Literature DB >> 24807019

A multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications.

Zehra Gocmen Baykara1, Sevil Guler Demir2, Ayise Karadag1, Deniz Harputlu3, Aysel Kahraman4, Sercan Karadag5, Aysel Oren Hin6, Eylem Togluk7, Meral Altinsoy8, Sonca Erdem9, Rabia Cihan10.   

Abstract

Even though preoperative marking of the stoma area is considered important for the prevention of postoperative complications, not all healthcare institutions have universally adopted this practice. A multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study was conducted to determine the effect of stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications. The 1-year study included 748 patients (408 [54.5%] male, mean age 56.60 ± 16.73 years) from eight stomatherapy units in Turkey. Patient data, including age, gender, diagnosis, type of surgery, history of preoperative stoma site marking, person performing the marking, and postoperative complications, were obtained from patient records, abstracted, and analyzed. Cancer was the reason for the operation in 545 (72.9%) of the cases. In 287 patients (38.4%), the stoma and wound care nurse and/or surgeon marked the stoma area; this occurred 1 day before or on the day of surgery according to Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommendations. Stomal/ peristomal complications developed in 248 (33.2%) persons; the most frequently observed complications in patients were parastomal skin problems (136, 48.7%), mucocutaneous separation (52, 18.6%), and retraction (31, 11.1%). The rate of complications was higher among patients whose stoma site was not marked than among those whose stoma site was marked (22.9% and 46%, respectively; P <0.001). The results of this study confirm the stoma area should be marked preoperatively in all planned surgical interventions in order to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Additional prospective and experimental studies on effectiveness of preoperative stoma site marking should be conducted with larger sample groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  5 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications.

Authors:  Simone Arolfo; Carolina Borgiotto; Giovanna Bosio; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Mario Morino
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Ostomy Complications in Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Armen Aboulian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 5.  Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections of the Perineum.

Authors:  Bryan P Kline; Nimalan A Jeganathan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.