| Literature DB >> 30258346 |
Yu-Chun Chen1, Yi-Chen Huang1,2, Yuan-Ting C Lo1, Hsing-Juan Wu3, Mark L Wahlqvist1,2,4,5, Meei-Shyuan Lee1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare two Nutrition and Health Surveys in Taiwan (NAHSITs) 15-18 years apart to evaluate secular changes in ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and expenditure among Taiwanese adolescents aged 16-18 years and the influences of such changes on dietary quality.Entities:
Keywords: NAHSIT; NOVA; Taiwan; Ultra-processed food; adolescent; dietary quality
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258346 PMCID: PMC6150927 DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Fig. 1NOVA classification system.
Participant characteristics of the 1993–1996 and 2011 NAHSITs
| NAHSIT 1993–1996 | NAHSIT 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Total | Boys | Girls | Total | Boys | Girls |
| 788 | 391 | 397 | 1,274 | 633 | 641 | |
| YHEI-TwR-90 | 46.1 ± 0.6 | 46.2 ± 1.0 | 46.1 ± 1.0 | 45.3 ± 0.8 | 44.7 ± 0.8 | 46.0 ± 0.8 |
| YHEI-TwR-70 | 38.3 ± 0.5 | 38.1 ± 0.9 | 38.5 ± 1.0 | 37.2 ± 0.8 | 37.1 ± 0.8 | 37.2 ± 0.9 |
| Age (years) | 16.7 ± 0.1 | 16.6 ± 0.1 | 16.7 ± 0.1 | 16.6 ± 0.04 | 16.6 ± 0.1 | 16.5 ± 0.04 |
| Ethnicity (%) | ||||||
| Fukienese | 79.8 | 80.1 | 79.4 | 73.6 | 70.2 | 77.5 |
| Hakka | 9.9 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 12.1 | 13.3 | 10.8 |
| Mainlander | 9.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 10.7 | 12.5 | 8.7 |
| Indigenous | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.8 ± 0.2 | 21.0 ± 0.3 | 20.6 ± 0.2 | 22.0 ± 0.1 | 22.6 ± 0.2 | 21.4 ± 0.2 |
| Underweight | ||||||
| WHO std | 20.1 | 22.5 | 30.9 | 27.4 | 16.5 | 21.7 |
| Taiwan std | 13.3 | 8.5 | 18.3 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Normal | ||||||
| WHO std | 62.7 | 65.0 | 59.9 | 61.3 | 59.2 | 63.6 |
| Taiwan std | 66.6 | 73.1 | 60.1 | 61.4 | 59.3 | 63.8 |
| Overweight | ||||||
| WHO std | 12.3 | 10.1 | 6.3 | 7.9 | 15.7 | 10.7 |
| Taiwan std | 12.5 | 10.5 | 14.6 | 13.4 | 12.9 | 13.9 |
| Obese | ||||||
| WHO std | 4.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 8.6 | 4.0 |
| Taiwan std | 7.5 | 7.9 | 7.1 | 16.8 | 19.7 | 13.5 |
| TSF (cm) | 15.0 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 18.8 ± 0.6 | 17.7 ± 0.3 | 14.6 ± 0.4 | 21.0 ± 0.4 |
| WC (cm) | 66.9 ± 0.4 | 69.7 ± 0.6 | 64.1 ± 0.5 | 78.1 ± 0.3 | 79.6 ± 0.5 | 76.5 ± 0.4 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 67.0 ± 2.4 | 66.9 ± 2.7 | 67.0 ± 3.3 | 72.4 ± 1.1 | 74.0 ± 2.0 | 70.6 ± 1.2 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 91.6 ± 2.1 | 88.9 ± 2.7 | 94.2 ± 2.4 | 91.7 ± 0.9 | 89.9 ± 1.1 | 93.7 ± 1.3 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 57.7 ± 2.0 | 54.9 ± 1.8 | 60.2 ± 2.8 | 55.1 ± 0.4 | 51.6 ± 0.6 | 59.0 ± 0.4 |
NAHSIT, Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan; TSF, triceps skinfold thickness; WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; YHEI-TwR, Youth Healthy Eating Index–Taiwan Revised.
Values are weighted to reflect their representation in the population and are percentages of mean ± SE.
YHEI-TwR-90 total scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating higher dietary quality.
YHEI-TwR-70 scores not including soft drinks and snacks range from 0 to 70.
WHO standards (http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/)
Taiwanese standards (https://obesity.hpa.gov.tw/TC/BMIproposal.aspx)
Percentages of daily dietary energy intake and food expenditure for four food groups in the two surveys
| Total | Boys | Girls | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year of survey | Year of survey | Year of survey | |||||||
| 1993–1996 | 2011 | 1993–1996 | 2011 | 1993–1996 | 2011 | ||||
| 788 | 1,274 | 391 | 633 | 397 | 641 | ||||
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | |||||||||
| 2,059 ± 73.8 | 2,416 ± 59.1 | 0.003 | 2,555 ± 127 | 2,752 ± 77 | 0.222 | 1,563 ± 79.1 | 2,043 ± 49 | <0.001 | |
| Percent of energy intake | |||||||||
| G1 | 55.3 ± 0.8 | 38.8 ± 0.8 | <0.001 | 57.5 ± 1.7 | 41.5 ± 1.0 | <0.001 | 53.0 ± 1.2 | 35.8 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| G2 | 7.63 ± 0.8 | 13.0 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | 7.10 ± 0.4 | 13.1 ± 0.6 | <0.001 | 8.15 ± 1.4 | 12.9 ± 0.7 | 0.009 |
| G3a | 13.0 ± 0.4 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | <0.001 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 17.0 ± 0.9 | 0.022 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 18.8 ± 1.0 | 0.004 |
| G3b | 21.5 ± 1.1 | 25.5 ± 0.6 | 0.011 | 19.5 ± 1.9 | 23.5 ± 0.8 | 0.083 | 23.6 ± 1.2 | 27.6 ± 0.8 | 0.018 |
| Percent of expenditure on food | |||||||||
| G1 | 64.2 ± 1.3 | 58.6 ± 1.0 | 0.005 | 64.1 ± 2.0 | 60.4 ± 1.1 | 0.133 | 64.2 ± 1.6 | 56.6 ± 1.4 | 0.005 |
| G2 | 1.54 ± 0.3 | 4.75 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | 1.79 ± 0.5 | 4.48 ± 0.3 | 0.001 | 1.29 ± 0.2 | 5.07 ± 0.3 | <0.001 |
| G3a | 11.1 ± 1.3 | 13.4 ± 0.5 | 0.127 | 11.6 ± 1.3 | 11.6 ± 1.3 | 0.326 | 10.5 ± 1.5 | 13.8 ± 0.8 | 0.081 |
| G3b | 23.7 ± 1.0 | 23.2 ± 0.7 | 0.697 | 23.0 ± 2.0 | 22.1 ± 0.9 | 0.698 | 24.4 ± 1.0 | 24.5 ± 0.8 | 0.964 |
G1, original foods; G2, processed culinary ingredients; G3a, ready-to-eat processed foods; G3b, ready-to-eat ultra-processed foods.
Values are weighted to reflect their representation in the population and are calculated by mean ± SE.
Calculated by one-way analysis of variance.
Data are the mean ± SE of percentages of daily energy intake and food expenditure.
Distributions of daily macronutrient intakes and nutrient densities based on UPF consumption from NAHSIT 2011
| Total | Quartiles of UPF consumption | β | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||
| UPF energy (kcal/d) | 615 | 135 | 436 | 724 | 1,163 | ||
| Percent energy (%) | |||||||
| Carbohydrates | 53.0 | 50.6 | 51.7 | 52.8 | 56.9 | <0.001 | 0.20 |
| Protein | 15.1 | 16.7 | 15.7 | 14.8 | 13.1 | <0.001 | −0.12 |
| Fat | 32.4 | 33.0 | 32.9 | 32.8 | 30.7 | 0.004 | −0.07 |
| Nutrient density (per 1,000 kcal/day) | |||||||
| SFA (g) | 12.4 | 11.5 | 12.2 | 12.9 | 13.0 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
| MUFA (g) | 12.6 | 13.6 | 12.8 | 12.5 | 11.4 | <0.001 | −0.07 |
| PUFA (g) | 10.9 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 9.50 | <0.001 | −0.07 |
| Vitamins | |||||||
| Vitamin A (RE) | 289 | 368 | 331 | 231 | 225 | 0.004 | −5.30 |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 3.75 | 3.92 | 3.81 | 3.81 | 3.45 | 0.193 | −0.01 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 51.6 | 58.1 | 52.1 | 47.1 | 49.1 | 0.040 | −0.32 |
| Vitamin D (μg) | 2.06 | 2.48 | 2.05 | 1.90 | 1.81 | 0.017 | −0.02 |
| Vitamin B-1 (mg) | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.51 | <0.001 | −0.01 |
| Vitamin B-2 (mg) | 0.60 | 0.6 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.155 | −0.001 |
| Niacin (mg) | 8.93 | 9.65 | 9.49 | 8.82 | 7.77 | <0.001 | −0.06 |
| Vitamin B-6 (mg) | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.63 | <0.001 | −0.01 |
| Vitamin B-12 (μg) | 2.13 | 2.45 | 2.09 | 1.92 | 2.07 | 0.615 | −0.01 |
| Minerals | |||||||
| Potassium (mg) | 987 | 1,089 | 1,007 | 949 | 905 | <0.001 | −6.12 |
| Magnesium (mg) | 108 | 120 | 109 | 104 | 98.0 | <0.001 | −0.71 |
| Calcium (mg) | 215 | 226 | 219 | 210 | 203 | 0.100 | −0.80 |
| Iron (mg) | 7.36 | 7.88 | 7.61 | 7.14 | 6.83 | 0.037 | −0.04 |
UPF, ultra-processed food; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, mono-unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, poly-unsaturated fatty acids; vitamin B-1, thiamin; vitamin B-2, riboflavin.
Values are weighted to reflect their representation in the population.
UPF does not include alcoholic beverages or condiments.
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to test for differences in the UPF consumption energy ratio group.
Regression coefficient of the dietary micronutrient content in 10% of the total dietary caloric value from UPFs.
α-TE.
Preformed only.
Odds ratios (95% CI) for risk of poor dietary quality with a 10% increase in UPF energy intake or expenditure from NAHSIT 2011 (N = 817,658; n = 1,274)
| YHEI-TwR-90 Poor vs. good | 10% increase | |
|---|---|---|
| UPF energy intake | UPF expenditure | |
| Crude | 1.37 (1.22–1.54) | 1.36 (1.26–1.47) |
| Model 1 | 1.21 (1.05–1.39) | 1.35 (1.15–1.59) |
| Model 2 | 1.33 (1.16–1.52) | 1.36 (1.10–1.69) |
YHEI-TwR-90, Youth Healthy Eating Index–Taiwan Revised
Logistic regression was used to assess odd ratios (95% CI).
YHEI-TwR-90 total scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating higher dietary quality. The threshold between poor and good dietary quality was based on the mean score.
Model 1 was adjusted for the percentages of energy intake in G1 and G3a and total energy intake.
Model 1 was adjusted for food expenditure in G1 and G3a and total food expenditure.
Model 2 was further adjusted for gender, grade, locality, major caregivers, household income, household expenditure, mother’s education, smoking, alcohol drinking, and BMI.