the alternative cassette exon is predicted to produce an alternative protein isoform. Detection of NDUFV3 protein in LNCaP cells using western blotting (right panel). ( D) Androgens suppress an alternative promoter in the RLN2 gene, which produces a shorter non-coding mRNA isoform. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the RLN2 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce an untranslated non-coding mRNA isoform (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicated a significant switch in promoter usage in response to androgens (middle panel). Detection of RLN2 protein in LNCaP by western blotting (cells were grown with or without androgens for 48 hours). Actin was used as a loading control. As seen previously [55], androgens suppress RLN2 protein levels.

Androgen regulated mRNA isoform switches control alternative protein isoforms and non-coding RNAs.

( A) Androgens induce an alternative promoter in the oncogene TPD52 that produces an isoform called PrLZ. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the TPD52 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is known to produce an alternative protein isoform of TPD52 known as PrLZ (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate an induction of the PrLZ isoform in response to androgens (middle panel). PrLZ has an alternative N-terminal amino acid sequence which results in an alternative protein isoform and disrupts a known Pfam domain (right panel). ( B) Androgens induce an alternative promoter in the TACC2 gene that produces a novel alternative protein isoform. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the TACC2 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce an alternative shorter protein isoform of TACC2 (isoform 2) (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicate a switch from isoform 1 to isoform 2 in response to androgens (middle panel). Detection of TACC2 protein in LNCaP by western blotting (cells were grown with or without androgens for 24 or 48 hours). Tubulin was used as a loading control. Exposure to androgens for 48 hours induces expression of the alternative TACC2 protein isoform (right panel). ( C) Androgens drive alternative splicing of the NDUFV3 gene. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the NDUFV3 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch to exclusion of a cassette exon in the presence of androgens (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers in flanking exons confirmed less inclusion of the alternative exon in LNCaP cells exposed to androgens (middle panel). Exclusion of the alternative cassette exon is predicted to produce an alternative protein isoform. Detection of NDUFV3 protein in LNCaP cells using western blotting (right panel). ( D) Androgens suppress an alternative promoter in the RLN2 gene, which produces a shorter non-coding mRNA isoform. Visualisation of our LNCaP cell RNA-seq reads for the RLN2 gene on the UCSC genome browser identified a switch from promoter 1 to alternative promoter 2 in cells grown in the presence of androgens. Promoter 2 is predicted to produce an untranslated non-coding mRNA isoform (left panel). Quantitative PCR using primers specific to each promoter indicated a significant switch in promoter usage in response to androgens (middle panel). Detection of RLN2 protein in LNCaP by western blotting (cells were grown with or without androgens for 48 hours). Actin was used as a loading control. As seen previously [55], androgens suppress RLN2 protein levels. 11 of the remaining identified androgen-regulated alternative events change the expression of mRNAs from coding to non-coding or untranslated (not predicted to produce a protein) ( Table 1). These included promoter switches for the RLN1 and RLN2 genes which encode peptide hormones that may be important in prostate cancer [5, 50– 55]. Androgens drive a promoter switch in both RLN1 and RLN2 to produce predicted non-coding or untranslated mRNA isoforms, reducing expression of protein-coding RLN1 and RLN2 mRNA isoforms. To test whether prostate cancer cells turn off gene expression by switching between utilisation of promoters that generate coding and noncoding mRNAs, we analysed RLN2 protein levels. Consistent with our hypothesis and a previous study [55], RLN2 protein production was negatively regulated by androgens in parallel to the switch to the non-coding mRNA isoform ( Figure 2D). 14 of the identified androgen-dependent mRNA isoforms lead to/result in coding mRNAs with altered 5’ untranslated regions (5′ UTR) with no impact on the coding sequence. These include a promoter switch in the LIG4 gene ( Figure 1B).

Differential expression of androgen-dependent mRNA isoforms in prostate adenocarcinoma versus normal tissue

To investigate potential links between androgen-dependent mRNA isoforms and tumourigenesis, we analysed the expression of 41 androgen-regulated mRNA isoform pairs in clinical prostate adenocarcinoma and normal prostate tissues. This analysis utilised transcriptomic data from 497 tumour samples and 52 normal samples in the PRAD TCGA cohort [104]. The remaining isoform pairs identified within our dataset have not been previously annotated by UCSC, therefore it was not possible to include them in our comparison. A description of the cohort used is summarised in Table 4.
Table 4.

Description of the TCGA PRAD cohort.

FeaturesTotal Cases
Cohort497 patients
Tumour 497
Normal52 (w/tumour matched sample available)
Gleason grade
650
7287
867
9140
104
Tumour stage
T2a14
T2b10
T2c192
T3a173
T3b140
T412
Gleason grade (alternative gleason grade grouping)
1 (primary + secondary score ≤ 6)50
2 (3 + 4)171
3 (4 + 3)123
4 (4 + 4)93
5 (primary + secondary score ≥ 9)111

All tumours were hormone naive (not subject to ADT) at the time of sample collection

All tumours were hormone naive (not subject to ADT) at the time of sample collection 33 of the 42 mRNA isoform pairs exhibited significant differences in the expression of at least one of the isoforms, or in the isoform expression ratio between tumour and normal tissues ( Table 5). 13 of those tumour-specific alterations mimicked the effect of androgen stimulation in LNCaP cells: the changes were in form of alternative promoters for TACC2, TPD52, NUP93, PIK3R1, RDH13, ZFAND6, CDIP1, YIF1B, LIMK2, and FDFT1; an alternative 3´ end in CNNM2; and alternative exons in NDUFV3 and SS18 ( Figure 3, Table 5 & Supplementary Figure 2). Two of the alternative promoters ( ZFAND6 and CDIP1) are predicted to introduce a change in the 5′UTR, whereas all the others are predicted to alter the resulting protein isoform. A number of mRNA isoforms that were androgen responsive in LNCaP cells showed tumour specific alterations opposite to the effect of androgen stimulation. These were LIG4, MAPRE2, OSBPL1A, SEPT5, NR4A1, and RCAN1 (all predicted to alter the resulting protein isoform except LIG4). For the remaining 14 mRNA isoform pairs, the data was inconclusive according to the consistency conditions listed in the methods section ( Table 5).
Table 5.

Summarised results of the differential expression analysis of androgen-regulated isoforms between tumour and normal tissue samples in the TCGA PRAD cohort.

Isoform 1Isoform 2PSI
GeneEvent typeChange with androgens (LNCap)log2FCAv.Expr. (TPM)FDRlog2FCAv.Expr. (TPM)FDRDelta PSIAv. PSIFDRConsistency of change in tumours
LIG4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2 -0.81 1.77 4.31E-02 -1.53 1.28 4.48E-05 0.06 0.597300667 9.85E-02 Opposite
TACC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.80 2.42 5.51E-03 0.186.226.06E-01 -0.16 0.284239843 2.95E-05 Consistent
TPD52 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.340.175.45E-01 1.87 39.20 1.23E-09 0.000.0113653088.11E-06 Consistent
NUP93 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1 0.25 25.52 6.45E-04 0.317.206.08E-010.010.8287386697.52E-01 Consistent
RLN1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.45133.504.97E-01------------ Not assessed
AP2S1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.48191.442.24E-05------------ Not assessed
RLN2 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 10.485.072.41E-01------------ Not assessed
PIK3R1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -1.79 7.15 3.26E-12 -1.79 1.26 8.20E-06 -0.020.8202821857.52E-01 Consistent
MAPRE2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 21.171.521.22E-01-0.340.071.96E-01 0.09 0.730349729 4.67E-02 Opposite
NDUFAF4 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.550.065.86E-02------------ Not assessed
DCXR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.68623.072.05E-05------------ Not assessed
PEX10 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.9275.557.84E-06------------ Not assessed
SNAPC2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.385.421.23E-01 0.22 37.58 3.20E-02 -0.010.1305831068.29E-01Inconclusive
ATP6V0D1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.12109.861.42E-01------------ Not assessed
ARRDC1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.4612.782.34E-05------------ Not assessed
DENND1A Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.047.099.11E-01------------ Not assessed
KLHL36 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.3810.584.61E-06------------ Not assessed
RAB3IL1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.340.285.07E-010.054.686.91E-010.010.0626739844.28E-01Inconclusive
ACER3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.136.328.52E-01------------ Not assessed
OSBPL1A Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.144.115.75E-01 -1.06 3.56 3.44E-09 0.17 0.522207286 1.03E-08 Opposite
TRIM16 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.656.871.03E-14------------ Not assessed
VSIG10L Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-1.011.915.49E-04------------ Not assessed
SEPT5 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.80 11.47 1.79E-09 1.09 3.86 1.82E-06 -0.030.7496153581.90E-01 Opposite
HMGCR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.860.591.07E-01 -0.55 17.41 1.09E-02 0.000.0291052959.62E-01Inconclusive
RDH13 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1 1.67 2.10 1.31E-08 0.72 0.05 5.88E-03 0.000.9621554419.33E-02 Consistent
GPRIN2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -------0.483.313.98E-02------ Not assessed
CLK3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.1031.341.07E-01--0.04--0.000.9985379296.18E-01Inconclusive
RNH1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.164.387.95E-01-0.196.565.74E-010.000.3753681517.52E-01Inconclusive
ZFAND6 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.1037.636.33E-01 -1.51 2.29 5.59E-03 0.03 0.935657481 3.73E-02 Consistent
CDIP1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.770.351.16E-01 -1.83 3.70 2.77E-11 0.06 0.142411928 1.46E-03 Consistent
YIF1B Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.502.523.18E-01 2.83 3.08 1.60E-04 -0.32 0.497841217 1.64E-02 Consistent
LIMK2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2 -0.90 6.80 1.50E-03 0.58 10.99 1.10E-05 -0.19 0.382613244 2.85E-06 Consistent
TSC22D3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 --35.48-- -1.08 173.59 8.13E-15 0.010.2030192772.97E-01Inconclusive
ALDH1A3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.71279.097.51E-03------------ Not assessed
TRABD Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2 1.57 21.80 3.42E-02 0.870.541.18E-010.000.9585019415.17E-01Inconclusive
LIMCH1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 --0.01-------------- Not assessed
GMFB Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.1111.917.54E-01------------ Not assessed
MLST8 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 1 0.87 0.19 9.88E-04 1.51 4.90 9.60E-03 0.020.1212413995.81E-01Inconclusive
TLE3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.100.108.70E-01-0.205.144.28E-010.000.025626046.14E-01Inconclusive
UBA1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.2123.511.39E-010.01131.719.46E-010.010.1900099642.99E-01Inconclusive
TNRC6B Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.18 2.27 3.34E-02 -0.430.034.15E-010.000.9885930613.56E-02Inconclusive
FDFT1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.57 94.14 1.13E-07 -1.07 1.05 5.62E-12 0.000.9866427572.13E-02 Consistent
GREB1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2 1.45 1.01 6.45E-04 0.281.483.21E-01 0.14 0.378280864 3.40E-02 Inconclusive
NCAPD3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.1675.756.55E-01------------ Not assessed
SLC36A4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.912.151.60E-03------------ Not assessed
KLC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.470.274.16E-01-0.763.648.12E-020.000.10484054.53E-01Inconclusive
RAP1GAP Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 1.943.423.45E-08------------ Not assessed
TMEM79 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.213.777.91E-01 -1.40 1.67 2.05E-05 0.190.3994435445.07E-02Inconclusive
NR4A1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.401.862.34E-01 -0.74 5.81 7.87E-03 0.060.2927530452.53E-01 Opposite
ZNF32 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.0367.267.14E-010.034.127.14E-010.000.9424465411.00E+00Inconclusive
C1QTNF3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.303.414.67E-01------------ Not assessed
UBE2D3 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2 -0.50 8.00 5.09E-04 -0.130.328.18E-01-0.010.9534130555.49E-01Inconclusive
KRT8 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.082.088.55E-01 0.48 697.27 1.26E-05 0.000.0034554799.85E-02Inconclusive
ELOVL1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.10100.071.38E-01------------ Not assessed
RCAN1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.311.394.66E-01 -1.40 6.90 4.40E-07 0.09 0.2372612 1.64E-02 Opposite
SORBS3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.216.336.20E-01------------ Not assessed
MAT2A Alternative 3' end Repression of isoform 2-0.36102.476.63E-020.2713.412.87E-01 -0.03 0.888519015 5.32E-03 Inconclusive
CNNM2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 1 0.67 0.44 2.73E-05 -0.79 1.22 5.96E-03 0.13 0.331082656 3.31E-05 Consistent
TMEM125 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 1------0.4540.709.40E-04------ Not assessed
CBWD2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 20.0016.569.88E-01------------ Not assessed
NDUFV3 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.0912.982.36E-01 0.54 56.19 4.17E-07 -0.07 0.201011 2.54E-08 Consistent
ZNF678 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.320.972.23E-01------------ Not assessed
ZNF121 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) 0.90 0.08 5.97E-03 0.023.099.28E-010.000.0378998589.85E-02Inconclusive
SPATC1L Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)0.3536.984.71E-02------------ Not assessed
MOCOS Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.822.241.14E-09------------ Not assessed
RBM45 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon included)0.257.859.96E-07------------ Not assessed
MIPEP Alternative exon Repression of isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.8749.009.53E-04------------ Not assessed
BBS4 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)0.0221.639.71E-01------------ Not assessed
FAM195A Alternative exon Switch to isoform 1 (exon exluded) 0.87 43.81 4.03E-08 0.99 5.57 1.01E-08 -0.010.8845638812.50E-01Inconclusive
LINC01133 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 1 (exon excluded)-------1.582.771.39E-080.00---- Not assessed
SS18 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-1.473.701.97E-02-0.1433.311.18E-02 -0.07 0.087763421 2.88E-02 Consistent
RHOC Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) 0.62 1.48 3.71E-06 0.13153.201.96E-010.000.0098302191.46E-03Inconclusive
ZNF226 Retained intron Switch to isoform 1 (intron included)-0.132.485.37E-01-0.0813.497.40E-01-0.010.1845222238.77E-01Inconclusive
Figure 3.

Differential expression of androgen dependent mRNA isoforms in prostate cancer versus normal tissue within the PRAD TCGA cohort for TPD52, TACC2, NDUFV3 and CNNM2.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio in PSI (right panel) in normal and tumour samples. The mean log2 fold-change (logFC) in expression between tumour and normal samples and the associated FDR-adjusted p-value for the moderated t-statistic of differential expression are shown for both isoforms (left and central panels). The mean difference in PSI (deltaPSI) between tumour and normal samples and the associated FDR-adjusted p-value for the Mann-Whitney U test of differential splicing are shown (right panel).

Differential expression of androgen dependent mRNA isoforms in prostate cancer versus normal tissue within the PRAD TCGA cohort for TPD52, TACC2, NDUFV3 and CNNM2.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio in PSI (right panel) in normal and tumour samples. The mean log2 fold-change (logFC) in expression between tumour and normal samples and the associated FDR-adjusted p-value for the moderated t-statistic of differential expression are shown for both isoforms (left and central panels). The mean difference in PSI (deltaPSI) between tumour and normal samples and the associated FDR-adjusted p-value for the Mann-Whitney U test of differential splicing are shown (right panel).

Changes in androgen-dependent mRNA isoform expression during tumour progression

We next investigated whether the identified androgen-dependent mRNA isoforms are differentially expressed during prostate cancer progression by correlating the expression levels of each isoform with Gleason scores and prostate tumour grades within the PRAD TCGA cohort ( Figure 4 & Figure 5, Table 6 & Table 7 and Supplementary Figure 3 & Supplementary Figure 4). For 6 of the alternative mRNA isoforms responsive to androgens (made from alternative promoters in LIG4, OSBPL1A, CLK3, TSC22D3 & ZNF32 and utilising an alternative exon in ZNF121), the expression changed significantly with Gleason score and showed specific alterations consistent with the effect of androgen stimulation. Conversely, 9 alternative isoforms (which were androgen responsive in LNCaP cells) showed tumour specific alterations opposite to the effect of androgen stimulation (including an alternative promoters in NUP93 and the alternative 3´end of MAT2A). 3 androgen regulated mRNA isoforms ( OSBPL1A, CLK3 and TSC22D3) change significantly with both Gleason grade and tumour stage.
Figure 4.

Differential alternative mRNA isoform expression in the TGCA PRAD cohort across different Gleason grades for OSBPL1A, CLK3, TSC22D and ZNF121.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio (right panel) by Gleason grade. Their respective Spearman’s correlation coefficient (Rho) with grade and associated FDR-adjusted p-value are shown.

Figure 5.

Differential alternative mRNA isoform expression in the TGCA PRAD cohort across different tumour stages for OSBPL1A, CLK3 and TSC22D3.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio (right panel) by tumour stage. Their respective Spearman’s correlation coefficient (Rho) with stage and associated FDR-adjusted p-value are shown.

Table 6.

Summarised results of the correlation analysis of androgen-regulated isoforms expression with Gleason score in the TCGA PRAD cohort.

Isoform 1 Isoform 2 PSI
GeneEvent typeChange with androgens (LNCap)RhoFDRRhoFDRRhoFDRConsistency of change with Gleason
LIG4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.071.92E-01 0.09 1.07E-01 -0.18 4.21E-04 Consistent -
TACC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.081.55E-010.019.26E-01-0.081.88E-01Inconclusive
TPD52 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.009.51E-010.027.73E-010.009.46E-01Inconclusive
NUP93 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1 -0.18 7.92E-04 -0.071.81E-010.044.75E-01 Opposite
RLN1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.161.98E-03-------- Not assessed
AP2S1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.018.72E-01-------- Not assessed
RLN2 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.106.03E-02-------- Not assessed
PIK3R1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.072.51E-010.091.20E-01-0.171.29E-03Inconclusive
MAPRE2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2-0.071.92E-01-0.062.73E-010.063.23E-01Inconclusive
NDUFAF4 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.009.79E-01-------- Not assessed
DCXR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.294.07E-09-------- Not assessed
PEX10 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.081.50E-01-------- Not assessed
SNAPC2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2 0.15 5.48E-03 -0.18 3.55E-04 0.21 5.13E-05 Opposite
ATP6V0D1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.113.43E-02-------- Not assessed
ARRDC1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.122.00E-02-------- Not assessed
DENND1A Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.028.10E-01-------- Not assessed
KLHL36 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.131.67E-02-------- Not assessed
RAB3IL1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.063.17E-01 0.32 9.13E-12 -0.027.15E-01 Opposite
ACER3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.163.79E-03-------- Not assessed
OSBPL1A Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.054.00E-01 0.13 1.58E-02 -0.072.33E-01 Consistent
TRIM16 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.106.06E-02-------- Not assessed
VSIG10L Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.161.98E-03-------- Not assessed
SEPT5 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.171.12E-03 0.12 1.93E-02 -0.044.91E-01 Opposite
HMGCR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.036.56E-01-0.054.54E-010.072.33E-01Inconclusive
RDH13 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 10.037.01E-010.081.20E-01-0.101.00E-01Inconclusive
GPRIN2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -----0.018.93E-01---- Not assessed
CLK3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.13 1.58E-02 -0.053.98E-010.072.33E-01 Consistent
RNH1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 10.054.41E-010.071.83E-01-0.019.23E-01Inconclusive
ZFAND6 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.071.87E-010.053.82E-01-0.036.36E-01Inconclusive
CDIP1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.028.10E-010.036.81E-01-0.019.23E-01Inconclusive
YIF1B Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.028.10E-01-0.045.42E-010.054.39E-01Inconclusive
LIMK2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2-0.028.10E-01-0.036.30E-010.009.49E-01Inconclusive
TSC22D3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.15 5.15E-03 -0.019.26E-01-0.091.14E-01 Consistent
ALDH1A3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.122.00E-02-------- Not assessed
TRABD Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.148.04E-03-0.045.43E-010.054.39E-01Inconclusive
LIMCH1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.054.34E-01-------- Not assessed
GMFB Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.081.55E-01-------- Not assessed
MLST8 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 10.195.32E-040.192.05E-040.072.14E-01Inconclusive
TLE3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.054.28E-01-0.107.19E-020.072.33E-01Inconclusive
UBA1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.098.99E-020.035.95E-010.018.68E-01Inconclusive
TNRC6B Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.054.00E-01-0.091.19E-010.091.11E-01Inconclusive
FDFT1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.027.41E-010.072.07E-01-0.072.14E-01Inconclusive
GREB1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.054.41E-01 -0.14 5.45E-03 0.044.60E-01 Opposite
NCAPD3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.233.61E-06-------- Not assessed
SLC36A4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.121.88E-02-------- Not assessed
KLC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.028.10E-010.131.58E-02-0.044.60E-01Inconclusive
RAP1GAP Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.018.79E-01-------- Not assessed
TMEM79 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.044.70E-010.153.46E-03-0.091.11E-01Inconclusive
NR4A1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.105.44E-020.009.79E-010.107.40E-02Inconclusive
ZNF32 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.22 1.32E-05 -0.22 1.11E-05 -0.091.31E-01 Consistent -
C1QTNF3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 10.081.58E-01-------- Not assessed
UBE2D3 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.187.24E-040.081.27E-01-0.027.15E-01Inconclusive
KRT8 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.053.81E-01-0.162.07E-030.018.68E-01Inconclusive
ELOVL1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.187.24E-04-------- Not assessed
RCAN1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.105.13E-02-0.018.70E-010.123.69E-02Inconclusive
SORBS3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.122.21E-02-------- Not assessed
MAT2A Alternative 3' end Repression of isoform 20.045.39E-01 0.27 3.68E-08 -0.33 8.82E-13 Opposite
CNNM2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 1-0.063.30E-010.035.87E-01-0.082.04E-01Inconclusive
TMEM125 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 1-----0.192.05E-04---- Not assessed
CBWD2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 20.131.37E-02-------- Not assessed
NDUFV3 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) 0.14 8.04E-03 -0.072.48E-01 0.13 2.23E-02 Opposite
ZNF678 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.071.87E-01-------- Not assessed
ZNF121 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) -0.13 1.63E-02 0.081.20E-01 -0.14 1.27E-02 Consistent
SPATC1L Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)-0.131.58E-02-------- Not assessed
MOCOS Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.018.72E-01-------- Not assessed
RBM45 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon included)0.122.45E-02-------- Not assessed
MIPEP Alternative exon Repression of isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.149.92E-03-------- Not assessed
BBS4 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)-0.081.87E-01-------- Not assessed
FAM195A Alternative exon Switch to isoform 1 (exon exluded)0.045.43E-010.145.35E-03 -0.18 4.65E-04 Opposite
LINC01133 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 1 (exon excluded)-----0.027.51E-01---- Not assessed
SS18 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.044.86E-01-0.062.51E-010.072.33E-01Inconclusive
RHOC Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded) 0.29 4.07E-09 0.154.24E-03 0.21 3.63E-05 Opposite
ZNF226 Retained intron Switch to isoform 1 (intron included)0.018.67E-01-0.107.49E-020.116.74E-02Inconclusive
Table 7.

Summarised results of the correlation analysis of androgen-regulated isoforms expression with tumour stage in the TCGA PRAD cohort (related to Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 5).

Isoform 1 Isoform 2 PSI
GeneEvent typeChange with androgens (LNCap)RhoFDRRhoFDRRhoFDRConsistency of change with stage
LIG4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.046.05E-010.026.82E-01-0.091.82E-01Inconclusive
TACC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.081.74E-01-0.054.47E-01-0.045.65E-01Inconclusive
TPD52 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.027.85E-01-0.026.82E-01-0.027.95E-01Inconclusive
NUP93 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1 -0.12 3.95E-02 0.036.65E-01-0.054.43E-01 Opposite
RLN1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.221.82E-05-------- Not assessed
AP2S1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.045.51E-01-------- Not assessed
RLN2 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.165.68E-03-------- Not assessed
PIK3R1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.027.92E-01 0.11 5.92E-02 -0.14 3.27E-02 Opposite -
MAPRE2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2-0.027.56E-01-0.026.82E-010.031.00E+00Inconclusive
NDUFAF4 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.081.89E-01-------- Not assessed
DCXR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.306.32E-10-------- Not assessed
PEX10 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.109.95E-02-------- Not assessed
SNAPC2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2 0.13 2.87E-02 -0.23 5.57E-06 0.20 2.40E-04 Opposite
ATP6V0D1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.115.43E-02-------- Not assessed
ARRDC1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.082.06E-01-------- Not assessed
DENND1A Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.018.49E-01-------- Not assessed
KLHL36 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.101.04E-01-------- Not assessed
RAB3IL1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.081.71E-01 0.33 4.58E-12 0.009.75E-01 Opposite
ACER3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.164.77E-03-------- Not assessed
OSBPL1A Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.045.38E-01 0.13 1.59E-02 -0.072.88E-01 Consistent
TRIM16 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.063.95E-01-------- Not assessed
VSIG10L Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.125.43E-02-------- Not assessed
SEPT5 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.117.96E-020.072.54E-01-0.018.89E-01Inconclusive
HMGCR Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.009.91E-01-0.045.77E-010.046.25E-01Inconclusive
RDH13 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.037.33E-010.107.19E-02-0.129.32E-02Inconclusive
GPRIN2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 ----0.036.48E-01---- Not assessed
CLK3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.15 6.05E-03 0.027.76E-010.028.63E-01 Consistent
RNH1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 1-0.027.92E-010.106.12E-02-0.082.28E-01Inconclusive
ZFAND6 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.036.50E-010.045.78E-01-0.046.05E-01Inconclusive
CDIP1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.101.04E-010.027.82E-010.063.78E-01Inconclusive
YIF1B Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 2-0.018.87E-01-0.106.71E-020.063.97E-01Inconclusive
LIMK2 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.009.67E-01-0.054.72E-010.009.75E-01Inconclusive
TSC22D3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.13 3.44E-02 -0.072.54E-01-0.036.59E-01 Consistent
ALDH1A3 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.187.69E-04-------- Not assessed
TRABD Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.063.95E-01-0.036.48E-010.037.83E-01Inconclusive
LIMCH1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 0.027.85E-01-------- Not assessed
GMFB Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.072.57E-01-------- Not assessed
MLST8 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 10.108.19E-020.156.14E-030.027.83E-01Inconclusive
TLE3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.036.38E-01 -0.11 3.84E-02 0.045.65E-01 Opposite
UBA1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.125.43E-020.009.72E-010.063.99E-01Inconclusive
TNRC6B Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.046.31E-01-0.036.48E-010.027.83E-01Inconclusive
FDFT1 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.054.82E-010.045.46E-01-0.082.28E-01Inconclusive
GREB1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.117.48E-02 -0.18 7.01E-04 0.018.96E-01 Opposite
NCAPD3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 2-0.231.82E-05-------- Not assessed
SLC36A4 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.072.59E-01-------- Not assessed
KLC2 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.036.33E-010.131.81E-02-0.082.78E-01Inconclusive
RAP1GAP Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 0.027.85E-01-------- Not assessed
TMEM79 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.081.71E-010.161.97E-03-0.101.20E-01Inconclusive
NR4A1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.018.49E-01-0.063.69E-010.082.62E-01Inconclusive
ZNF32 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 2 -0.156.70E-030.027.34E-01-0.082.33E-01Inconclusive
C1QTNF3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 10.036.74E-01-------- Not assessed
UBE2D3 Alternative promoter Switch to promoter 20.202.96E-040.072.17E-01-0.027.83E-01Inconclusive
KRT8 Alternative promoter Repression of promoter 1 -0.046.05E-01-0.242.72E-060.046.05E-01Inconclusive
ELOVL1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.132.87E-02-------- Not assessed
RCAN1 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.091.26E-01-0.018.69E-010.101.20E-01Inconclusive
SORBS3 Alternative promoter Induction of promoter 20.117.96E-02-------- Not assessed
MAT2A Alternative 3' end Repression of isoform 20.019.35E-01 0.18 7.83E-04 -0.21 8.42E-05 Opposite
CNNM2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 10.053.95E-010.054.47E-01-0.046.05E-01Inconclusive
TMEM125 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 1-----0.162.80E-03---- Not assessed
CBWD2 Alternative 3' end Induction of isoform 20.081.74E-01-------- Not assessed
NDUFV3 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.117.48E-02-0.054.72E-010.111.00E-01Inconclusive
ZNF678 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.027.43E-01-------- Not assessed
ZNF121 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.081.80E-010.036.48E-01-0.091.82E-01Inconclusive
SPATC1L Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)-0.109.95E-02-------- Not assessed
MOCOS Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.036.33E-01-------- Not assessed
RBM45 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon included)0.081.71E-01-------- Not assessed
MIPEP Alternative exon Repression of isoform 2 (exon excluded)-0.164.48E-03-------- Not assessed
BBS4 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 2 (exon included)-0.063.85E-01-------- Not assessed
FAM195A Alternative exon Switch to isoform 1 (exon exluded)0.063.37E-010.106.85E-02-0.101.20E-01Inconclusive
LINC01133 Alternative exon Induction of isoform 1 (exon excluded)----0.009.72E-01---- Not assessed
SS18 Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.045.68E-01-0.045.46E-010.063.97E-01Inconclusive
RHOC Alternative exon Switch to isoform 2 (exon excluded)0.156.05E-030.113.84E-020.111.00E-01Inconclusive
ZNF226 Retained intron Switch to isoform 1 (intron included)-0.036.64E-01-0.091.23E-010.073.35E-01Inconclusive

Differential alternative mRNA isoform expression in the TGCA PRAD cohort across different Gleason grades for OSBPL1A, CLK3, TSC22D and ZNF121.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio (right panel) by Gleason grade. Their respective Spearman’s correlation coefficient (Rho) with grade and associated FDR-adjusted p-value are shown.

Differential alternative mRNA isoform expression in the TGCA PRAD cohort across different tumour stages for OSBPL1A, CLK3 and TSC22D3.

Violin-boxplots of expression in transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM) of Isoforms 1 (left panel) and 2 (central panel), and of their expression ratio (right panel) by tumour stage. Their respective Spearman’s correlation coefficient (Rho) with stage and associated FDR-adjusted p-value are shown. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.

Discussion

The main function of the androgen receptor (AR) is as a DNA binding transcription factor that regulates gene expression. Here we show the AR can couple hormone induced gene transcription to alternative mRNA isoform expression in prostate cancer. In response to androgens, the AR can induce the use of alternative promoters, induce the expression of alternatively spliced mRNA isoforms, regulate the expression of non-coding mRNA transcripts, and promote the transcription of mRNA isoforms encoding different protein isoforms. Importantly, we also find that some of these alternative mRNA isoforms are differentially regulated in prostate cancer versus normal tissue and also significantly change expression during tumour progression. Our data suggest that most androgen regulated alternative mRNA isoforms are generated through alternative promoter selection rather than through internal alternative exon splicing mechanisms. This suggests expression of alternative isoforms of specific genes can be a consequence of RNA polymerase being recruited to different promoters in response to androgen stimulation. Alternative promoter usage has been observed for many genes and is believed to play a significant role in the control of gene expression [4, 105, 106]. Alternative promoter use can also generate mRNA isoforms with distinct functional activities from the same gene, sometimes having opposing functions [11]. Androgen exposure further drives a smaller number of alternative splicing events suggesting that the AR could contribute to altered patterns of splicing in prostate cancer cells. Tumour progression is believed to be associated with a coordinated change in splicing patterns which is regulated by several factors including signalling molecules [7]. We also identified 4 AR regulated alternative mRNA 3′ end isoform switches. This is the first time that regulation of 3′ mRNA end processing has been shown to be controlled by androgens. The selection of alternative 3′ ends can produce mRNA isoforms differing in the length of their 3′ UTRs (which can lead to the inclusion or exclusion of regulatory elements and influence gene expression), or in their C-terminal coding region (which can contribute to proteome diversity) [107– 114]. Defective 3′ mRNA processing of numerous genes has been linked to an oncogenic phenotype [115– 119], and the 3′ mRNA end profiles of samples from multiple cancer types significantly differ from those of healthy tissue samples [115, 119– 121]. Based on the findings presented in this study, we propose that activated AR has the ability to coordinate both transcriptional activity and mRNA isoform decisions through the recruitment of co-regulators to specific promoters. The genomic action of the AR is influenced by a large number of collaborating transcription factors [122– 124]. Specifically, Sam68 and p68 have been shown to modulate AR dependent alternative splicing of specific genes and are significantly overexpressed in prostate cancer [31, 32]. In future work it will be important to define the role of specific AR co-regulators in AR mediated isoform selection. Some of the androgen dependent mRNA isoforms identified here are predicted to yield protein isoforms that may be clinically important, or to switch off protein production via generation of noncoding mRNA isoforms. Although the functional significance of the alternative mRNA isoforms identified in this study is yet largely unexplored, as is their role in the cellular response to androgens, the presented results emphasize the importance of analysing gene regulation and function at the mRNA isoform level.

Data availability

The data referenced by this article are under copyright with the following copyright statement: Copyright: © 2018 Munkley J et al. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). The RNASeq data from LNCaP cells has been published previously https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.018 [25] The RNAseq custom tracks are available in Supplementary File 1. To view these files please load them onto the UCSC website using the ‘My data’ tab and ‘custom tracks’. Then ‘Paste URLs or data’. The data is aligned to Feb 2009 (GRCh37/hg19). Prostate adenocarcinoma cohort RNA-Seq data was downloaded from the Broad Institute TCGA Genome Analysis Center: Firehose 16/01/28 run https://doi.org/10.7908/C11G0KM9 [43] Dataset 1: Real-time PCR raw Ct values 10.5256/f1000research.15604.d212873 [41] Dataset 2: Raw unedited western blot images 10.5256/f1000research.15604.d212874 [125] Prostate cancer is a common cancer in men that is driven in part through deregulated androgen signalling. The importance of androgen inhibitors in prostate cancer therapy and the clinical challenges posed by the development of androgen-resistant disease both justify the detailed description of the effects of androgen treatment on gene transcription and alternative splicing in prostate cancer cells. In this sense, the analyses reported by Munkley and colleagues represent valuable additions to the literature. However, further explanation of the results presented would increase the reader’s ability to understand these results and their significance, and to identify which results should be prioritised for further research. I have therefore provided some specific suggestions to increase the accessibility of the data as they are currently presented. Specific comments The genes shown in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 5 are not shown in alphabetical order. It is unclear how these genes are ranked and why they are shown in the orders displayed. It would be helpful for any groupings of genes to be more clearly displayed in these tables where this is relevant. It would be helpful to more clearly indicate which findings are novel and which are supported by the literature in Tables and/or Figures. In Table 1, a number of genes are shown in bold, but this is not explained. In Table 1, it would be helpful to annotate the isoform ID’s shown (columns towards the right side of Table). What does “comparable” mean here? It is challenging to show data for a large number of genes, most of which the authors will not be familiar with. However, in Figure 2, incorrect information is shown for the TPD52 gene (panel A). The PrLZ isoform is actually longer than the TPD52 isoform (through an extended N-terminal sequence specific to PrLZ), yet the sizes of these isoforms indicated in the diagram at the right have been switched (TPD52 is incorrectly shown to be the longer isoform). The authors should check whether this is an isolated error or whether other data for the TPD52 and PrLZ isoforms have been switched (for example in Figure 3). It would be helpful for Table 4 to include percentages as well as sample numbers so that readers can compare the composition of the TCGA PRAD cohort with other published cohorts. Analyses compared differential isoform expression in prostate cancer and normal tissue. The cohort included 497 prostate cancer patients, for which 52 had matched normal tissue (Table 5, Figure 3). I’ve assumed that these analyses compared transcript levels in the 497 prostate cancer cases with those in the 52 normal tissue cases. However, given that the 52 normal tissue cases had matched tumour samples available, were analyses conducted to compare the 52 matched cases? These analyses could be argued to be more robust through comparing matched samples, albeit in a smaller cohort. Table 5 should indicate the numbers of tumour and normal tissue samples compared. Some data in Tables 5, 6, and 6 are shown in bold, but this is not explained. I could not open Dataset 2. Could this be made available as a pdf file? All violin plots (Figures 3-5, also supplementary data) should specify the sample numbers compared, either below the X axis or in the figure legend if the same sample numbers apply to every plot shown. I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. This paper by Munkley and colleagues identifies in a comprehensive manner novel alternative mRNA isoforms regulated by androgens. Interestingly most isoforms result from a choice between alternative promoters, suggesting that regulation takes place mostly at the transcriptional level, but they identified also a few alternative cassette exons and 3' ends. They show experimental validation for 17 isoforms. Beside increasing the number of identified genes in the context of androgen-treated prostate cancer LNCaP cells, the authors analysed the expression of those new isoforms in a large cohort of prostate tumours. They found the expression of some of the mRNA isoforms is positively correlated in the androgen-treated cell and in cancer versus normal samples, and find further correlation with the tumour grade and stage for 3 alternative isoforms. Overall this is an interesting work that clearly deserves to be published, as it reveals new potentially interesting target genes for prostate cancer. I have only a couple of comments/questions that may help to improve the strength of the manuscript. Did the authors try to experimentally validate the regulation of alternative isoforms for the 3 most interesting genes, i.e. OSBPL1A, CLK3 and TSC22D3, which is correlated to tumour stage ? As these new isoforms are predicted to alter the protein sequence, is it possible to discuss or predict what could be the impact of these modifications for these proteins, with regards to what is known about their function and/or in the context of prostate cancer? Looking at the RNA-seq profiles for the validated examples, it seems to me that in some cases, especially for RLN1 and RLN2, regulation of promoter choice correspond also to changes in the 3 end of the transcript (the peak seems to be shifted to the 3' end). Such examples may have escaped the in silico prediction, but can you make any comment on this ? I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Prostate cancer (PCa) is still a significant health problem in UK and across the world. Though a small minority of patients progress to aggressive forms, the absolute number is quite significant due to the high incidence of PCa among men. Therefore, investigation of molecular mechanisms of PCa progression is very important and will hopefully unravel novel therapeutic targets. Alternative splicing (AS) has been shown to occur in over 94% of genes in humans. It is therefore a crucial level of gene regulation and not surprisingly involved in virtually every physiological and pathological process. AS de-regulation has been implicated in many diseases, including cancer and in particular PCa, and interestingly, many times it has been shown to drive cancer pathology independently of transcription. Since androgens are main players in PCa, the idea of analysing global changes in AS in response to androgens is very welcome to the field. The authors found 10 times more AS isoforms regulated by androgens than previously reported in data from cell culture, most of them occurring through alternative promoter mechanism. They have confirmed and validated part of these changes. They have also analysed the isoforms changes between adenocarcinoma and normal tissues as well as during progression through the Gleason stages of PCa. This is a very well thought and executed study, with may informative results. I have a suggestion for the discussion part: one issue in global analysis of splice isoforms is which ones are causal (ie maintain and aggravate the phenotype) and which ones are just associated with the pathological progression; while a full answer to this would need experimental evidence on each individual splicing event, could the authors discuss 1-2 examples, if possible, where the changes at protein level (either sequence or expression level of a particular isoform) would hypothetically have a causal role I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
  122 in total

1.  Squalene synthase induces tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 enrichment in lipid rafts to promote lung cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Yang; Yi-Hua Jan; Yu-Peng Liu; Chih-Jen Yang; Chia-Yi Su; Yu-Chan Chang; Tsung-Ching Lai; Jean Chiou; Hong-Yuan Tsai; Jean Lu; Chia-Ning Shen; Jin-Yuh Shew; Pei-Jung Lu; Yuan-Feng Lin; Ming-Shyan Huang; Michael Hsiao
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Regulation of gene expression for translation initiation factor eIF-2 alpha: importance of the 3' untranslated region.

Authors:  S Miyamoto; J A Chiorini; E Urcelay; B Safer
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Expression of dicarbonyl/L-xylulose reductase (DCXR) in human skin and melanocytic lesions: morphological studies supporting cell adhesion function of DCXR.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Cho-Vega; Francisco Vega; Mary R Schwartz; Victor G Prieto
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.587

4.  The RNA-binding and adaptor protein Sam68 modulates signal-dependent splicing and transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  P Rajan; L Gaughan; C Dalgliesh; A El-Sherif; C N Robson; H Y Leung; D J Elliott
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  In vivo knockdown of the androgen receptor results in growth inhibition and regression of well-established, castration-resistant prostate tumors.

Authors:  Robert Snoek; Helen Cheng; Katia Margiotti; Latif A Wafa; Charmaine A Wong; Erica Chan Wong; Ladan Fazli; Colleen C Nelson; Martin E Gleave; Paul S Rennie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  TPD52 represents a survival factor in ERBB2-amplified breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Nuruliza Roslan; Ivan Bièche; Robert K Bright; Rosette Lidereau; Yuyan Chen; Jennifer A Byrne
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.784

7.  Expression of methionine adenosyltransferase 2A in renal cell carcinomas and potential mechanism for kidney carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Xuliang Wang; Xiaoqiang Guo; Wenshui Yu; Cailing Li; Yaoting Gui; Zhiming Cai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2017 update.

Authors:  Cath Tyner; Galt P Barber; Jonathan Casper; Hiram Clawson; Mark Diekhans; Christopher Eisenhart; Clayton M Fischer; David Gibson; Jairo Navarro Gonzalez; Luvina Guruvadoo; Maximilian Haeussler; Steve Heitner; Angie S Hinrichs; Donna Karolchik; Brian T Lee; Christopher M Lee; Parisa Nejad; Brian J Raney; Kate R Rosenbloom; Matthew L Speir; Chris Villarreal; John Vivian; Ann S Zweig; David Haussler; Robert M Kuhn; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Low penetrance susceptibility to glioma is caused by the TP53 variant rs78378222.

Authors:  V Enciso-Mora; F J Hosking; A L Di Stefano; D Zelenika; S Shete; P Broderick; A Idbaih; J-Y Delattre; K Hoang-Xuan; Y Marie; M Labussière; A Alentorn; P Ciccarino; M Rossetto; G Armstrong; Y Liu; K Gousias; J Schramm; C Lau; S J Hepworth; M Schoemaker; K Strauch; M Müller-Nurasyid; S Schreiber; A Franke; S Moebus; L Eisele; A Swerdlow; M Simon; M Bondy; M Lathrop; M Sanson; R S Houlston
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Role of relaxin-2 in human primary osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jinfeng Ma; Min Niu; Wenjiu Yang; Lina Zang; Yongming Xi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.722

View more
  4 in total

1.  Androgen-dependent alternative mRNA isoform expression in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Jennifer Munkley; Teresa M Maia; Nekane Ibarluzea; Karen E Livermore; Daniel Vodak; Ingrid Ehrmann; Katherine James; Prabhakar Rajan; Nuno L Barbosa-Morais; David J Elliott
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-03

2.  Androgen-regulated transcription of ESRP2 drives alternative splicing patterns in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Munkley; Ling Li; S R Gokul Krishnan; Gerald Hysenaj; Emma Scott; Caroline Dalgliesh; Htoo Zarni Oo; Teresa Mendes Maia; Kathleen Cheung; Ingrid Ehrmann; Karen E Livermore; Hanna Zielinska; Oliver Thompson; Bridget Knight; Paul McCullagh; John McGrath; Malcolm Crundwell; Lorna W Harries; Mads Daugaard; Simon Cockell; Nuno L Barbosa-Morais; Sebastian Oltean; David J Elliott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Transcript-targeted analysis reveals isoform alterations and double-hop fusions in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Namba; Toshihide Ueno; Shinya Kojima; Kenya Kobayashi; Katsushige Kawase; Yosuke Tanaka; Satoshi Inoue; Fumishi Kishigami; Shusuke Kawashima; Noriko Maeda; Tomoko Ogawa; Shoichi Hazama; Yosuke Togashi; Mizuo Ando; Yuichi Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Mano; Masahito Kawazu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-22

4.  Pan-cancer driver copy number alterations identified by joint expression/CNA data analysis.

Authors:  Gaojianyong Wang; Dimitris Anastassiou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.