Literature DB >> 18721455

An evaluation of a Shockroom located CT scanner: a randomized study of early assessment by CT scanning in trauma patients in the bi-located trauma center North-West Netherlands (REACT trial).

Teun P Saltzherr1, P H Ping Fung Kon Jin, Fred C Bakker, Kees J Ponsen, Jan S K Luitse, Mark Scholing, Georgios F Giannakopoulos, Ludo F M Beenen, C Pieter Henny, Ger M Koole, Hans B Reitsma, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Patrick M M Bossuyt, J Carel Goslings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major source of morbidity and mortality, especially in people below the age of 50 years. For the evaluation of trauma patients CT scanning has gained wide acceptance in and provides detailed information on location and severity of injuries. However, CT scanning is frequently time consuming due to logistical (location of CT scanner elsewhere in the hospital) and technical issues. An innovative and unique infrastructural change has been made in the AMC in which the CT scanner is transported to the patient instead of the patient to the CT scanner. As a consequence, early shockroom CT scanning provides an all-inclusive multifocal diagnostic modality that can detect (potentially life-threatening) injuries in an earlier stage, so that therapy can be directed based on these findings. METHODS/
DESIGN: The REACT-trial is a prospective, randomized trial, comparing two Dutch level-1 trauma centers, respectively the VUmc and AMC, with the only difference being the location of the CT scanner (respectively in the Radiology Department and in the shockroom). All trauma patients that are transported to the AMC or VUmc shockroom according to the current prehospital triage system are included. Patients younger than 16 years of age and patients who die during transport are excluded. Randomization will be performed prehospitally. Study parameters are the number of days outside the hospital during the first year following the trauma (primary outcome), general health at 6 and 12 months post trauma, mortality and morbidity, and various time intervals during initial evaluation. In addition a cost-effectiveness analysis of this shockroom concept will be performed. Regarding primary outcome it is estimated that the common standard deviation of days spent outside of the hospital during the first year following trauma is a total of 12 days. To detect an overall difference of 2 days within the first year between the two strategies, 562 patients per group are needed. (alpha 0.95 and beta 0.80). DISCUSSION: The REACT-trial will provide evidence on the effects of a strategy involving early shockroom CT scanning compared with a standard diagnostic imaging strategy in trauma patients on both patient outcome and operations research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN55332315.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721455      PMCID: PMC2532999          DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-8-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Emerg Med        ISSN: 1471-227X


  7 in total

1.  Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography for the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma patients.

Authors:  Jen-Feng Fang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Being-Chuan Lin; Yu-Pao Hsu; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with "normal" chest radiograph?

Authors:  A K Exadaktylos; G Sclabas; S W Schmid; B Schaller; H Zimmermann
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Frederick Holmes; Radha Akkinepalli
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-05

4.  Efficacy of thoracic computerized tomography in blunt chest trauma.

Authors:  L Omert; W W Yeaney; J Protetch
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  [Shock room diagnosis in polytrauma. Value of thoracic CT].

Authors:  A Trupka; R Kierse; C Waydhas; D Nast-Kolb; U Blahs; L Schweiberer; K J Pfeifer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Current Role of Emergency US in Patients with Major Trauma.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Michael M Krötz; Christoph Degenhart; Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian F Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Routine helical computed tomographic evaluation of the mediastinum in high-risk blunt trauma patients.

Authors:  D Demetriades; H Gomez; G C Velmahos; J A Asensio; J Murray; E E Cornwell; K Alo; T V Berne
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-10
  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Leon Guchlerner; Julian Lukas Wichmann; Patricia Tischendorf; Moritz Albrecht; Thomas Josef Vogl; Sebastian Wutzler; Hanns Ackermann; Katrin Eichler; Claudia Frellesen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs.

Authors:  Cornelis H van der Vlies; Dominique C Olthof; Menno Gaakeer; Kees J Ponsen; Otto M van Delden; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  Trauma management incorporating focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) - potential effect on survival.

Authors:  Karl-Georg Kanz; April O Paul; Rolf Lefering; Mike V Kay; Uwe Kreimeier; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Huber-Wagner
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-10

4.  Radiological work-up after mass casualty incidents: are ATLS guidelines applicable?

Authors:  Ingri L E Postma; L F M Beenen; T S Bijlsma; F H Berger; M J Heetveld; F W Bloemers; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Value of repeat CT for nonoperative management of patients with blunt liver and spleen injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khadidja Malloum Boukar; Lynne Moore; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Kahina Soltana; Natalie Yanchar; John Kortbeek; Howard Champion; Julien Clement
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Literature review of the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and transcatheter arterial embolization for the treatment of traumatic splenic injuries.

Authors:  Cornelis H van der Vlies; Otto M van Delden; Bastiaan J Punt; Kees J Ponsen; Jim A Reekers; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: fast or accuracy?-Author's Reply.

Authors:  Stefania Ianniello; Margherita Trinci; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-09-03

Review 8.  Evidence-Based Management and Controversies in Blunt Splenic Trauma.

Authors:  D C Olthof; C H van der Vlies; J C Goslings
Journal:  Curr Trauma Rep       Date:  2017-02-09

9.  Early CT scanning in the emergency department in patients with penetrating injuries: does it affect outcome?

Authors:  W J van den Hout; G M van der Wilden; F Boot; F J Idenburg; S J Rhemrev; R Hoencamp
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.693

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.