Brett J Green1. 1. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. dox6@cdc.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evolution of molecular-based methods over the last two decades has provided new approaches to identify and characterize fungal communities or "mycobiomes" at resolutions previously not possible using traditional hazard identification methods. The recent focus on fungal community assemblages within indoor environments has provided renewed insight into overlooked sources of fungal exposure. In occupational studies, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing has recently been utilized in a variety of environments ranging from indoor office buildings to agricultural commodity and harvesting operations. RECENT FINDINGS: Fungal communities identified in occupational environments have been primarily placed in the phylum Ascomycota and included classes typically identified using traditional fungal exposure methods such as the Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, and Saccharomycetes. The phylum Basidiomycota has also been reported to be more prevalent than previously estimated and ITS region sequences have been primarily derived from the classes Agaricomycetes and Ustilaginomycetes. These studies have also resolved sequences placed in the Basidiomycota classes Tremellomycetes and Exobasidiomycetes that include environmental and endogenous yeast species. These collective datasets have shown that occupational fungal exposures include a much broader diversity of fungi than once thought. Although the clinical implications for occupational allergy are an emerging field of research, establishing the mycobiome in occupational environments will be critical for future studies to determine the complete spectrum of worker exposures to fungal bioaerosols and their impact on worker health.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evolution of molecular-based methods over the last two decades has provided new approaches to identify and characterize fungal communities or "mycobiomes" at resolutions previously not possible using traditional hazard identification methods. The recent focus on fungal community assemblages within indoor environments has provided renewed insight into overlooked sources of fungal exposure. In occupational studies, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing has recently been utilized in a variety of environments ranging from indoor office buildings to agricultural commodity and harvesting operations. RECENT FINDINGS: Fungal communities identified in occupational environments have been primarily placed in the phylum Ascomycota and included classes typically identified using traditional fungal exposure methods such as the Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, and Saccharomycetes. The phylum Basidiomycota has also been reported to be more prevalent than previously estimated and ITS region sequences have been primarily derived from the classes Agaricomycetes and Ustilaginomycetes. These studies have also resolved sequences placed in the Basidiomycota classes Tremellomycetes and Exobasidiomycetes that include environmental and endogenous yeast species. These collective datasets have shown that occupational fungal exposures include a much broader diversity of fungi than once thought. Although the clinical implications for occupational allergy are an emerging field of research, establishing the mycobiome in occupational environments will be critical for future studies to determine the complete spectrum of worker exposures to fungal bioaerosols and their impact on worker health.
Authors: Katarina Ihrmark; Inga T M Bödeker; Karelyn Cruz-Martinez; Hanna Friberg; Ariana Kubartova; Jessica Schenck; Ylva Strid; Jan Stenlid; Mikael Brandström-Durling; Karina E Clemmensen; Björn D Lindahl Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky; Daniel A Pickersgill; Viviane R Després; Ulrich Pöschl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen Vesper; Charles Barnes; Christina E Ciaccio; Alan Johanns; Kevin Kennedy; Johnna S Murphy; Arcela Nunez-Alvarez; Megan T Sandel; David Cox; Gary Dewalt; Peter J Ashley Journal: J Asthma Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Björn D Lindahl; R Henrik Nilsson; Leho Tedersoo; Kessy Abarenkov; Tor Carlsen; Rasmus Kjøller; Urmas Kõljalg; Taina Pennanen; Søren Rosendahl; Jan Stenlid; Håvard Kauserud Journal: New Phytol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: James R Couch; George R Grimes; Douglas M Wiegand; Brett J Green; Eric K Glassford; Leonard M Zwack; Angela R Lemons; Stephen R Jackson; Donald H Beezhold Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.079