| Literature DB >> 30258621 |
Ruvini Liyanage1, Oshini Perera1,2, Gusthingna W A S Lakmini3, Pabodha Weththasinghe4, Rizliya Visvanathan1, Chathuni Jayathilake1, Barana C Jayawardana4, Janak Vidanarachchi4, Ramiah Sivakanesan5.
Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effect of processed (boiled and sprouted) cowpea-incorporated experimental diets on serum cholesterol and serum antioxidant capacity in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed Wistar rats. Seven weeks old male Wistar rats were fed 20% fat as a control (CD), for comparison with 20% fat-enriched diets containing 20% whole raw cowpea diets (Bombay Raw Diet; BRD and MI35 Raw Diet; MRD), boiled cowpea diets (Bombay Boiled Diet; BBD and MI35 Boiled Diet; MBD) and sprouted cowpea diet (Bombay Sprouted Diet; BSD) for 6 weeks. The increase in serum total cholesterol as a result of high-fat diet was significantly countered by boiled and raw cowpea-incorporated diet-fed rats. Increased serum non-HDL-C level caused by HFD was significantly (p < 0.05) countered by raw, boiled, and sprouted cowpeas, while HDL-C was increased by raw MI and boiled Bombay incorporated diets. Boiling has improved the hypocholesterolemic ability of Bombay cowpea and BBD has significantly (p < 0.05) modulated serum HDL-C level and liver weight in rats. These findings were supported significantly high soluble fiber content in processed cowpea powder than that in raw cowpea powder. The decrease in serum antioxidant activity as a result of HFD was significantly countered by BRD. Processing has reduced the antioxidant activity in cowpeas and serum antioxidant activity in rats. Cecal lactobacilli population was significantly high in all cowpea diet-fed groups compared to control. Modulated serum cholesterol level in cowpea diet-fed rats was accompanied by dietary fiber composition, antioxidant activity in cowpeas and fecal weight, cecal weight and cecal lactobacilli population in rats compared to control. Both processed and raw cowpea-incorporated diets have modulated HFD-induced hypercholesterolemia by modulating serum antioxidative capacity, cholesterol metabolism, and cecal fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: Wistar rats; cowpea; hypocholesterolemia; serum antioxidants; serum lipids
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258621 PMCID: PMC6145219 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Crude fat, crude fiber, crude protein, ash, carbohydrate (CHO), and dry matter content (dry g/100 g) of cowpea powder
| Cultivar | Crude fat | Crude protein | Crude fiber | Ash | CHO | Dry matter | Dietary fiber | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insoluble | Soluble | Total | |||||||
| Bombay raw | 3.45 ± 0.06 | 23.45 ± 0.62 | 6.85 ± 0.07 | 3.55 ± 0.04 | 58.89 ± 0.44 | 96.19 ± 0.06 | 19.12 ± 0.22b | 0.09 ± 0.01c | 19.18 ± 0.18b |
| Bombay boiled | 3.08 ± 0.12 | 25.40 ± 0.34 | 6.38 ± 0.03 | 4.80 ± 0.04 | 56.50 ± 0.66 | 96.34 ± 0.03 | 10.93 ± 0.01c | 0.33 ± 0.02b | 11.26 ± 0.09c |
| Bombay sprouted | 3.44 ± 0.13 | 24.06 ± 0.16 | 6.24 ± 0.12 | 3.21 ± 0.18 | 59.29 ± 0.36 | 95.91 ± 0.21 | 10.24 ± 0.13c | 0.32 ± 0.03b | 10.56 ± 0.13c |
| MI 35 raw | 3.24 ± 0.05 | 23.45 ± 0.01 | 6.49 ± 0.17 | 3.90 ± 0.04 | 59.63 ± 0.21 | 96.71 ± 0.06 | 26.99 ± 0.25a | 0.11 ± 0.03c | 27.10 ± 0.15a |
| MI 35 boiled | 3.11 ± 0.08 | 24.06 ± 0.07 | 6.24 ± 0.04 | 3.21 ± 0.28 | 59.29 ± 0.41 | 95.91 ± 0.33 | 18.15 ± 0.13b | 0.49 ± 0.07a | 18.64 ± 0.13b |
Values are expressed as means ± SD. Values in each column with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Antioxidant activity (AOA) and total phenolic content (TPC) of cold and hot extracts of cowpea powder
| Cultivar | Cold extract | Hot extract | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOA FRAP (μmol/g dry powder) | AOA DPPH (IC50 in mg) | TPC (mg/g dry powder) | AOA FRAP (μmol/g dry powder) | AOA DPPH (IC50 in mg) | TPC (mg/g dry powder) | |
| Bombay raw | 18.21 ± 1.68a,Q | 422.72 ± 2.68e,S | 4.62 ± 0.04a | 24.07 ± 1.39a,R | 255.70 ± 0.38e,T | 5.57 ± 0.35a |
| Bombay boiled | 5.61 ± 0.54c,Q | 780.23 ± 0.68a,S | 3.17 ± 0.1c | 7.86 ± 0.68c,R | 680.22 ± 0.88a,T | 3.25 ± 0.65b |
| Bombay sprouted | 5.23 ± 0.21c,Q | 720.72 ± 2.56b,S | 4.29 ± 0.05b | 8.21 ± 1.02c,R | 601.25 ± 0.40b,T | 5.01 ± 1.38a |
| MI 35 raw | 8.02 ± 0.04b,Q | 586.63 ± 0.48d,S | 2.63 ± 0.01d | 10.94 ± 0.41b,R | 347.90 ± 1.18d,T | 2.70 ± 0.05c |
| MI 35 boiled | 2.94 ± 0.01d | 602.42 ± 2.45c,S | 1.12 ± 0.04e | 3.51 ± 0.02d | 531.05 ± 1.08c,T | 2.03 ± 0.28d |
Values are expressed as means ± SD. Values in each column with different superscripts a to d are significantly different (p < 0.05). Values in each row with different superscripts Q to R for FRAP and S to T for DPPH for cold and hot extracts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Composition of experimental diets (1 Kg)
| Ingredients | Bombay (BRD) | Bombay Boiled (BBD) | Bombay Sprouted (BSD) | MI 35 (MRD) | MI 35 Boiled (MBD) | Control (CD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casein | 153 | 149 | 148 | 153 | 152 | 200 |
| Cowpea powder | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | – |
| Lard | 293 | 293.8 | 293 | 293.5 | 293.7 | 300 |
| Mineral Mixture | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin Mixture | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Cellulose Powder | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| L‐ Cystine | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Choline | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| TBHQ | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| α‐ Corn Starch | 163.49 | 166.69 | 168.49 | 162.99 | 163.79 | 309.49 |
AIN93G mineral and vitamin mixture.
Figure 1Serum Total cholesterol, High‐Density Lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), Non‐HDL‐cholesterol (Non‐HDL‐C), and triglyceride (TG) concentration in rats fed experimental diets for 6 weeks. Values are expressed as mean ± . Mean values within a group with different superscript letters are significantly different at p < 0.05
Initial body weight, final body weight, body weight gain, fecal weight, and cecal weight of rats fed experimental diets for 6 weeks
| Body weight | Liver weight (Wet/100 g/body weight | Fecal weight (g) | Cecal weight (g/100 g of BW) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial (g/rat) | Final (g/rat) | Gain (g/rat/6 weeks) | ||||
| BRD | 207.40 ± 16.45a | 351.80 ± 20.14a | 144.40 ± 9.01a | 2.85 ± 0.15b | 2.02 ± 0.44ab | 0.64 ± 0.12a |
| BBD | 209.20 ± 19.57a | 333.40 ± 43.36a | 124.20 ± 27.04a | 2.58 ± 0.07c | 2.22 ± 0.78a | 0.68 ± 0.12a |
| BSD | 209.60 ± 17.75a | 335.60 ± 28.97a | 126.00 ± 30.92a | 2.82 ± 0.30b | 2.20 ± 0.26a | 0.65 ± 0.08a |
| MRD | 215.20 ± 15.22a | 345.00 ± 15.57a | 129.80 ± 9.28a | 2.91 ± 0.10ab | 2.45 ± 0.33a | 0.68 ± 0.11a |
| MBD | 209.40 ± 18.75a | 330.80 ± 24.48a | 121.40 ± 10.80a | 2.60 ± 0.19c | 2.25 ± 0.78a | 0.67 ± 0.21a |
| CD | 222.60 ± 13.52a | 351.80 ± 4.50a | 128.00 ± 5.56a | 3.11 ± 0.12a | 1.62 ± 0.23b | 0.46 ± 0.32b |
BRD = HFD + 20% Bombay raw cowpea powder, BBD = HFD + 20% Bombay boiled cowpea powder, BSD = HFD + 20% Bombay sprouted cowpea powder, MRD = HFD + 20% MI 35 raw cowpea powder, MBD = HFD + 20% MI 35 boiled cowpea powder CD = HFD + Casein powder. Values are expressed as means ± SD. Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Serum antioxidant activity in rats fed experimental diets for 6 weeks. Values are expressed as mean ± . Mean values within a group with different superscript letters are significantly different at p < 0.05
Figure 3Cecal pH and cecal bacterial population of rats fed experimental diets for 6 weeks. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Mean values within a group with different superscript letters are significantly different at p < 0.05