Literature DB >> 10613476

Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience.

J J Park1, A Del Pino, C P Orsay, R L Nelson, R K Pearl, J R Cintron, H Abcarian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis of enteric stomas performed at Cook County Hospital was undertaken to evaluate stoma complications per stoma type and configuration and operating service. In addition, we attempted to identify factors predictive of increased enteric stoma complications.
METHODS: From 1976 to 1995, data cards on 1,616 patients with stomas were compiled by Cook County Hospital enteric stomal therapists. Data card information included age, gender, weight, early and late stoma complications, emergency status, operating service, type and configuration of the stoma, and whether the patient was seen preoperatively by an enteric stomal therapist. Data were then analyzed using a logistic regression model to identify those variables that influenced the rate of complications.
RESULTS: There were 553 (34 percent) patients with complications. Among the total complications, 448 (28 percent) occurred early (<1 month postoperative), and 105 (6 percent) occurred late (>1 month). The most common early complications were skin irritation (12 percent), pain associated with poor stoma location (7 percent), and partial necrosis (5 percent). The most common late complications were skin irritation (6 percent), prolapse (2 percent), and stenosis (2 percent). The enteric stoma with the most complications was the loop ileostomy (75 percent). The enteric stoma with the least complications was the end transverse colostomy (6 percent). The general surgery service had the most complications (47 percent), followed by gynecology (44 percent), surgical oncology (37 percent), colorectal (32 percent), pediatric surgery (29 percent), and trauma (25 percent). Age, operating service, enteric stoma type and configuration, and preoperative enteric stomal therapist marking were found to be variables that influenced stoma complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications from enteric stoma construction are common. Preoperative enteric stoma site marking, especially in older patients, and avoiding the ileostomy, particularly in the loop configuration, can help minimize complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10613476     DOI: 10.1007/bf02236210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  59 in total

1.  Loop stomas with a subcutaneously placed bridge device.

Authors:  I Baloyiannis; G Christodoulidis; D Symeonidis; I Hatzinikolaou; M Spyridakis; K Tepetes
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Ioannis Voulimeneas; Constantine Antonopoulos; Evangelos Alifierakis; Pavlos Ioannides
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Palliative treatment for incurable malignant colorectal obstructions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Dan Zhao; Bao-Bao Cai; Ri-Sheng Cao; Rui-Hua Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The cost-effectiveness of colonic stenting as a bridge to curative surgery in patients with acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Steven Latosinsky; Brennan M R Spiegel; Laura E Targownik
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Early stomal complications.

Authors:  Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

6.  Late stomal complications.

Authors:  Syed G Husain; Thomas E Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

7.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Local repair of a trans-stomal ileocecal prolapse by stapler device.

Authors:  F Fleres; E Saladino; C Famulari; A Macrì
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-09-17

Review 9.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

10.  Managing acute colorectal obstruction by "bridge stenting" to laparoscopic surgery: Our experience.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Bonfante; Luigi D'Ambra; Stefano Berti; Emilio Falco; Massimo Vittorio Cristoni; Romolo Briglia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.