Chlorosome antennae form an interesting class of materials for studying the role of structural motifs and dynamics in nonadiabatic energy transfer. They perform robust and highly quantum-efficient transfer of excitonic energy while allowing for compositional variation and completely lacking the usual regulatory proteins. Here, we first cast the geometrical analysis for ideal tubular scaffolding models into a formal framework, to relate effective helical properties of the assembly structures to established characterization data for various types of chlorosomes. This analysis shows that helicity is uniquely defined for chlorosomes composed of bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) d and that three chiral angles are consistent with the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron microscope data for BChl c, including two novel ones that are at variance with current interpretations of optical data based on perfect cylindrical symmetry. We use this information as a starting point for investigating dynamic and static heterogeneity at the molecular level by unconstrained molecular dynamics. We first identify a rotational degree of freedom, along the Mg-OH coordination bond, that alternates along the syn-anti stacks and underlies the (flexible) curvature on a larger scale. Because rotation directly relates to the formation or breaking of interstack hydrogen bonds of the O-H···O=C structural motif along the syn-anti stacks, we analyzed the relative fractions of hydrogen-bonded and the nonbonded regions, forming stripe domains in otherwise spectroscopically homogeneous curved slabs. The ratios 7:3 for BChl c and 9:1 for BChl d for the two distinct structural components agree well with the signal intensities determined by NMR. In addition, rotation with curvature-independent formation of stripe domains offers a viable explanation for the localization and dispersion of exciton states over two fractions, as observed in single chlorosome fluorescence decay studies.
Chlorosome antennae form an interesting class of materials for studying the role of structural motifs and dynamics in nonadiabatic energy transfer. They perform robust and highly quantum-efficient transfer of excitonic energy while allowing for compositional variation and completely lacking the usual regulatory proteins. Here, we first cast the geometrical analysis for ideal tubular scaffolding models into a formal framework, to relate effective helical properties of the assembly structures to established characterization data for various types of chlorosomes. This analysis shows that helicity is uniquely defined for chlorosomes composed of bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) d and that three chiral angles are consistent with the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron microscope data for BChl c, including two novel ones that are at variance with current interpretations of optical data based on perfect cylindrical symmetry. We use this information as a starting point for investigating dynamic and static heterogeneity at the molecular level by unconstrained molecular dynamics. We first identify a rotational degree of freedom, along the Mg-OH coordination bond, that alternates along the syn-anti stacks and underlies the (flexible) curvature on a larger scale. Because rotation directly relates to the formation or breaking of interstack hydrogen bonds of the O-H···O=C structural motif along the syn-anti stacks, we analyzed the relative fractions of hydrogen-bonded and the nonbonded regions, forming stripe domains in otherwise spectroscopically homogeneous curved slabs. The ratios 7:3 for BChl c and 9:1 for BChl d for the two distinct structural components agree well with the signal intensities determined by NMR. In addition, rotation with curvature-independent formation of stripe domains offers a viable explanation for the localization and dispersion of exciton states over two fractions, as observed in single chlorosome fluorescence decay studies.
The
largest light-harvesting antennae found in nature, the chlorosomes,
have evolved at an early stage and allow photosynthetic green bacteria
to survive under light-limiting conditions and at very low light intensity.[1] In contrast to other photosynthetic light-harvesting
antennae, for which a protein scaffold supports the structural order
and functionality, the chlorosome antenna function is accomplished
by hundreds of thousands bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) c, d, or e molecules that self-assemble
into pseudosymmetric syn–anti parallel stacks forming curved
sheets and concentric tubes.[2] Although
every chlorosome has a unique structure, they all share the common
feature of long-range transfer of extended excitons over distances
of several hundreds of nanometer.Whereas high BChl concentrations
in solution would result in energy
dissipation and loss, owing to a rapid quenching of excitonic energy,
nature has managed to avoid this in chlorosomes by a protein-free
encoding of distinct, functional BChl packings that display remarkable
homogeneity and have gross structural variability at the supramolecular
and higher levels. Consequently, there is much interest in obtaining
a fundamental understanding of structure–dynamics–function
relations in chlorosomes, including how quasi-coherent exciton transfer
driven by nuclear motion enables the near-unity yield. This principle
can potentially be exploited for more efficient, sustainable, and
environmentally clean ways of converting solar energy via the rational
design of molecular components for artificial photosynthesis. Currently,
it is unclear how the hierarchy of structural and dynamical properties
enables an amazing quantum efficiency for transfer within and between
tubes, and the dominant mechanisms are strongly debated.[3,4]Persistent variability in the form of two components that
are each
well-ordered on a local scale has been concluded from the pronounced
splitting of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signals for several
mutants.[5] A recent study of single chlorosomes
confirms the NMR finding that the variations in the molecular arrangement
and the microscopic disorder over the whole chlorosome assembly are
limited.[6] The optical linewidths of ∼100
cm–1 that can be extracted for individual chlorosomes,
comprising both static and dynamic disorder, confirm the remarkably
homogeneous molecular arrangement in two components observed with
MAS NMR. The four peaks in polarization-resolved fluorescence-excitation
data were attributed to low- and high-energy doublets for separate
structure motifs with slightly different characteristics, that is,
curvature and molecular arrangement. Their attribution to quantitatively
different tubes contrasts with the earlier MAS NMR and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) investigations, which alternatively attributed
the two components to transition regions between domains within the
tube. The single layer line and other details of the MAS NMR and TEM
diffraction responses for different chlorosome species and mutants[5] provide converging evidence that tubes in extended
tube structures are quantitatively equivalent.Our starting
point for the current computational study comes from
two types of structural information. Information on the short-range
structure—an elementary syn–anti dimer—was previously
derived from NMR data[7] and later refined
by Miloslavina et al. (unpublished results),
for details see Figure S7. The arrangement
of these elementary dimers, with a medium-range order extending over
several tens of monomers, was revealed by a layer line in the power
spectra calculated from cryo-EM images, collected from more homogeneous
mutant chlorosomes,[7] which can be used
for extracting the overall helicity. The helical nature of the chlorosome
is conserved upon variation of the BChl composition, and a Bijvoet
pair of spots on the equator reveals well-determined intertube spacings
around 2 nm, depending on the species.[2]In addition, several groups have carried out optical measurements
to estimate an angle θ for the effective transition dipole moment
relative to the symmetry axis of the tubular aggregates from the dichroic
ratio.[8−11] The response to excitation is clearly a collective phenomenon, meaning
that this angle does not necessarily translate down to the level of
individual molecules.[8] However, the ratio
of the oscillator strengths along the two principal directions was
shown to directly relate to the angle β, see Figure , for monomer transition dipole
moments if one assumes a perfect cylindrical lattice model that satisfies
special symmetry conditions,[6,12] which provides an additional
geometrical constraint. For bchR mutant chlorosomes,
the measured ratio translates into β ≈ 56.1° and
β ≈ 52.2° for the two structural components, values
that are well in line with the orientation of the molecular dipoles
in the original bchQRU model by Ganapathy et al.[7] and a structure for the wide type (WT) by Miloslavina
et al. (unpublished results). Nevertheless, because assembly structures
can notably deviate from the idealized situation that is at the basis
of this explicit relation, we will not regard this information as
a strict constraint in this work.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the angular
relations in a tubular structure.
The angle between the cylinder axis (O∥) and the induced molecular transition dipole moment (the so-called
monomeric transition) is given by β, its angle with the vector of the Bravais lattice by η, and
the chiral angle by δ. For δ between 0° and γ,
β = |(δ – 90° + η)|. We note that chiral
angle with respect to the parallel symmetry axis, δ∥, is obtained as δ∥ = |δ – 90°|.
Moreover, we selected a Bravais reference frame such that the rolling
vector varies between and . Hence, the chiral angle defined in Günther
et al.[6] differs from ours and is equal
to |180° – δ|, with δ our chiral angle.
Schematic illustration of the angular
relations in a tubular structure.
The angle between the cylinder axis (O∥) and the induced molecular transition dipole moment (the so-called
monomeric transition) is given by β, its angle with the vector of the Bravais lattice by η, and
the chiral angle by δ. For δ between 0° and γ,
β = |(δ – 90° + η)|. We note that chiral
angle with respect to the parallel symmetry axis, δ∥, is obtained as δ∥ = |δ – 90°|.
Moreover, we selected a Bravais reference frame such that the rolling
vector varies between and . Hence, the chiral angle defined in Günther
et al.[6] differs from ours and is equal
to |180° – δ|, with δ our chiral angle.Using unconstrained all-atom molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations,
we first evaluate the stability of the pseudosymmetric syn–anti
motifs, that is, the principle building block of chlorosomes determined
from NMR, and then study the propensity of such syn–anti stacks
to form concentric chiral tube structures, thereby departing from
the ideal tube model. By performing simulations for an initially planar
system, containing either BChl c or BChl d, we resolve the molecular origin of curvature and determine
the distinct structural variability and global dynamic heterogeneity
of the BChls within a curved assembly. Recent computational work based
on molecular mechanics and density functional theory (DFT) has not
been able to reveal these basic properties[13] because their phase space exploration capability is too limited.[14] As the time scale
τ for structural rearrangement scales as τ ≈ ξ, with ξ the correlation length (∼size)
and z > 0 a dynamical exponent that depends on
the
kinetic model, the starting structure for large-scale MD simulations
should be chosen with care to avoid kinetic trapping. We start all
simulations from a planar Bravais lattice provided by the most recently
proposed triclinic unit cells for BChl d.[7] In studies of electronically excited states,
the molecular structure is usually generated by projecting regular
two-dimensional (2D) Bravais lattices onto ideal tubes.[6,15−21] As a reference to our MD results, we first refine such idealized
models by a geometric analysis that links the position of the layer
line for the syn–anti stacks to an overall chirality that satisfies
all considered experimental constraints.The nanosecond MD simulations
in this work show that defined curvature
develops spontaneously for planar systems and confirms that symmetry
breaking is an inherent property of parallel stacking of the pseudosymmetric
syn–anti BChl dimer building blocks. According to our simulations,
a rotational degree of freedom around the Mg–OH coordination
bond enables molecules to resolve frustration, at the expense of giving
up O–H···O=C interstack hydrogen bonds,
and assume adaptive curvature of sheets or tubes. The signal ratios
for the two fractions determined from the splitting of NMR signals
matches the ratio of hydrogen-bonded and nonbonded domains in the
simulations of a single tube, which provides a first sound structural
basis for the presence of two well-defined structural components,
randomly distributed over the curved helical structure. We note that,
in a helical structure, a majority phase is likely to percolate and
that the simulated diffraction response for this structure confirms
that these diffractions give rise to a single layer line in reciprocal
space, in agreement with the cryo-EM diffraction response. We note
that the syn–anti parallel stacking leads to polar sheets and
cylinders with extended dipoles along the central axis, rendering
the lowest exciton states strongly delocalized, twisting around the
tubes.[6,9] Because dipoles and transition dipoles of
concentric cylinders overlap in space, correlated dynamics will give
rise to fluctuations of the cylinder dipoles and time-dependent detuning
of energy levels that may give rise to quantum instabilities. Here,
we provide the first detailed structural and dynamical information
beyond the current, idealized picture of chlorosomes, which is a valuable
starting point for future studies of vibrational-excitonic coupling.
Computational Details
The OPLS-AA force field[22,23] was used for all simulations.
All initial structures of pigment molecules (BChl c or d) were optimized using DFT calculations (HF/6-31G*
or higher level). The equilibrium bond and angle values in the force
field were obtained from optimized DFT structures, giving special
care to the Mg atom. To maintain an ∼0.21 nm coordination distance
between Mg and O, their Lennard-Jones nonbonded interaction parameters
were selected based on Roccatano et al.[24] In addition, four Mg–N bonds were added to keep the Mg atom
centered within the ring.Atomic point-charge parameters were
obtained by the RESP method[25] at the HF/6-31G*
level using Gaussian03 software.[26] Charges
obtained at the B3LYP/6-31G* level were
also considered. By comparing them, we focused on their effect on
packing by extracting lattice parameters for a small simulated system
(5 × 5 dimers). We found that lattice parameters vary only very
slightly (within 5%) with the chosen method. For larger simulated
systems, we expect equivalent variations.MD simulations with
periodic boundary conditions along all dimensions
were performed with the Gromacs 5.1.2 software package.[27,28] A particle-mesh Ewald method[29] was used
to treat the long-range electrostatic interactions. We performed simulations
in a NVT canonical ensemble, maintaining the simulation temperature
by a V-rescale[30] thermostat. Additional
details are provided in the Supporting Information simulation method section. We simulated the assembly of 172-farnesyl-(R or S)-[8-ethyl,12-ethyl]BChl c or d pigments, which have been considered
extensively in the experimental and simulation literature.[5,7,13,31] The ratio between R and S components in the dimer is 1:1 in agreement
with Ganapathy et al.[7]Our initial
simulation structures are planar, obtained by prolongating
the proposed syn–anti dimer structure periodically. The lattice
is defined in terms of two principle directors and , with length a = || and b = || relating to the experimental
repeat distances and their mutual angle γ (see Figure S7C). The whole structure, in terms of the number of
periodic repeats of dimers along these two directions, is denoted
as (A, B), for example, the structure in FigureS7C is for (5, 5).
Results and Discussion
Refinement of the Ideal Tube Model
Since their development
in the 1970s, Fourier–Bessel reconstruction
methods have become a major tool for reconstructing the three-dimensional
structure of naturally occurring helical assemblies such as actin,
myosin filaments, microtubules, amyloid fibrils, and bacterial flagella
from 2D electron micrographs. The theory and challenges, associated
with indexing and assigning helical symmetry for complicated assemblies
similar to proteins, can be found in a number of review papers,[32−35] and explicit geometrical relations between the layer line position
and the chiral BChl packing on a tubular lattice in terms of (variable)
unit cell parameters are provided in the Supporting Information. For these relations to hold exactly, one only
has to assume an ideal tube model for the chlorosome; in the remainder,
we will perform unconstrained MD simulations to investigate whether
this is justified. We note that this idealized representation renders
the geometrical description of chlorosomes and inorganic single-walled
nanotubes (SWNT) equivalent, apart from the particular Bravais lattice.In mathematical terms, our analysis focuses on finding appropriate
solutions for the underdetermined system of equations that relate
the four principal unknowns, that is, the parameters (a, b, and γ) for the dimeric unit cell and
the chiral angle δ, to the layer line position (1/d) determined from TEM. Inspired by the NMR and TEM findings, we consider
a δ that is invariant under changes of the tube radius R and conserve the unit cell for chlorosomes that feature
different layer line positions. Solutions in previous works were based
on selecting chiral angles δ from packing considerations that
directly related to unit cell parameters, resulting in the well-known
packing models: δ = 90° for the WT with d = a = 1.25 nm and δ = 0° for bchQRU with d = b sin(γ)
= 0.83 nm.[7] Since their publication, these
models have been debated and further refined.[6,36,37] For example, recent optical experiments
for single chlorosomes linked 1/d = 1/1.24 nm–1 for a bchR mutant,[6] equal to the WT value (1/1.25 nm–1) within
the considered resolution, to two chiral angles δ = (71 ±
2)° for two different structural components. This is equivalent
to δ = (109 ± 2)° in our framework (see the caption
of Figure ).On relating the one visible experimental layer line to geometrical
properties of the chiral BChl stacks in the Fourier–Bessel
framework, our key challenge boils down to selecting the proper helical
family on the tube,[34,35] given that each helical family
constitutes one layer line in the reciprocal space. In particular,
the distance to the equator for that layer line relates to the reciprocal
value of the axial repeat d for that helical family.
As discussed in more detail in the Supporting Information, we concentrate on calculating d that corresponds to the principal (0,1) and (1,0) helical families,
by a geometrical analysis of the Bravais lattice in real space because
they, together with the (1,1) helical family, represent the closest
packing or most stable spacings in the tube in the considered range
of δ. Moreover, it is known that a small tilt of the tube with
respect to the plane of imaging can produce a meridian signal[32] and that replacing idealized point scatters
by actual vibrating molecules can give rise to an amplification or
weakening of the layer line intensity, which explains why only one
reflection of these principal helical families is observed in the
noisy power spectrum. A power spectrum calculated directly from a
3-tube aggregate with a distinct layer line at 1/d = 1/1.25 nm–1, Figure S6, clearly illustrates this effect. Adopting the nomenclature of Moody
et al.,[38] the axial repeat d is the repeat distance along the tube axis between adjacent helices
(for a n-start helical family, d = P/n), and the pitch P is defined as the axial advance after one complete helix
turn. Figure shows
the theoretically predicted axial repeat distance d versus chiral angle δ for three candidate helical families—d and d, corresponding to the assembly along the and direction,
respectively, and darmchair, corresponding
to an analogue of the armchair conformation in SWNT—rendered
for the equilibrium unit cell parameters of the simulated (30, 30)
BChl c system: (a, b, γ) = (1.48,0.98,124.3°) at 300 K. For these unit cell
parameters, our geometrical analysis predicts a unique solution δ0.83 = 13° (or, with respect to the tube axis, δ∥ = 77°) for bchQRU and three
candidate solutions for the WT. One of these candidates, δ1.25 = 50° (δ∥ = 40°), implies
that chirality varies only gradually with a change of the molecular
side groups because both BChl c and d stacks wrap along the same direction.
The two other candidates for the WT, δ1.25 = 80°
(armchair, δ∥ = 10°) and δ1.25 = 112° (δ∥ = 22°) (wrapping
along ), imply that a change of the
side groups gives rise to a topological transition.
Figure 2
Axial repeat d, d, and darmchair, relating
to the H(1,0), H(0,1), and H(1,1) helical families, respectively,
as a function of the chiral angle δ ∈ [0, γ]. The
solid lines were calculated using geometrical analysis; symbols highlight
the same relations for discrete equidistant values of δ. For
each helical family, the axial repeat d determines
the layer line position in the diffraction pattern as 1/d. We have highlighted special cases, for example, δ = 0,90.
For the lattice parameters (a, b, γ), we adopt the values determined from our MD simulation
(1.48, 0.98, 124.3°), respectively. Between δ = 0 and δ
= γ, the cylinder topology changes, meaning that the lattice
rolling direction changes from along to along , with a cross-over chiral
angle δc given by a cos(δc) = b cos(γ – δc). The predicted chiral angles based on the layer line position are
labeled by white circles: 12.7° for bchQRU type,
49.6° or 112.3° for WT chlorosomes and the corresponding
predicted β angles are 46.9°, 10.0°, and 52.7°,
respectively, see more details in Figure S9.
Axial repeat d, d, and darmchair, relating
to the H(1,0), H(0,1), and H(1,1) helical families, respectively,
as a function of the chiral angle δ ∈ [0, γ]. The
solid lines were calculated using geometrical analysis; symbols highlight
the same relations for discrete equidistant values of δ. For
each helical family, the axial repeat d determines
the layer line position in the diffraction pattern as 1/d. We have highlighted special cases, for example, δ = 0,90.
For the lattice parameters (a, b, γ), we adopt the values determined from our MD simulation
(1.48, 0.98, 124.3°), respectively. Between δ = 0 and δ
= γ, the cylinder topology changes, meaning that the lattice
rolling direction changes from along to along , with a cross-over chiral
angle δc given by a cos(δc) = b cos(γ – δc). The predicted chiral angles based on the layer line position are
labeled by white circles: 12.7° for bchQRU type,
49.6° or 112.3° for WT chlorosomes and the corresponding
predicted β angles are 46.9°, 10.0°, and 52.7°,
respectively, see more details in Figure S9.The predicted chiral angles δ0.83 = 13° for bchQRU and δ1.25 = 112° for the WT
are consistent with the earlier proposed values in Ganapathy et al.[7] if one accounts for the different dimensions
of the unit cell. In particular, the -axis in our larger unit cell needs to be tilted to match the experimentally
determined pitch length; hence, we find δ1.25 = 112°.
Following this reasoning, the unprecedented prediction δ1.25 = 50° can be understood in terms of a similar tilt
in the opposite direction.As mentioned in the introduction,
a recent study for individual bchR mutant chlorosomes,
composed of slightly modified BChl c, determined
an average angle β ≈ 55°
(with respect to the tube axis) for the induced monomer dipoles, from
the ratio of parallel and perpendicular oscillator strengths. Yet,
the angle θ estimated from the dichroic ratio by earlier studies
is often smaller (θ = 15–25°) or distributed over
a broader range, which has been interpreted in terms of structural
variation between species[11,39] or in terms of the
preparation method.[9,36] Straightforward analysis of the
average angle β between the orientation of the BChl head groups
and the symmetry axis in our setup, see Figure S9, shows that δ1.25 = 112° agrees well
with β ≈ 55°. Nevertheless, MD simulations show
that prepacked nested three-tube BChl c assemblies
are stable for both tested values of δ1.25, that
is, δ1.25 = 50° and 112°, and layer line
positions determined by FFT are in excellent agreement with the predicted
values.We may benefit from the fact that we optimized local
structure
by MD to extract specific unit cell parameters directly from the simulated
(30, 30) BChl d system (see Figure S8 for details). We considered the most cylindrical structure
(1 ns at 50 K) to allow for easy extraction of unit cell parameters
and δ, giving rise to (a, b, γ) = (1.46, 0.93, 122.5°) and δ = 19.1°.
Inserting these unit cell parameters in the general expression for d provides the alternative
unique solution δ = 19.8° for d = 0.83 nm. Comparing it to the extracted chiral
angle δ = 19.1°, we find that they match very well; therefore,
we will consider δ0.83 = 19.8° in the remainder.
Thus, although our simulated BChl d aggregate is
too partial to provide a well-defined layer line by a direct procedure,
see discussion in the Supporting Information, this equivalence between simulated and theoretical values leads
us to conclude that the longer-range structural properties of the
simulated BChl d aggregate match very well with the
ones for the bchQRU mutant containing an excess of
[E, M]BChl d.As a comment to earlier work,[6] we find
that the experimentally observed sequence of tube radii is fully consistent
with two fixed chiral angles, δ0.83 and δ1.25, for nested tubes in the two systems. We considered δ1.25 = 112° in this analysis, but note that it is illustrative
for the other two values of δ1.25. Restricting the
maximum variation of δ to a tiny |Δδ| < 0.2°,
lattice periodicity plays a role in determining which radii are commensurate,
but we find that commensurate R very consistently
matches the experimental values, see Figure S4 in the Supporting Information. This analysis also shows
that a maximum variation of only 1° is sufficient to produce
any tube radius R, given that the discrete increment
δR that stems from lattice restriction is on
the order of the experimental resolution. Our simulations thus show
that the tube radius is essentially a scale-free parameter, that is,
not restricted by any inherent length-scale in the system. This interesting
observation agrees well with the nucleation and growth formation kinetics
of chlorosomes[31,40] because it allows for flexibility
to adopt any radius to tightly wrap new layers around an existing
(and possibly defected) nucleus.
MD Simulation
Results
Unconstrained
MD simulation allows us to gain fundamental insight in the deviations
from the ideal case and the origin of curvature, as well as relate
local structure to global properties of the assembly. Our analysis
of MD simulation results focusses on the following complementary aspects:
(I) large-scale structure and evolution, as well as properties (radius R, pitch P, and chiral/pitch angle δ)
of the spontaneously formed tubular structures, including the overall
conformation of the farnesyl-tails. (II) Local structural details
by an in situ analysis of the curved aggregates, concentrating on
stabilizing factors and interactions, and on the relative rotation
between syn–anti and anti–syn pairs, which provides
quantitative insight into the driving factors for curvature formation.
(III) Since local dynamics changes the detailed network of interactions
between BChls, in particular, the hydrogen bonding, we also evaluated
the dynamics of this rotational degree of freedom and its role in
the formation of hydrogen bonded domains. We focused on the angular
sampling statistics for an isolated dimer and consequently evaluated
the role of these twisting motion in our simulated structures.
Large-Scale Structure: Intrinsic and Flexible
Curvature
Our MD simulations provide computational evidence
that the proposed local syn–anti stacking model[7] gives rise to a stable aggregate, with initial forces that
are well within bounds and a tendency to spontaneously curve on the
scale of the aggregate. Figure S12 shows
MD simulation snapshots for an initially planar sheet, built from
(30, 30) BChl c syn–anti dimer stacks, that
wraps quickly as a whole to form a helical tube structure well within
1 ns (full trajectory available in Supporting Information Movie S1). The obtained curved structure remains
stable when further simulated in hexane solvents. To determine the
effective tube radius at the end of the simulation, we used a least-square
algorithm to fit a cylinder to the coordinates of the Mg atoms, see Figure S12a. Helical features of the BChl packing
along the tube can be observed both visually and from the characteristic
peaks in the calculated 2D Fourier spectrum for the Mg atoms, see Figure S12b. The fast kinetics and accompanying
jump in the potential energy (Figure S12c) suggest that the curved structure is thermodynamically much more
stable than the planar structure, and that the driving force for this
transition is rather large. This argues against a curvature-invariant
system, with curvature purely induced by thermal fluctuations, which
is usually a very slow process.The packing parameters obtained
by simulation, (a, b, γ) =
(1.48, 0.98, 124.3°) for BChl c and (1.46, 0.93,
122.5°) for BChl d, see Table S1, are based on the analysis of the local packing of
neighboring dimer units assuming a planar arrangement, which is a
valid assumption for large tube radii. Overall, we find that the packing
into a curved tubular structure is quite regular, with small static
heterogeneity, which is in agreement with the visual observation of
regular packing of Mg atoms (Figure S12b). We have additionally applied a procedure introduced by Connolly[41] on part of the simulated structure, using the
standard 1.4 Å Connolly radius, to determine its effective volume
and consequently the BChl c density as 1.348 g/cm3, which compares well with the density of 1.31 g/cm3 determined by X-ray crystallography for ethyl chlorophyllide a dihydrate.[42]The tube
structure obtained by 50 K NVT simulation remains stable
after increasing the temperature to 300 K. The packing parameters
show almost no dependence on the simulation temperature, that is,
the relative change in the packing parameters is within 2% upon equilibration
at 300 K, which is negligible. Yet, globally, the radius of the fitted
cylinder can be seen to change significantly from 9.335 to 6.840 nm
(Figure b). This variation
of the tube radius, for a structure with very similar local packing
features, reveals the sensitivity of our assembly structure to temperature,
and the flexibility to adjust the assembly properties on a large scale
while conserving the packing on a local scale. We further consider
this relation by performing a geometrical analysis.
Figure 3
Simulation results obtained
for different systems: (a) (30, 30)
BChl c system at 50 K, (b) (30, 30) BChl c system at 300 K, which started from the final structure
obtained at 50 K, and (c) (40, 30) m-BChl c system at 300 K, i.e., in the absence of the farnesyl
tail. Cylinders are fitted to the coordinates of the Mg atoms using
the same procedure as in Figure S12. All
sizes are scaled equivalently, enabling a proper visual analysis of
relative sizes. From left to right, the radius of the fitted cylinder
is 9.3, 6.8, and 6.1 nm, respectively. For clarity, side groups of
the head part and tails are not shown.
Simulation results obtained
for different systems: (a) (30, 30)
BChl c system at 50 K, (b) (30, 30) BChl c system at 300 K, which started from the final structure
obtained at 50 K, and (c) (40, 30) m-BChl c system at 300 K, i.e., in the absence of the farnesyl
tail. Cylinders are fitted to the coordinates of the Mg atoms using
the same procedure as in Figure S12. All
sizes are scaled equivalently, enabling a proper visual analysis of
relative sizes. From left to right, the radius of the fitted cylinder
is 9.3, 6.8, and 6.1 nm, respectively. For clarity, side groups of
the head part and tails are not shown.
Large-Scale Structure: Helicity
The simulated assemblies for BChl c are defected
but clearly tubular and, on a local scale, pigments can be seen to
adopt a helical arrangement; therefore, it makes sense to perform
a quantitative analysis in terms of large-scale structural properties:
the tube radius R and pitch P and
the earlier discussed chiral angle δ of the helix, also known
as the pitch angle. For structures obtained after 1 ns simulation,
simulated at different temperatures, see Figure b, we find that both R and P decrease monotonically with increasing temperature. However,
the third parameter, δ, adopts a constant value of δ ≈
31°. The only exception is T = 50 K, where the
chiral angle is significantly lower (Figure c). However, as our simulations are performed
sequentially, using the 1 ns result obtained at 50 K as input for
a simulation at higher T after (local) equilibration,
the deviating chiral angle for 50 K can be explained in terms of the
reduced simulation time, if we disregard the alternative explanation
of a genuine structural transition in the range of 50–100 K.
Figure 4
(a) Illustration
of the principle helical family H(1,0) and its relation
to the radius, pitch, and chiral angle. (b,c)
Large-scale properties (cylinder radius, pitch, and chiral angle)
for temperatures in the range 50–300 K, as determined for the H(1,0) helical family for the (30, 30) BChl c system after 1 ns simulation: (b) Fitted cylinder radii R and pitch P at different simulation temperatures
and (c) fitted chiral angles δ at different simulation temperatures.
With increased temperature, both the radius and pitch decrease, whereas
the chiral angle first increases and then assumes a constant value,
suggesting a structural transition between 50 and 100 K. These results
show that the chiral angle is the only conserved structural property,
with the pitch adapting to a particular radius.
(a) Illustration
of the principle helical family H(1,0) and its relation
to the radius, pitch, and chiral angle. (b,c)
Large-scale properties (cylinder radius, pitch, and chiral angle)
for temperatures in the range 50–300 K, as determined for the H(1,0) helical family for the (30, 30) BChl c system after 1 ns simulation: (b) Fitted cylinder radii R and pitch P at different simulation temperatures
and (c) fitted chiral angles δ at different simulation temperatures.
With increased temperature, both the radius and pitch decrease, whereas
the chiral angle first increases and then assumes a constant value,
suggesting a structural transition between 50 and 100 K. These results
show that the chiral angle is the only conserved structural property,
with the pitch adapting to a particular radius.All simulated curved aggregates are only partial tubes after
1
ns simulation, meaning that the periodicity imposed by the Bravais
lattice, which may affect helical properties, does not play a role
at that stage. In the absence of the farnesyl tail, see Figure , the initially flat m-BChl c sheet curves and closes upon itself
within 1 ns to form a closed (complete) tube. The extracted chiral
angle δ for this system is somewhat larger (∼40°)
than that for the partial tubes, but we lack insight in the particular
role of the tail on this property. An axial repeat d = 1.0 nm, close to b = 0.98 nm, was extracted (see Figure S5) from the layer line in the simulated
electron microscopy images for the full tube. This value agrees with
the geometrical prediction for δ = 40° in Figure and the real-space observation
that the tube symmetry axis is almost parallel to .All partial tubular structures appear stable on the
1 ns time scale
of the simulation. Continuing the simulation for the highest considered
temperature, T = 300 K, shows that the partial tube
does close up after roughly 2 ns. Closing up stabilizes the structure:
the tube diameter is constant and the rugged connection zone does
not notably change, either via (local) reorganization of dis-/reconnection,
in the following 8 ns simulation. Apparently, although a flat structure
is unstable, the thermodynamic driving force for structural reorganization
away from a nonoptimal δ and/or radius is tiny and/or the rearrangement
kinetics is too slow to be captured by MD. On the basis of these arguments,
we conclude that the processing history and/or the environment (e.g.,
solvent or lipids) is vital for obtaining the appropriate chirality
by MD, which agrees well with experimental information on this system.[43] We may, however, assume that enhanced kinetics
will give rise to a chiral structure featuring the predicted δ1.25 = 50° rather than the other two options, δ1.25 = 80° and δ1.25 = 112°, which
require a topological transition. We also note that partial tube structures
that are observed in experiments can be interpreted as a lack of material
needed for fully closing up. Overall, these findings are consistent
with a templated formation of concentric tubes, in which newly forming
layers can easily adapt their curvature to an existing nucleus while
reproducing the local packing characteristics of that nucleus. Helicity
plays a key role in this proposed mechanism, as a helical pigment
arrangement is the only option for accommodating a continuously varying
tube radius.
Large-Scale Structure:
Symmetry Breaking
In principle, there are two out-of-plane
directions in which the
planar symmetry can be broken. Each of them gives rise to a curved
structure with different chirality and with different (syn or anti)
tail domains at the concave or convex side of the curved structure.
We may distinguish these options in terms of ± × , that is, the cross-product
of two principle directors, see Figure S7c. In particular, tails distribute to either side of the tube, depending
on the head type (syn or anti) to which they are attached, owing to
the mutually parallel orientation of the pigment heads in the elementary
syn–anti dimer,[7] showing that local
packing plays a key role in the distribution of tails. This tail distribution
is in strong contrast to antiparallel head–head dimer stacking
which would lead to both tails naturally ending up at one side of
the stack; see Pandit et al.’s work[44] for a classification of molecular stacking options for related zinc-chlorins.Despite limited statistics, only one curving direction (− × )
is consistently found in all simulations. Also, without the (farnesyl)
tails, that is, when considering m-BChl c instead, the head stacks curve in the same direction. This preferential
direction is equivalent to syn tails always ending up at the concave
side for all curved structures (see Figure ). The appearance of a preferential helical
chirality is a feature of chiral asymmetry.
Figure 5
Details of the syn–anti
packing for the curved structure
obtained after 1 ns MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K. Syn and anti BChl c molecules are
shown in red and blue, respectively. (a) Curved structure (repeated
from Figure S12a) and fitted cylinder.
For clarity, side groups of head part and tails are not shown; (b)
syn–anti packing of heads, showing high order of head parts
even in curved domain; (c) projection of the pigment assembly along
the cylinder axis with and without tails, displaying the spatial extent
of the tails in the curved structure. The concave (convex) side of
the curved structure is covered by syn (anti) tails, respectively;
and (d) details of the tail structure, illustrating the groovelike
nature of the tail phase at the concave side of the curved structure,
leaving enough free space for other molecules to occupy, as well as
the liquid-crystal-like order of the tail phase for this low temperature.
Details of the syn–anti
packing for the curved structure
obtained after 1 ns MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K. Syn and anti BChl c molecules are
shown in red and blue, respectively. (a) Curved structure (repeated
from Figure S12a) and fitted cylinder.
For clarity, side groups of head part and tails are not shown; (b)
syn–anti packing of heads, showing high order of head parts
even in curved domain; (c) projection of the pigment assembly along
the cylinder axis with and without tails, displaying the spatial extent
of the tails in the curved structure. The concave (convex) side of
the curved structure is covered by syn (anti) tails, respectively;
and (d) details of the tail structure, illustrating the groovelike
nature of the tail phase at the concave side of the curved structure,
leaving enough free space for other molecules to occupy, as well as
the liquid-crystal-like order of the tail phase for this low temperature.The actual chirality of natural/mutant
chlorosomes could be extracted
by circular dichroism (CD), which would enable us to validate our
finding of chiral asymmetry. In practice, however, CD spectra for
such psi-type assemblies show undesired variability.[2,11,45] Theoretically, the magnitude
and sign of these spectra were not only shown sensitive to various
particular structural properties[46] but
also the same three-band (−, +, −) CD signal was calculated
for quite different tubular dipole arrangements by related methods
based on point-dipole approximations.[8,12,37] Nevertheless, for chlorosomes that most closely match
the studied systems, that is, the bchQRU containing
primarily BChl d(47) and
an artificial one composed of only BChl cs,[11] the same type I spectrum[11] was measured, which may be attributed to our
type of dipole arrangements based on the available information.[12]Distributed between the tubular stacks,
tails determine the intertube
structure and spacing. Ideal tube models, that is, single tubes obtained
from a lattice of dimers by projection,[6,15−21] usually consider tails to be fully extended orthogonal to the tubular
domain, as the experimental data do not provide sufficient information
on tail conformations in the assembly. We find that tails adhere to
head groups belonging to adjacent dimers, see Figure d, which explains why simulations for dimers
fail to capture these tail configurations. Consequently, the orthogonal
projection of the end-to-end distance (d⊥) is quite small (|d⊥|/|d| ≈ 0.2, see Figure S10), when compared to the fully extended chains (|d⊥|/|d| ≈ 1.0) in current
projection models.To analyze whether our tail configurations
directly relate to the
interlayer distance dexp = 2.0–2.1
nm determined from Bijvoet pairs for multitubular WT and mutant chlorosomes,[7] we determined the thickness of the simulated
tail layer. For our aggregates, which comprise a single tube in vacuo,
we find that the interlayer distance matches the experimental value
2.1 nm quite well (see Figure S11). In
contrast, fully stretched tails in ideal models would translate into
a substantially increased interlayer distance. This finding gives
us confidence to conclude that the tail configurations in our MD simulations
are also realistic for a multitube system, suggesting that tails from
different tubes do not experience notable interpenetration.From the simulation snapshot shown in Figure d, tails can be seen to bundle together on
a larger scale, leaving sufficient space to accommodate small molecules
similar to the carotenoids that were extracted from natural chlorosomes.[48] Although less ordered than heads, tails adopt
a liquid crystallike order at low temperatures when considered locally
(Figure b,d).Although tails fill the interstitial space between tube layers
and determine their spatial separation, they are not a key factor
in curvature formation. The latter can be concluded from simulation
of a (40,30) m-BChl c sheet at 300
K (Figure c), where
large scale curvature forms spontaneously in the absence of farnesyl
tails. Thus, we conclude that curvature formation originates from
head–head packing.
In Situ Analysis: Stabilizing
Factors
Next, we analyze the interaction network between
neighboring BChl c by considering the nearest distance
distribution of interacting
groups in the head domain and their overlap ratio. Two types of pair
interactions stand out: (i) the interactions between magnesium and
oxygen atoms (Mg···O–H in Figure a) coordinate neighboring pigments along
the packing direction . (ii) Hydrogen
bonds formed between the hydroxyl group and the carbonyl oxygen, see
O–H···O= in Figure a, stabilize the molecular assembly along
the direction. Because each pigment
molecule contains a donor (hydroxyl group oxygen) and an acceptor
(carbonyl group oxygen), which are both capable of forming hydrogen
bonds, three states are needed to describe this bonding: “2-hb”,
that is, both donor and acceptor form hydrogen bonds, “1-hb”,
that is, either donor or acceptor forms a hydrogen bond, and “0-hb”,
that is, no hydrogen bond is formed.
Figure 6
Analysis of key interactions in the assembly,
as determined from
the curved structure obtained by MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K after 1 ns. (a) Schematic representation
of the interacting groups that promote pigment assembly along the
packing direction and ; (b) distribution of nearest distances between
Mg and O atoms, important for coordination between Mg and OH groups;
(c) distribution of nearest distances between OH and O=, important
for hydrogen bonds formed between neighboring carbonyl oxygen and
hydroxyl group; (d) distribution of nearest distances between stacking
layers, important for π–π interactions. The mean
value is 0.356 nm, which is a characteristic value for π–π
stacking; and (e) head–head stacking overlap ratio along and directions.
The overlap ratio calculation is based on the van der Waals geometry
of carbon atoms in the head part, ignoring substitutes.
Analysis of key interactions in the assembly,
as determined from
the curved structure obtained by MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K after 1 ns. (a) Schematic representation
of the interacting groups that promote pigment assembly along the
packing direction and ; (b) distribution of nearest distances between
Mg and O atoms, important for coordination between Mg and OH groups;
(c) distribution of nearest distances between OH and O=, important
for hydrogen bonds formed between neighboring carbonyl oxygen and
hydroxyl group; (d) distribution of nearest distances between stacking
layers, important for π–π interactions. The mean
value is 0.356 nm, which is a characteristic value for π–π
stacking; and (e) head–head stacking overlap ratio along and directions.
The overlap ratio calculation is based on the van der Waals geometry
of carbon atoms in the head part, ignoring substitutes.We find that the distribution of Mg···O–H
distances is narrow with an average around 0.21 nm (Figure b). In contrast to the Mg and
O–H groups, which always coordinate to each other, we find
that not all neighboring O= and O–H groups always form
hydrogen bonds. We quantify this property by considering the ratio
between the actual number of hydrogen bonds between donors and acceptors
and the total number of donors and acceptors. For the (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, this ratio is approximately 0.7, meaning
that 70% of all possible hydrogen bonds is actually formed, see details
in Figure S13. We note that, for a system
with a similar packing, modification of groups that are capable of
hydrogen bonding did not destabilize the assembly.[49] This confirms our finding that the formation of hydrogen
bonds along the direction is not vital
for the stability of the assembly structure. To conclude this analysis,
the ratio extracted from the simulated BChl d structures
at 50 K is around 0.9, meaning that both simulated values are consistent
with the signal-splitting ratios in the NMR experiments of chlorosome
containing an excess of BChl c (7:3) and BChl d (9:1).[5,7]We attribute the overall
stability of the assembly along both and directions
to the unique π–π stacking between the head parts
along both directions. Earlier static calculations for Zn-chlorins[49] confirm this conclusion. The packing distance
between head parts for our system is found to be 0.356 nm (Figure d), as determined
from the average line distance, which is a characteristic value for
π–π stacking. The really unique feature in this
structure is that, along the direction,
heads only partially overlap owing to the Mg···O–H
coordination, which is compensated by a partial overlap along the direction: the head–head packing
overlap ratios along the and directions were determined as 0.39 and
0.2, respectively, see Figure e. In this way, π–π stacking plays a role
along both directions, strengthening the interaction framework of
the assembled structure.
In Situ Analysis: Curvature-Inducing
Factors
Dimers that satisfy the key stabilizing factors of
the larger assembly,
that is, coordination and π–π overlap, have only
one degree of freedom left: to adjust their rotation relative to their
neighbors. In particular, one can anticipate that curvature should
originate from consistent adjustment of relative rotation angles throughout
the whole structure. For this reason, we extracted the relative rotational
angle α between adjacent pigments, which is defined as the angle
between Mg···O= and Mg···Mg vectors
after being projected on one molecule’s rigid ring surface
(Figure a), with the
aim of providing quantitative molecular insight in the origin of large-scale
curvature formation.
Figure 7
Orientational details of head–head stacking, extracted
from
the curved structure obtained in the MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, after 1 ns. (a) Typical intradimer and
interdimer stacking configurations associated with a positive and
negative relative rotational angles, respectively. Although the syn–anti
dimer is the basic structural element; on the level of individual
pigment, there is an alternating packing of syn–anti (intradimer)
and anti–syn (interdimer) configurations. The relative rotational
angle α is defined by the angle between Mg–O= and Mg–Mg
vectors (labeled as red and blue arrows) after being projected on
the top molecule’s rigid ring surface. The sign is determined
by the direction of the cross-product of the two vectors; (b) individual
values for the rotational angles along the assembly structure; and
(c) distribution of intradimer and interdimer rotation angles, illustrating
the asymmetry in packing.
Orientational details of head–head stacking, extracted
from
the curved structure obtained in the MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, after 1 ns. (a) Typical intradimer and
interdimer stacking configurations associated with a positive and
negative relative rotational angles, respectively. Although the syn–anti
dimer is the basic structural element; on the level of individual
pigment, there is an alternating packing of syn–anti (intradimer)
and anti–syn (interdimer) configurations. The relative rotational
angle α is defined by the angle between Mg–O= and Mg–Mg
vectors (labeled as red and blue arrows) after being projected on
the top molecule’s rigid ring surface. The sign is determined
by the direction of the cross-product of the two vectors; (b) individual
values for the rotational angles along the assembly structure; and
(c) distribution of intradimer and interdimer rotation angles, illustrating
the asymmetry in packing.It should be understood that, although a syn–anti
dimer
is the structural element, packing in a larger structure gives rise
to alternating syn–anti (intradimer, αintra) and anti–syn (interdimer, αinter) pairs,
see Figure . The sign
of α is determined by the cross-product of the two key vectors;
for typical pairs, αintra > 0 and αinter < 0. Analyzing all pairs in the curved structure for T = 50 K (1 ns), we find that the signature of alternating
positive and negative α is well-maintained throughout the large
assembly (Figure b).
Analyzing their distributions over the curved structure, see Figure c, shows that a broad
range of α values is sampled. This rotational heterogeneity
may contribute to the broadening of the optical spectra. Closer examination
suggests a slight asymmetry, that is, ⟨αintra⟩ + ⟨αinter⟩ = −2.78°.
Improving the statistics, however, by adding snapshots of a tubular
structure along the simulation trajectory, does not give a unimodal
distribution but clarifies that the sampling of this rotational degree
of freedom is broad (see Figure S14) with
a mild preference for specific α values.To allow for
more firm conclusions about symmetry breaking, we
performed additional analysis. In particular, we introduced a simplified
representation with handedness and consider Δβ = βintra – βinter, with the angles βintra and βinter determined as in the inset
of Figure . Using
geometrical arguments, it is easy to show that one obtains a tubular
structure with helical ordering for , where the bar represents the average value.
Analysis of simulated curved structures along the simulation trajectory
at 50 K indeed suggests that such a nonzero exists, as can be seen from the peak position
of the Δβ distribution (Figure ). Increasing the temperature (to T = 300 K) transforms this bimodal distribution into a unimodal
Gaussian-like distribution centered around . The unimodal nature
of this distribution
is clearly the result of increased thermal fluctuations (Figure S15), which helps the system to overcome
energy barriers along this rotational coordinate. This finding is
consistent with the large-scale analysis of the helical tube structures
(see earlier section).
Figure 8
Distribution of difference (βintra –
βinter) between neighboring intradimer and interdimer
rotation
angles in the representation that incorporates handiness, as extracted
from the curved structures along a MD trajectory for a (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, between 500 ps to 1 ns. The inset shows
the intradimer and interdimer configurations and the way the corresponding
angles βintra and βinter are determined.
When the intradimer (anti–syn) and interdimer (syn–anti)
configurations are (anti-)symmetric, the packing-angle difference
βintra – βinter is 0°.
Nevertheless, a major distribution peak around 12.6° > 0°
appears, suggesting consistent asymmetry between the chiral intradimer
and interdimer configurations in the curved structure. Such asymmetry
is the origin of the transition from the translational symmetry in
the initial flat structure to helix symmetry in the simulated curved
structure. Moreover, reconstructing structures containing alternating
syn and anti representation with a fixed positive βintra – βinter value gives rise to an anticlockwise
growth and a curved structure. Such a curved structure is consistent
with the curved structure obtained in simulation when syn tails are
located in the concave side of the curved structure.
Distribution of difference (βintra –
βinter) between neighboring intradimer and interdimer
rotation
angles in the representation that incorporates handiness, as extracted
from the curved structures along a MD trajectory for a (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, between 500 ps to 1 ns. The inset shows
the intradimer and interdimer configurations and the way the corresponding
angles βintra and βinter are determined.
When the intradimer (anti–syn) and interdimer (syn–anti)
configurations are (anti-)symmetric, the packing-angle difference
βintra – βinter is 0°.
Nevertheless, a major distribution peak around 12.6° > 0°
appears, suggesting consistent asymmetry between the chiral intradimer
and interdimer configurations in the curved structure. Such asymmetry
is the origin of the transition from the translational symmetry in
the initial flat structure to helix symmetry in the simulated curved
structure. Moreover, reconstructing structures containing alternating
syn and anti representation with a fixed positive βintra – βinter value gives rise to an anticlockwise
growth and a curved structure. Such a curved structure is consistent
with the curved structure obtained in simulation when syn tails are
located in the concave side of the curved structure.Our detailed analysis illustrates how the pseudosymmetry
of the
elementary structure develops into a well-defined asymmetry, via symmetry
breaking in the head–head packing, which is the basis for large-scale
curvature formation at a molecular level. The global flexibility to
adopt varying curvature should also be seen to originate from the
local head–head packing. Because the distribution of Δβ
is rather broad, the assembly is rather flexible in incorporating
various curvatures on a larger, global scale.
In
Situ Analysis: Hydrogen Bonding
We consider the curved structure
at 50 K to analyze the formation
of hydrogen bonds using the three-state description introduced earlier.
We find that different states are organized into striped domains on
the projected 2D structure, see arrows in Figure , meaning that they form helices on the tube,
as discussed in the theory section in the Supporting Information. Interestingly, almost all “0-hb”
states (no hydrogen bonding) are next to “2-hb” states
(fully hydrogen bonded).
Figure 9
Hydrogen bonding states for individual molecules
along the curved
structure obtained in MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, after 1 ns. Depending on the number of hydrogen
bond formed on a molecule, three states are defined: “2-hb”(dark
blue), “1-hb”(light blue), and “0-hb”
(white).
Hydrogen bonding states for individual molecules
along the curved
structure obtained in MD simulation of (30, 30) BChl c system at 50 K, after 1 ns. Depending on the number of hydrogen
bond formed on a molecule, three states are defined: “2-hb”(dark
blue), “1-hb”(light blue), and “0-hb”
(white).With the appearance of “0-hb”
and “1-hb”
states in Figure ,
it is clear that not all residues capable of hydrogen bonding are
“saturated”. As mentioned previously, around 70% of
these residues do form hydrogen bonds in this curved BChl c structure at 50 K. Correlating the two local properties,
rotation and hydrogen bonding, via the absolute value of the relative
rotation angle distribution |α|no-hbonding for molecules that are not-hydrogen bonded (the absolute value of
the rotation angle is sufficient because we do not need to distinguish
between inter- and intradimer pairs) shows that hydrogen bonds are
broken when the relative rotations exceed some threshold value, with
|α|no-hbonding distribution peaking around
35°. In particular, hydrogen bonds do not interfere with the
interaction between neighboring Mg and carbonyl group oxygen atoms
(the Mg···O= interaction is strongest for |α|
= 0°, see Figure S16 for distribution
and analysis details.)
Dynamics: Rotational
Sampling Distribution
Although the total number of hydrogen
bonds can be seen to converge
to a constant value with time, see Figure S13, their distribution over the curved structure varies considerably
with time. Hydrogen bonds between molecules in neighboring stacks
are formed and broken in a concerted manner to conserve their overall
number, but no diffusion of striped “0-hb”, “1-hb”,
or “2-hb” domains as a whole was observed, see Supporting
Information Movie S2. In combination with
the narrow distribution of donor–acceptor spacings, see Figure , these findings
clarify the correlation between the relative rotation angle α
and hydrogen bonding between BChl stacks and signify the role of individual
BChl c rotations in the curved structure.We
further zoomed-in by performing spectral analysis of time traces of
the relative rotational angle α for a number of well-chosen
dimers, making sure to select combinations of monomers that belong
to different states, that is, “0-hb”, “1-hb”,
or “2-hb”, at the end of the trajectory. Analysis of
individual traces shows that hydrogen bonding does affect this rotational
dynamics, by modulating the amplitude of the variations in α.
Yet, we find that all calculated spectra in the frequency domain consistently
show a band around 125–180 cm–1, see the Supporting Information for details. We tentatively
assign this band to the 145 cm–1 low-frequency mode
observed by ultrafast spectroscopy.[3,4]Finally,
we analyzed the sampling distribution of the relative
rotational angle α, see Figure , for a dimer to obtain a better understanding of the
rotational dynamics in the larger aggregate. This reduced dimeric
system enabled us to perform a much longer (50 ns) MD simulation,
which considerably improves the sampling statistics. Our choice for
the m-BChl c dimer means that we
neglect the influence of tails and of the matrix of surrounding dimers.
Figure 10
Distribution
of the relative rotation angle for m-BChl c dimer, obtained by simulating a syn–anti
dimer at 200 K. The whole 50 ns MD simulation trajectory was considered.
Three characteristic configurations are selected for potential energy
comparison between fully atomistic and quantum modeling, see Table , and are denoted
by arrows; the fourth, a transition state, is only considered in the
context of MD. The simulation temperature was chosen to provide sufficient
phase space sampling while maintaining a chlorosome-like syn–anti
packing.
Distribution
of the relative rotation angle for m-BChl c dimer, obtained by simulating a syn–anti
dimer at 200 K. The whole 50 ns MD simulation trajectory was considered.
Three characteristic configurations are selected for potential energy
comparison between fully atomistic and quantum modeling, see Table , and are denoted
by arrows; the fourth, a transition state, is only considered in the
context of MD. The simulation temperature was chosen to provide sufficient
phase space sampling while maintaining a chlorosome-like syn–anti
packing.
Table 1
Potential Energy Comparison of the
Three Stable Characteristic Configurationsa
state
I
II
III
IV
angle α (deg)
–0.2
21.5
57.5
98.1
MD (kJ/mol)b
0
4.0
15.4
9.0
AIMD (kJ/mol)c
0
15.7
36.7
For MD, the potential energy of
the transition state is added to give an idea of the energy barrier.
For AIMD, the average energy of the reference state is reported, and
the reported energies for other configurations are differences.
Reference value 2563.9 (kJ/mol).
Reference value −782.449
(hartree).
The simulated rotational angle
distribution for this dimer reveals
that several configurations are stable: a higher probability relates
to more stable configurations or a lower potential energy via the
Boltzmann factor. We identify two dominant rotation angles: αI ≈ 0° and αII ≈ 20°.
Indeed, the Mg and O= groups are in closest contact for αI, which is associated with the highest probability density.
For αII, the probability is only slightly reduced
and the intermediate depression is not very pronounced, suggesting
that the energetic barrier between states αI and
αII is rather modest. Beyond these two peaks, that
is, α > αII, the clear drop of probability
density hints at the presence of a more pronounced energetic barrier,
which is consistent with the probability distribution data extracted
for the large assembly in Figure c.Four characteristic configurations (labeled
by the associated α)
were selected for direct potential energy comparison (Figure ): three values for stable
states (αI,II,IV) along this angular coordinate and
an intermediate or transition state (αIII). We find
that αI indeed has the lowest potential energy, followed
by αII with an increase in the order of 5 kJ/mol.
The change of the potential energy for αIV is still
modest (see Table ), whereas the transition state αIII is indeed associated with the highest increase. The reduced
head–head overlap that accompanies an increasing α clearly
gives rise to destabilization of the structure or an increased potential
energy. This is consistent with the larger assembly structure, where
the probabilities of these larger α’s are indeed considerably
reduced, see Figure . To test the consistency of our MD force fields, we complemented
this analysis by a potential energy calculation by ab initio MD (AIMD),
using the characteristic configurations from MD as input for AIMD
equilibration. AIMD confirms the stability of the three stable MD
states (see Supporting Information for
details of the procedure). Moreover, the potential energy trends are
very similar, see Table , albeit that the potential energy surface for MD is clearly flattened
compared to AIMD.For MD, the potential energy of
the transition state is added to give an idea of the energy barrier.
For AIMD, the average energy of the reference state is reported, and
the reported energies for other configurations are differences.Reference value 2563.9 (kJ/mol).Reference value −782.449
(hartree).
Final Discussion
The heterogeneity
in chlorosomes appears because of frustration, as a result of the
competition between the stabilizing network of interactions and curvature-driven
rotation away from the preferential conformation in a syn–anti
dimer motif. The aggregation of BChl in sheets and tubular assemblies
are apparently not compatible with the formation of an array of H
bonds that are commensurate with the Bravais lattice formed by the
BChl. The resulting H-bonding defects form stripes that are randomly
distributed over the system but appear pinned to the underlying lattice.
In particular, because the rotational mode is soft, H bonds can be
switched on and off, and we may think of parallels to the folding
funnel in proteins. The random distribution of pinned defects over
the pseudosymmetric lattice shows that every chlorosome is unique
all the way down to the supramolecular level.Our computational
results provide an alternative explanation for the two sets of superradiant
states that were tentatively attributed to two types of tubes in a
single chlorosome:[6] the full width at half
maximum of the frequency spectrum associated with our rotational mode
is 30–40 cm–1, that is, well within the residual
broadening of ∼100 cm–1, inferred from fluorescence
excitation experiments, that should cover both static and dynamic
heterogeneity. In the ground state of the imperfect lattice, several
modes are enhanced and contribute to a disordered energy landscape.
Because the energy levels of the BChl will depend on its position
along the rotational coordinate and the H bonding, it is tempting
to conclude that such modes can give rise to nonadiabatic coupling
elements for quasi coherent energy transfer by resonant coupling upon
crossing of exciton levels. The relatively strong vibrational band
centered around 160 cm–1 agrees well with the time
scale of 100 fs for rapid exciton transfer in chlorosomes determined
by coherent optical spectroscopy.[3]
Conclusions
Detailed information on the structure and
heterogeneity in natural
chlorosomes provides necessary insight toward the understanding of
the unique excitonic properties of these assemblies and enables the
design of synthetic mimics with similar efficiency. In this study,
we have combined a formal geometrical analysis and unconstrained all-atom
MD to obtain unique insight in the direct relation between molecular
detail and structure, curvature formation, symmetry breaking, and
stabilizing factors, as well as static and dynamic heterogeneity within
a curved structure. An intriguing finding is that out-of-plane rotation
and hydrogen bonding compete, which identifies a new type of heterogeneity
that is consistent with NMR observations.From a structural
perspective, the overarching question is how
and why nature selects particular chiral angles for structuring within
the considered chlorosomes. Here, the “how” is clarified:
by building in asymmetry at the molecular level, which translates
into specific chirality at the macroscale. We find that our MD simulations
in vacuo properly capture this mechanism for the BChl d system, where the δ = 19.1° extracted from the simulated
aggregate agrees very well with the predicted δ0.83 = 19.8° of bchQRU. For BChl c, our theoretical analysis predicts three chiral angles δ1.25 that match the experimental NMR and cryo-EM information.
The tube topology for the chiral angles extracted from simulation,
δ = 31° with farnesyl tail and δ = 40° without
tails, that is, curved along the direction
of strongest interactions, agrees with one of these predictions, δ1.25 = 50°. Yet, optical measurements for single chlorosomes[6] were combined with theory to predict an orientation
of the monomeric transition dipoles that only agrees with δ1.25 = 112°, that is, curved along the direction, albeit that this prediction is uncertified for
structures that do not agree with the special symmetry conditions
of the theory.[12] An independent way to
ascertain the actual helicity is to numerically calculate the optical
spectra for our candidates based on a Frenkel Hamiltonian,[8] which will additionally allow us to evaluate
details, such as signals originating from two distinct structural
components that are lost in the averaging procedure. Nanosecond MD
simulations of preassembled structures (single and multiple tubes)
for the alternative δ1.25 confirm their stability.Overall, clearly many factors secure the molecular organization
in natural chlorosomes, such as the formation kinetics, matrix templating,
and/or nesting, which agrees well with the experimental finding that
spectroscopic properties of reconstituted structures crucially depend
on processing conditions. The detailed insight provided in this study,
into the molecular origin of large-scale curvature and structure,
local packing and dynamics within the confines of the curved aggregates,
has a general value and validity and will serve as input and inspiration
for more detailed computational investigations of excitonic-vibrational
coupling.
Authors: Swapna Ganapathy; Gert T Oostergetel; Piotr K Wawrzyniak; Michael Reus; Aline Gomez Maqueo Chew; Francesco Buda; Egbert J Boekema; Donald A Bryant; Alfred R Holzwarth; Huub J M de Groot Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anjali Pandit; Kasim Ocakoglu; Francesco Buda; Thomas van Marle; Alfred R Holzwarth; Huub J M de Groot Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Nicolas Coudray; Ralph Lasala; Zhening Zhang; Kathy M Clark; Mark E Dumont; David L Stokes Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Anna S Bondarenko; Ilias Patmanidis; Riccardo Alessandri; Paulo C T Souza; Thomas L C Jansen; Alex H de Vries; Siewert J Marrink; Jasper Knoester Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 9.825