Katie M O'Brien1,2, Alexandra J White2, Dale P Sandler2, Brian P Jackson3, Margaret R Karagas4, Clarice R Weinberg1. 1. From the Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC. 2. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC. 3. Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research Center at Dartmouth, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to trace elements may affect health, including breast cancer risk. Trace element levels in toenails are potentially useful biomarkers of exposure, but their reliability is not established. We assessed the reproducibility of toenail element concentrations over time and whether concentrations change following a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS: We assessed trace element levels in toenails collected at two time points from 221 women (111 with and 110 without an intervening breast cancer diagnosis). We measured levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, tin, vanadium, and zinc using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and 4-10 years later. We compared trace element concentrations over time using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (R). We used linear models to examine the magnitude and direction of changes and the influence of a breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, we observed positive correlations (R = 0.18-0.71) between paired samples for all trace elements. However, nickel (R = -0.02) and antimony (R = 0.12) were not correlated among cases. We observed decreases in cadmium, chromium, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, and lead between baseline and follow-up, but case status was unrelated to these changes. The declines are consistent with decreases over calendar time rather than age time. CONCLUSIONS: Toenail trace element concentrations were correlated over time, but many elements showed systematic decreases by calendar year. Aside from nickel and antimony, postdiagnostic toenail levels correlated with prediagnostic levels, providing support for using postdiagnostic toenail samples in retrospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to trace elements may affect health, including breast cancer risk. Trace element levels in toenails are potentially useful biomarkers of exposure, but their reliability is not established. We assessed the reproducibility of toenail element concentrations over time and whether concentrations change following a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS: We assessed trace element levels in toenails collected at two time points from 221 women (111 with and 110 without an intervening breast cancer diagnosis). We measured levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, tin, vanadium, and zinc using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and 4-10 years later. We compared trace element concentrations over time using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (R). We used linear models to examine the magnitude and direction of changes and the influence of a breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, we observed positive correlations (R = 0.18-0.71) between paired samples for all trace elements. However, nickel (R = -0.02) and antimony (R = 0.12) were not correlated among cases. We observed decreases in cadmium, chromium, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, and lead between baseline and follow-up, but case status was unrelated to these changes. The declines are consistent with decreases over calendar time rather than age time. CONCLUSIONS: Toenail trace element concentrations were correlated over time, but many elements showed systematic decreases by calendar year. Aside from nickel and antimony, postdiagnostic toenail levels correlated with prediagnostic levels, providing support for using postdiagnostic toenail samples in retrospective studies.
Authors: Jane A McElroy; Martin M Shafer; Ronald E Gangnon; Luis A Crouch; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Elizabeth A Platz; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Sandra C Hoffman; J Steven Morris; Connie K Baskett; George W Comstock Journal: Prostate Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Adrian Ruiz-Hernandez; Ana Navas-Acien; Roberto Pastor-Barriuso; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Josep Redon; Eliseo Guallar; Maria Tellez-Plaza Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Rachel Grashow; Jinming Zhang; Shona C Fang; Marc G Weisskopf; David C Christiani; Jennifer M Cavallari Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Angeline S Andrew; Katie M O'Brien; Brian P Jackson; Dale P Sandler; Wendy E Kaye; Laurie Wagner; Elijah W Stommel; D Kevin Horton; Paul Mehta; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Alexandra J White; Katie M O'Brien; Nicole M Niehoff; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Clarice R Weinberg; Alexander P Keil Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-16
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Alexandra J White; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Alexandra J White; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nicole M Niehoff; Alexander P Keil; Katie M O'Brien; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Clarice R Weinberg; Alexandra J White Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Alexander P Keil; Jessie P Buckley; Katie M O'Brien; Kelly K Ferguson; Shanshan Zhao; Alexandra J White Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Nicole M Niehoff; Katie M O'Brien; Alexander P Keil; Keith E Levine; Chamindu Liyanapatirana; Laura G Haines; Suramya Waidyanatha; Clarice R Weinberg; Alexandra J White Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897