Literature DB >> 32251948

Conserved and variable responses of the gut microbiome to resistant starch type 2.

Zachary A Bendiks1, Knud E B Knudsen2, Michael J Keenan3, Maria L Marco4.   

Abstract

Resistant starch type 2 (RS2), a dietary fiber comprised solely of glucose, has been extensively studied in clinical trials and animal models for its capacity to improve metabolic and systemic health. Because the health modulatory effects of RS2 and other dietary fibers are thought to occur through modification of the gut microbiome, those studies frequently include assessments of RS2-mediated changes to intestinal microbial composition and function. In this review, we identify the conserved responses of the gut microbiome among 13 human and 35 animal RS2 intervention studies. Consistent outcomes of RS2 interventions include reductions in bacterial α-diversity; increased production of lumenal short-chain fatty acids; and enrichment of Ruminococcus bromii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and other gut taxa. Different taxa are usually responsive in animal models, and many RS2-mediated changes to the gut microbiome vary within and between studies. The root causes for this variation are examined with regard to methodological and analytical differences, host genetics and age, species differences (eg, human, animal), health status, intervention dose and duration, and baseline microbial composition. The significant variation found for this single dietary compound highlights the challenges in targeting the gut microbiome to improve health with dietary interventions. This knowledge on RS2 also provides opportunities to improve the design of nutrition studies targeting the gut microbiome and to ultimately identify the precise mechanisms via which dietary fiber benefits human health.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amylose; Fatty acids, volatile; Gastrointestinal microbiome; Microbiota; RNA, ribosomal, 16S; Starch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32251948      PMCID: PMC7295659          DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  145 in total

1.  Functional metagenomics to mine the human gut microbiome for dietary fiber catabolic enzymes.

Authors:  Lena Tasse; Juliette Bercovici; Sandra Pizzut-Serin; Patrick Robe; Julien Tap; Christophe Klopp; Brandi L Cantarel; Pedro M Coutinho; Bernard Henrissat; Marion Leclerc; Joël Doré; Pierre Monsan; Magali Remaud-Simeon; Gabrielle Potocki-Veronese
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Effects of dietary fat on gut microbiota and faecal metabolites, and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors: a 6-month randomised controlled-feeding trial.

Authors:  Yi Wan; Fenglei Wang; Jihong Yuan; Jie Li; Dandan Jiang; Jingjing Zhang; Hao Li; Ruoyi Wang; Jun Tang; Tao Huang; Jusheng Zheng; Andrew J Sinclair; Jim Mann; Duo Li
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Diet alters probiotic Lactobacillus persistence and function in the intestine.

Authors:  Sybille Tachon; Bokyung Lee; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies.

Authors:  R Crittenden; A Laitila; P Forssell; J Mättö; M Saarela; T Mattila-Sandholm; P Myllärinen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Characterization of fecal fat composition and gut derived fecal microbiota in high-fat diet fed rats following intervention with chito-oligosaccharide and resistant starch complexes.

Authors:  Wenting Shang; Xu Si; Zhongkai Zhou; Ying Li; Padraig Strappe; Chris Blanchard
Journal:  Food Funct       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Resistant starch from high amylose maize (HAM-RS2) reduces body fat and increases gut bacteria in ovariectomized (OVX) rats.

Authors:  Michael J Keenan; Marlene Janes; Julina Robert; Roy J Martin; Anne M Raggio; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Christine Pelkman; Richard Tulley; M'Famara Goita; Holiday A Durham; June Zhou; Reshani N Senevirathne
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice.

Authors:  Vanessa K Ridaura; Jeremiah J Faith; Federico E Rey; Jiye Cheng; Alexis E Duncan; Andrew L Kau; Nicholas W Griffin; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Olga Ilkayeva; Clay F Semenkovich; Katsuhiko Funai; David K Hayashi; Barbara J Lyle; Margaret C Martini; Luke K Ursell; Jose C Clemente; William Van Treuren; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Christopher B Newgard; Andrew C Heath; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Variable responses of human microbiomes to dietary supplementation with resistant starch.

Authors:  A Venkataraman; J R Sieber; A W Schmidt; C Waldron; K R Theis; T M Schmidt
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 9.  Importance of gut microbiota in obesity.

Authors:  Isabel Cornejo-Pareja; Araceli Muñoz-Garach; Mercedes Clemente-Postigo; Francisco J Tinahones
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  High amylose resistant starch diet ameliorates oxidative stress, inflammation, and progression of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nosratola D Vaziri; Shu-Man Liu; Wei Ling Lau; Mahyar Khazaeli; Sohrab Nazertehrani; Seyed H Farzaneh; Dorothy A Kieffer; Sean H Adams; Roy J Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Microbiome-based interventions to modulate gut ecology and the immune system.

Authors:  Thomas C A Hitch; Lindsay J Hall; Sarah Kate Walsh; Gabriel E Leventhal; Emma Slack; Tomas de Wouters; Jens Walter; Thomas Clavel
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Dietary fiber, starch, and sugars in bananas at different stages of ripeness in the retail market.

Authors:  Katherine M Phillips; Ryan C McGinty; Garret Couture; Pamela R Pehrsson; Kyle McKillop; Naomi K Fukagawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Gut Microbiota and Dysbiosis in Alzheimer's Disease: Implications for Pathogenesis and Treatment.

Authors:  Shan Liu; Jiguo Gao; Mingqin Zhu; Kangding Liu; Hong-Liang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Resistant Starch Type 2 from Wheat Reduces Postprandial Glycemic Response with Concurrent Alterations in Gut Microbiota Composition.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; William H Horn; Peter Finnegan; John W Newman; Maria L Marco; Nancy L Keim; Mary E Kable
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Resistant Potato Starch Alters the Cecal Microbiome and Gene Expression in Mice Fed a Western Diet Based on NHANES Data.

Authors:  Allen D Smith; Celine Chen; Lumei Cheung; Robert Ward; Korry J Hintze; Harry D Dawson
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  Defining how microorganisms benefit human health.

Authors:  Maria L Marco
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 5.813

7.  Does a high dietary intake of resistant starch affect glycaemic control and alter the gut microbiome in women with gestational diabetes? A randomised control trial protocol.

Authors:  Cathy Latino; Emily J Gianatti; Shailender Mehta; Johnny Lo; Amanda Devine; Claus Christophersen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  A narrative review of the role of gastrointestinal dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Jim Parker; Claire O'Brien; Jason Hawrelak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-12-28

9.  Additional Resistant Starch from One Potato Side Dish per Day Alters the Gut Microbiota but Not Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acid Concentrations.

Authors:  Peter DeMartino; Emily A Johnston; Kristina S Petersen; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Darrell W Cockburn
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Gut Microbiota Composition and Predicted Microbial Metabolic Pathways of Obesity Prone and Obesity Resistant Outbred Sprague-Dawley CD Rats May Account for Differences in Their Phenotype.

Authors:  Diana N Obanda; Michael J Keenan; Ryan Page; Anne M Raggio; Christopher M Taylor; Brian D Marx; Rhett W Stout; Justin Guice; Meng Luo; David A Welsh; Diana Coulon; Claudia Husseneder
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.