Literature DB >> 30269897

The rationale for the primacy of coronary CT angiography in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline (CG95) for the investigation of chest pain of recent onset.

Andrew D Kelion1, Edward D Nicol2.   

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) provides independent evidence-based guidance for England's National Health Service. Its 2010 guideline for the "assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin" (CG95) recommended a variety of first-line investigations in stable patients, depending on the pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Following a limited review, NICE produced an updated version of CG95 in 2016. Formal calculation of PTP is no longer advised. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is recommended as the first-line investigation for all patients with angina (or non-anginal pain but an abnormal electrocardiogram) and no prior CAD, with second-line functional imaging if the CCTA is equivocal. Notwithstanding some controversies regarding NICE's methodology, the updated version of CG95 can be justified on several levels. The focus on angina reflects evidence that patients with non-anginal pain have a similar prevalence of CAD to an asymptomatic population, and may not benefit from further investigation. The elimination of PTP is reasonable in patients required to have cardiac-sounding (anginal) symptoms. The ability of CCTA to identify non-obstructive atheroma, invisible to functional testing, might lead to improved medical treatment. Conversely the argument sometimes made for first-line functional testing, that ischemia-guided coronary revascularization leads to improved outcomes, has little hard evidence to support it. The performance of a separate functional test following equivocal CCTA may improve diagnostic specificity, and similar information is now obtainable from the CT study itself via computational flow dynamics.
Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angina pectoris; Chest pain; Coronary CT angiography; Guideline; NICE; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; Stable coronary artery disease

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30269897     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery calcium scoring in individuals at risk for coronary artery disease: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marleen Vonder; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of NICE and ESC proposed strategies on new onset chest pain and the contemporary clinical utility of pretest probability risk score.

Authors:  Alexandros Papachristidis; George Frederick Vaughan; Sarah J Denny; Tamim Akbari; Edith Avornyo; Tracey Griffiths; Emma Saunders; Jonathan Byrne; Mark J Monaghan; Khaled Al Fakih
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-05

3.  The effect of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve on the management of decision making for patients with stable chest pain (TARGET trial): objective, rationale, and design.

Authors:  Junjie Yang; Dongkai Shan; Mei Dong; Zhiqiang Wang; Xiang Ma; Xinyang Hu; Hesong Zeng; Yundai Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Future Directions in Coronary CT Angiography: CT-Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Vulnerability, and Quantitative Plaque Assessment.

Authors:  Fernando Uliana Kay; Arzu Canan; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Relationship of Stress Test Findings to Anatomic or Functional Extent of Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Demetrios Doukas; Sorcha Allen; Amy Wozniak; Siri Kunchakarra; Rina Verma; Jessica Marot; John J Lopez; Koen Nieman; Gianluca Pontone; Jonathon Leipsic; Jeroen Bax; Mark G Rabbat
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  The Radiologist as a Gatekeeper in Chest Pain.

Authors:  Silvia Pradella; Giulia Zantonelli; Giulia Grazzini; Diletta Cozzi; Ginevra Danti; Manlio Acquafresca; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.