Literature DB >> 32830908

Preclinical assessment of clinically streamlined, 3D-printed, biocompatible single- and two-stage tissue scaffolds for ear reconstruction.

Julia R Brennan1, Ashley Cornett2,3, Brian Chang4, Sarah J Crotts5, Zahra Nourmohammadi1, Isabelle Lombaert2,3, Scott J Hollister5, David A Zopf1,6.   

Abstract

Auricular reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure requiring significant surgical expertise, as the current gold standard involves hand carving of the costal cartilage into an auricular framework and re-implantation of the tissue. 3D-printing presents a powerful tool that can reduce technical demands associated with the procedure. Our group compared clinical, radiological, histological, and biomechanical outcomes in single- and two-stage 3D-printed auricular tissue scaffolds in an athymic rodent model. Briefly, an external anatomic envelope of a human auricle was created using DICOM computed tomography (CT) images and modified in design to create a two-stage, lock-in-key base and elevating platform. Single- and two-stage scaffolds were 3D-printed by laser sintering poly-L-caprolactone (PCL) then implanted subcutaneously in five athymic rats each. Rats were monitored for ulcer formation, site infection, and scaffold distortion weekly, and scaffolds were explanted at 8 weeks with analysis using microCT and histologic staining. Nonlinear finite element analysis was performed to determine areas of high strain in relation to ulcer formation. Scaffolds demonstrated precise anatomic appearance and maintenance of integrity of both anterior and posterior auricular surfaces and scaffold projection, with no statistically significant differences in complications noted between the single- and two-staged implantation. While minor superficial ulcers occurred most commonly at the lateral and superior helix coincident with finite element predictions of high skin strains, evidence of robust tissue ingrowth and angiogenesis was visible grossly and histologically. This promising preclinical small animal model supports future initiatives for making clinically viable options for an ear tissue scaffold.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; auricular reconstruction; bioscaffolds; nonlinear finite element analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32830908      PMCID: PMC8130560          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  22 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Experimental investigation into the deep penetration of soft solids by sharp and blunt punches, with application to the piercing of skin.

Authors:  Oliver A Shergold; Norman A Fleck
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Three-Dimensional Cell Printing of Large-Volume Tissues: Application to Ear Regeneration.

Authors:  Jung-Seob Lee; Byoung Soo Kim; Donghwan Seo; Jeong Hun Park; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of human and porcine auricular cartilage.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Hassan B Nasser; Anna G Mitsak; Farhan S Huq; Vishnu Rajendran; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  The tissue-engineered auricle: past, present, and future.

Authors:  David A Bichara; Niamh-Anna O'Sullivan; Irina Pomerantseva; Xing Zhao; Cathryn A Sundback; Joseph P Vacanti; Mark A Randolph
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Aesthetic auricular reconstruction with autologous rib cartilage grafts in adult microtia patients.

Authors:  So-Eun Han; So-Young Lim; Jai-Kyung Pyon; Sa-ik Bang; Goo-Hyun Mun; Kap Sung Oh
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia.

Authors:  S Nagata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Social and psychological effects of major craniofacial deformity.

Authors:  T Pruzinsky
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-11

9.  Tissue engineering of a human sized and shaped auricle using a mold.

Authors:  S H Kamil; M P Vacanti; B S Aminuddin; M J Jackson; C A Vacanti; R D Eavey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study.

Authors:  H G Thomson; T Y Kim; S H Ein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.