| Literature DB >> 30261739 |
Godwin O Ihegboro1,2, Chimaobi J Ononamadu1,2, E Afor3, Gladys D Odogiyan1.
Abstract
Medicinal plants over time have proven to have potential to manage a huge number of diseases and disorders and thus have become a great source of pharmaceutical drugs. One of such plants is Tapinanthus bangwensis (African mistletoe). It is a semiparasitic and epiphytic plant growing on citrus tree, obtaining its food photosynthetically while its nutrient and water is got from the host plant. The aim of this study was to determine the cytotoxicological and hepatocurative effect of aqueous fraction of T bangwensis in acetaminophen (paracetamol)-induced Wistar rats. The antioxidant potential of the plant was determined by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazine scavenging and ferric reducing power assays. The cytotoxic effect was determined using Allium cepa test while the liver biochemical indices were determined by standard protocols. Data obtained were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance at 95% confidence level and reported as mean ± standard deviation. The concentrated aqueous fraction of T bangwensis was found to be 23.3 g (58.25%). Quantitative determination of some vital phytochemicals revealed the following: flavonoid (84.6 ± 0.41 mg/100 g), phenol (147.5 ± 1.07 mg/100 g), tannin (31 ± 0.85 mg/ 100 g), alkaloid (23.45 ± 0.09 mg/100 g), and saponin (0.146 ± 0.0 mg/100 g). Treatment of rats with the aqueous extract of T bangwensis significantly decreased paracetamol-induced elevation of activities of liver function indices, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, triglyceride, total cholesterol level and increased the albumin, total protein, and high-density lipoprotein levels. The plant extract also attenuated the paracetamol elevated lipid peroxidation product, malondialdehyde. The research findings suggest that aqueous extract of T bangwensis is slightly cytotoxic, possesses appreciable antioxidant property and exhibited hepatocurative effect against paracetamol-induced hepatoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant property; cytotoxic and lipid peroxidation; hepatocurative effect; paracetamol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30261739 PMCID: PMC6166302 DOI: 10.1177/2515690X18801577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evid Based Integr Med ISSN: 2515-690X
The Yield of Aqueous Extract of Tapinanthus bangwensis Leaves.
| Plant Sample | Quantification |
|---|---|
| Weight of | 2200 g |
| Weight of methanolic extract | 60.5 g |
| Percentage yield of methanolic extract | 2.73 |
| Weight of methanolic extract used | 40.0 g |
| Weight of aqueous extract yielded | 23.3 g |
| Percentage yield of aqueous extract | 58.25 |
Quantification of Phytochemical Compounds Present in Aqueous Extract of Tapinanthus bangwensis.a
| Phytochemical Compounds | Concentration (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|
| Saponin | 0.146 ± 0.01 |
| Tannin | 31 ± 0.85 |
| Alkaloid | 23.45 ± 0.09 |
| Flavonoid | 84.6 ± 0.41 |
| Phenol | 147.5 ± 1.07 |
a Values were measured in triplicates and are statistically represented as mean ± standard deviation.
In Vitro Antioxidant Property of Tapinanthus bangwensis Using Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP).a
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Control (Ascorbic Acid) (% Inhibition) | Aqueous |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 24.7 ± 0.41 | 20.80 ± 0.47 |
| 100 | 34.75 ± 0.52 | 21.98 ± 0.54 |
| 150 | 38.97 ± 0.28 | 22.85 ± 0.78 |
| 200 | 45.41 ± 0.52 | 22.7 ± 0.08 |
| 250 | 50.61 ± 0.07 | 25.09 ± 0.59 |
a Values were measured in triplicates and are statistically represented as mean ± standard deviation.
In Vitro Antioxidant Property of Aqueous Extract of Tapinanthus bangwensis Using 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazine (DPPH).a
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Control (Ascorbic Acid) (% Inhibition) | Aqueous |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 56.02 ± 0.21 | 62.43 ± 6.35 |
| 100 | 56.02 ± 0.055 | 66.77 ± 0.53 |
| 150 | 86.57 ± 0.08 | 67.52 ± 0.42 |
| 200 | 86.52 ± 0.03 | 69.24 ± 0.41 |
| 250 | 86.6 ± 0.11 | 73.46 ± 0.63 |
a Values were measured in triplicates and are statistically represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Effect of Tapinanthus bangwensis Extract on Meristematic Root Growth Length Using Allium cepa.
| Concentration (mg/100 mL) | Control | Aqueous |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 3.08 ± 1.10 | 1.93 ± 0.62 |
| 40 | 3.08 ± 1.10 | 1.93 ± 0.70 |
| 60 | 3.08 ± 1.10 | 2.05 ± 0.61 |
| 80 | 3.08 ± 1.10 | 2.25 ± 0.69 |
| 100 | 3.08 ± 1.10 | 1.7 ± 0.53 |
Cytotoxic Effect of Aqueous Extract of Tapinanthus bangwensis on the Chromosome Structure Using Allium cepa Test.
| Concentrations | Control | 20 mg/100 cm3 | 40 mg/100 cm3 | 60 mg/100 cm3 | 80 mg/100 cm3 | 100 mg/100 cm3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cells | 500 | 464 | 460 | 456 | 452 | 448 |
| Prophase | 7 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Metaphase | 18 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 10 |
| Anaphase | 11 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Telophase | 13 | 14 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 10 |
| Total no. of cells | 49 | 45 | 41 | 37 | 33 | 29 |
| % Mitotic index | 9.80 | 9.69 | 8.91 | 8.11 | 7.30 | 6.47 |
| Attached bridge | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Bridge chromosome | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Binuclei | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C-mitosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Laggard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Multipolar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stickiness | 0 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Translaggard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vagrant | 0 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Total aberrations | 0 | 21 | 21 | 18 | 15 | 13 |
| % Aberrant cells | 0 | 4.53 | 4.57 | 3.95 | 3.32 | 2.90 |
Figure 1.Photomicrographs of normal chromosomal structures.
Figure 2.Photomicrographs of the different chromosomal aberrations at different concentration of aqueous fraction of Tapinanthus bangwensis.
Effect of Aqueous Tapinanthus bangwensis on Some Liver Functions.*
| Parameters | Control | PCM Only | PCM + 200 mg/kg | PCM + 400 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (IU/L) | 45.0 ± 7.00a | 52.06 ± 16.00bd | 45.0 ± 7.00ad | 55.7 ± 10.5bc |
| AST (IU/L) | 98.33 ± 8.50a | 139.33 ± 11.01bd | 123.3 ± 16.50ad | 124.3 ± 5.13ad |
| ALP (IU/L) | 1194 ± 89.11a | 1287.56 ± 15.60bc | 801.16 ± 584.3bd | 1188.9 ± 42.81ad |
| ALB (g/dL) | 3.86 ± 0.37a | 3.75 ± 0.01ac | 3.63 ± 0.20ac | 3.80 ± 0.44ac |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 4.54 ± 0.55a | 4.06 ± 1.04ac | 4.31 ± 0.26ac | 4.26 ± 0.03ac |
| CHOL (mg/dL) | 61.69 ± 29.91a | 35.21 ± 4.68bc | 70.41 ± 1.25ad | 43.30 ± 0.31bc |
| TRIG (mg/dL) | 66.82 ± 6.58a | 117.65 ± 22.59ac | 95.06 ± 1.88ac | 111.06 ± 28.24ac |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 42.25 ± 4.01a | 43.49 ± 10.56ac | 24.24 ± 0.67bd | 50.98 ± 4.01ac |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 1.40 ± 0.78a | 2.26 ± 0.55ac | 1.57 ± 1.17bc | 2.88 ± 2.61bc |
Abbreviations: ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CHOL, cholesterol; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MDA, malondialdehyde; PCM, paracetamol; TRIG, triglycerides.
* Values were measured in triplicates and are represented statistically as mean ± standard deviation at P < 0.05.
a No significant difference between control and other groups.
b Significant difference between control and other groups.
c No significant difference between induced group and treated groups.
d Significant difference between induced group and treated groups.