Literature DB >> 30266729

Metagenomic Insights into the Degradation of Resistant Starch by Human Gut Microbiota.

Marius Vital1,2, Adina Howe3, Nathalie Bergeron4, Ronald M Krauss4, Janet K Jansson5, James M Tiedje6.   

Abstract

Several studies monitoring alterations in the community structure upon resistant starch (RS) interventions are available, although comprehensive function-based analyses are lacking. Recently, a multiomics approach based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metaproteomics, and metabolomics on fecal samples from individuals subjected to high and low doses of type 2 RS (RS2; 48 g and 3 g/2,500 kcal, respectively, daily for 2 weeks) in a crossover intervention experiment was performed. In the present study, we did pathway-based metagenomic analyses on samples from a subset of individuals (n = 12) from that study to obtain additional detailed insights into the functional structure at high resolution during RS2 intervention. A mechanistic framework based on obtained results is proposed where primary degradation was governed by Firmicutes, with Ruminococcus bromii as a major taxon involved, providing fermentation substrates and increased acetate concentrations for the growth of various major butyrate producers exhibiting the enzyme butyryl-coenzyme A (CoA):acetate CoA-transferase. H2-scavenging sulfite reducers and acetogens concurrently increased. Individual responses of gut microbiota were noted, where seven of the 12 participants displayed all features of the outlined pattern, whereas four individuals showed mixed behavior and one subject was unresponsive. Intervention order did not affect the outcome, emphasizing a constant substrate supply for maintaining specific functional communities.IMPORTANCE Manipulation of gut microbiota is increasingly recognized as a promising approach to reduce various noncommunicable diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. Specific dietary supplements, including resistant starches (RS), are often a focus, yet comprehensive insights into functional responses of microbiota are largely lacking. Furthermore, unresponsiveness in certain individuals is poorly understood. Our data indicate that distinct parts of microbiota work jointly to degrade RS and successively form health-promoting fermentation end products. It highlights the need to consider both primary degraders and specific more-downstream-acting bacterial groups in order to achieve desired intervention outcomes. The gained insights will assist the design of personalized treatment strategies based on an individual's microbiota.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  butyrate; diet; gut microbiota; metagenomics; resistant starch; short-chain fatty acids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30266729      PMCID: PMC6238065          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01562-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  41 in total

Review 1.  Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota.

Authors:  Petra Louis; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota.

Authors:  Alan W Walker; Jennifer Ince; Sylvia H Duncan; Lucy M Webster; Grietje Holtrop; Xiaolei Ze; David Brown; Mark D Stares; Paul Scott; Aurore Bergerat; Petra Louis; Freda McIntosh; Alexandra M Johnstone; Gerald E Lobley; Julian Parkhill; Harry J Flint
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon.

Authors:  Xiaolei Ze; Sylvia H Duncan; Petra Louis; Harry J Flint
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 4.  Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics.

Authors:  G R Gibson; M B Roberfroid
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Association between fecal hydrogen sulfide production and pouchitis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohge; Julie K Furne; John Springfield; David A Rothenberger; Robert D Madoff; Michael D Levitt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Phylotypes related to Ruminococcus bromii are abundant in the large bowel of humans and increase in response to a diet high in resistant starch.

Authors:  Guy C J Abell; Caroline M Cooke; Corinna N Bennett; Michael A Conlon; Alexandra L McOrist
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.194

7.  Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Levi Waldron; Annalisa Ballarini; Vagheesh Narasimhan; Olivier Jousson; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch.

Authors:  A Venkataraman; J R Sieber; A W Schmidt; C Waldron; K R Theis; T M Schmidt
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Effects of Arabinoxylan and Resistant Starch on Intestinal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomised Crossover Study.

Authors:  Stine Hald; Anne Grethe Schioldan; Mary E Moore; Anders Dige; Helle Nygaard Lærke; Jørgen Agnholt; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen; Kjeld Hermansen; Maria L Marco; Søren Gregersen; Jens F Dahlerup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Conserved and variable responses of the gut microbiome to resistant starch type 2.

Authors:  Zachary A Bendiks; Knud E B Knudsen; Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Intake of Natural, Unprocessed Tiger Nuts (Cyperus esculentus L.) Drink Significantly Favors Intestinal Beneficial Bacteria in a Short Period of Time.

Authors:  Marta Selma-Royo; Izaskun García-Mantrana; M Carmen Collado; Gaspar Perez-Martínez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Dietary resistant starch ameliorating lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in meat ducks associated with the alteration in gut microbiome and glucagon-like peptide 1 signaling.

Authors:  Simeng Qin; Weiqiang Bai; Todd J Applegate; Keying Zhang; Gang Tian; Xuemei Ding; Shiping Bai; Jianping Wang; Li Lv; Huanwei Peng; Yue Xuan; Quifeng Zeng
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  How Diet and Physical Activity Modulate Gut Microbiota: Evidence, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Daniela Campaniello; Maria Rosaria Corbo; Milena Sinigaglia; Barbara Speranza; Angela Racioppo; Clelia Altieri; Antonio Bevilacqua
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Dietary Resistant Potato Starch Alters Intestinal Microbial Communities and Their Metabolites, and Markers of Immune Regulation and Barrier Function in Swine.

Authors:  Julian Trachsel; Cassidy Briggs; Nicholas K Gabler; Heather K Allen; Crystal L Loving
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  The effects of resistant starches on inflammatory bowel disease in preclinical and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Montroy; Rania Berjawi; Manoj M Lalu; Eyal Podolsky; Cayden Peixoto; Levent Sahin; Alain Stintzi; David Mack; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Intestinal Inflammation as a Dysbiosis of Energy Procurement: New Insights into an Old Topic.

Authors:  J Scott Lee; Ruth X Wang; Erica E Alexeev; Sean P Colgan
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

8.  Maternal fecal microbiome predicts gestational age, birth weight and neonatal growth in rural Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Ethan K Gough; Thaddeus J Edens; Hyun Min Geum; Iman Baharmand; Sandeep K Gill; Ruairi C Robertson; Kuda Mutasa; Robert Ntozini; Laura E Smith; Bernard Chasekwa; Florence D Majo; Naume V Tavengwa; Batsirai Mutasa; Freddy Francis; Lynnea Carr; Joice Tome; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; Lawrence H Moulton; Andrew J Prendergast; Jean H Humphrey; Amee R Manges; Shine Trial Team
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Plant-Based Diet Index and Metabolic Risk in Men: Exploring the Role of the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Dong D Wang; Ambika Satija; Kerry L Ivey; Jun Li; Jeremy E Wilkinson; Ruifeng Li; Megu Baden; Andrew T Chan; Curtis Huttenhower; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; Qi Sun
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 4.687

Review 10.  Resistant starch, microbiome, and precision modulation.

Authors:  Peter A Dobranowski; Alain Stintzi
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.