Literature DB >> 30267265

Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications.

Simone Arolfo1, Carolina Borgiotto2, Giovanna Bosio2, Massimiliano Mistrangelo2, Marco Ettore Allaix2, Mario Morino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the incidence and identify the risk factors of stoma-related complications in a consecutive series of patients treated at a single institution.
METHODS: For this retrospective analysis, the medical records of patients followed up at the stoma care centre of our institution over the last 16 years were reviewed. The primary end point was the incidence of stoma-related complications. Risk factors were tested using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Of a total of 1076 patients, 604 received a colostomy and 472 an ileostomy. In all, 1055 stoma-related complications were recorded in 797 patients. Univariate analysis identified the following risk factors for stoma-related complications: male sex (p = 0.032), emergency surgery (p = 0.010), open surgery (p < 0.001), and ileostomy creation (p = 0.004). Preoperative stoma site marking was noted to play a protective role (hazard ratio 0.739; 95% confidence interval 0.576-0.947; p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis confirmed male sex and ileostomy creation as risk factors (p = 0.030 and p = 0.013, respectively) and preoperative stoma site marking as an independent protective factor (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Stoma-related complications are quite common, especially when an ileostomy is present. Preoperative stoma site marking was noted to play a highly protective role not only in reducing the complication rate but also in improving the patients' quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Colostomy; Complications; Ileostomy; Stoma site marking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267265     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1857-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  15 in total

1.  [Multicentre observational study on peristomal skin disorders. A proposal classification].

Authors:  G Bosio; F Pisani; A Fonti; A Scrocca; C Morandell; L Anselmi; M Antonini; G Militello; G Mastronicola; S Gasperini; L Lucibello
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul

2.  Complications of intestinal stomas.

Authors:  P Nastro; C H Knowles; A McGrath; B Heyman; T R C Porrett; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Stoma complications: a literature overview.

Authors:  J Shabbir; D C Britton
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Technical Considerations in Stoma Creation.

Authors:  Alia Whitehead; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 5.  Management and complications of stomas.

Authors:  Andrea C Bafford; Jennifer L Irani
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience.

Authors:  J J Park; A Del Pino; C P Orsay; R L Nelson; R K Pearl; J R Cintron; H Abcarian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  The Difficult Stoma: Challenges and Strategies.

Authors:  Scott A Strong
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  A multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications.

Authors:  Zehra Gocmen Baykara; Sevil Guler Demir; Ayise Karadag; Deniz Harputlu; Aysel Kahraman; Sercan Karadag; Aysel Oren Hin; Eylem Togluk; Meral Altinsoy; Sonca Erdem; Rabia Cihan
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Prophylactic mesh reinforcement of stomas: a cost-effectiveness meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J M Findlay; C P J Wood; C Cunningham
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The effect of preoperative stoma site marking on risk of stoma-related complications in patients with intestinal ostomy-protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Mareike Kugler; Jessica Breuing; Tanja Rombey; Simone Hess; Peter Ambe; Erich Grohmann; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: Research Validation of Standards of Care.

Authors:  Joanna Burgess-Stocks; Jeanine Gleba; Kathleen Lawrence; Susan Mueller
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.970

4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery nursing program, a protective factor for stoma-related complications in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Weiling Shao; Honggang Wang; Qun Chen; Wen Zhao; Yulian Gu; Guoqin Feng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.