Literature DB >> 30259220

Masquelet Technique: Effects of Spacer Material and Micro-topography on Factor Expression and Bone Regeneration.

Zacharie Toth1, Matt Roi1, Emily Evans1, J Tracy Watson1, Daemeon Nicolaou1, Sarah McBride-Gagyi2.   

Abstract

We and others have shown that changing surface characteristics of the spacer implanted during the first Masquelet stage alters some aspects of membrane development. Previously we demonstrated that titanium (TI) spacers create membranes that are better barriers to movement of solutes > 70 kDa in size than polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) induced-membranes, and roughening creates more mechanically compliant membranes. However, it is unclear if these alterations affect the membrane's biochemical environment or bone regeneration during the second stage. Ten-week-old, male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent an initial surgery to create an externally stabilized 6 mm femoral defect. PMMA or TI spacers with smooth (~ 1 μm) or roughened (~ 8 μm) surfaces were implanted. Four weeks later, rats were either euthanized for membrane harvest or underwent the second Masquelet surgery. TI spacers induced thicker membranes that were similar in structure and biochemical expression. All membranes were bilayered with the inner layer having increased factor expression [bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), interleukin 6 (IL6), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)]. Roughening increased overall IL6 levels. Ten-weeks post-engraftment, PMMA-smooth induced membranes better supported bone regeneration (60% union). The other groups only had 1 or 2 that united (9-22%). There were no significant differences in any micro computed tomography or dynamic histology outcome. In conclusion, this study suggests that the membrane's important function in the Masquelet technique is not simply as a barrier. There is likely a critical biochemical, cellular, or vascular component as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Bone grafting; Bone reconstruction; Critical-sized defects; MicroCT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259220      PMCID: PMC6318020          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-02137-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  9 in total

1.  Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.

Authors:  Florelle Gindraux; François Loisel; Michael Bourgeois; Karim Oudina; Martine Melin; Benoit de Billy; Pauline Sergent; Gregoire Leclerc; Hervé Petite; Frederic Auber; Laurent Obert; Isabelle Pluvy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Vassilis P Giannoudis; Stephan Sehmisch; Animesh Jha; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The Masquelet Technique: Can Disposable Polypropylene Syringes be an Alternative to Standard PMMA Spacers? A Rat Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Laurent Mathieu; James Charles Murison; Arnaud de Rousiers; Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Didier Lutomski; Jean-Marc Collombet; Marjorie Durand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of global gene expression in regenerate tissues during Masquelet treatment.

Authors:  Nishant Gohel; Rafael Senos; Steven A Goldstein; Kurt D Hankenson; Mark E Hake; Andrea I Alford
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hening Sun; Charles Godbout; Kalter Hali; Jovana Momic; Emil H Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 6.  Masquelet technique in military practice: specificities and future directions for combat-related bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  Laurent Mathieu; Romain Mourtialon; Marjorie Durand; Arnaud de Rousiers; Nicolas de l'Escalopier; Jean-Marc Collombet
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2022-09-02

Review 7.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Probing the role of methyl methacrylate release from spacer materials in induced membrane bone healing.

Authors:  Alexander Stahl; Young Bum Park; Sang-Hyun Park; Sien Lin; Chi-Chun Pan; Sungwoo Kim; Yunzhi P Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Effects of topical mechanical stability on the formation of Masquelet membrane in a rabbit radial defect model.

Authors:  Jie Xie; Donghao Liu; Haoyi Wang; Haitao Long; Yong Zhu; Yihe Hu; Min Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.