BACKGROUND: Cadmium is a recognized human lung carcinogen that has also been positively associated with prostate cancer mainly in occupationally exposed men. The association between dietary and supplemental zinc intake and prostate cancer has not been consistent in epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the association between prediagnostic toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations and risk of prostate cancer in a cohort in which the primary route of exposure to cadmium and zinc is the diet. METHODS: Included in the analysis were 115 prostate cancer cases and 227 age-matched controls nested in the prospective CLUE II study located in Washington County, MD. Participants provided toenail samples at baseline in 1989. Furnace atomic absorption and flame atomic absorption were used to determine toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations, respectively. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations did not statistically significantly differ between prostate cancer cases (cadmium, 45.9 ppb; zinc, 155.3 ppm) and controls (cadmium, 54.5 ppb; zinc, 164.0 ppm). Prostate cancer risk did not increase with increasing concentrations of cadmium (P trend = 0.9) and did not decrease with increasing concentrations of zinc (P trend = 0.2). For both metals, the ORs for the top four fifths were each below 1.0 when compared with the bottom fifth. CONCLUSION: Men who have high toenail cadmium concentrations in the range observed in this general population sample were not at an increased risk for prostate cancer. Although there was no evidence of a linear dose-response, these findings suggest that risk of prostate cancer may be slightly lower among men with moderate and higher zinc intake. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Cadmium is a recognized human lung carcinogen that has also been positively associated with prostate cancer mainly in occupationally exposed men. The association between dietary and supplemental zinc intake and prostate cancer has not been consistent in epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the association between prediagnostic toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations and risk of prostate cancer in a cohort in which the primary route of exposure to cadmium and zinc is the diet. METHODS: Included in the analysis were 115 prostate cancer cases and 227 age-matched controls nested in the prospective CLUE II study located in Washington County, MD. Participants provided toenail samples at baseline in 1989. Furnace atomic absorption and flame atomic absorption were used to determine toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations, respectively. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median toenail cadmium and zinc concentrations did not statistically significantly differ between prostate cancer cases (cadmium, 45.9 ppb; zinc, 155.3 ppm) and controls (cadmium, 54.5 ppb; zinc, 164.0 ppm). Prostate cancer risk did not increase with increasing concentrations of cadmium (P trend = 0.9) and did not decrease with increasing concentrations of zinc (P trend = 0.2). For both metals, the ORs for the top four fifths were each below 1.0 when compared with the bottom fifth. CONCLUSION:Men who have high toenail cadmium concentrations in the range observed in this general population sample were not at an increased risk for prostate cancer. Although there was no evidence of a linear dose-response, these findings suggest that risk of prostate cancer may be slightly lower among men with moderate and higher zinc intake. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Todd M Everson; Maya Kappil; Ke Hao; Brian P Jackson; Tracy Punshon; Margaret R Karagas; Jia Chen; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Christine Neslund-Dudas; Albert M Levin; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Cathryn H Bock; Nora L Nock; Andrew Rundle; Michelle Jankowski; Richard Krajenta; Q Ping Dou; Bharati Mitra; Deliang Tang; Timothy R Rebbeck; Benjamin A Rybicki Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Alexandra J White; Dale P Sandler; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.822