Literature DB >> 30248459

Reverse left ventricular structural remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with preserved left ventricular function: Insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T1 mapping.

Johannes T Kowallick1, Wieland Staab2, Andreas Schuster3, Sören J Backhaus4, Mark Weber-Krüger4, Lukas Bauer2, Christian Sohns5, Joachim Lotz2, Gerd Hasenfuß4, Lars Lüthje4, Markus Zabel4, Leonard Bergau4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) improves left ventricular (LV) function in patients with LV systolic dysfunction, suggestive of underlying arrhythmia-induced adverse remodeling.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether arrhythmia-induced LV remodeling occurs in patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function and to assess whether this remodeling is reversible after restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation.
METHODS: Forty-three patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction 62% ± 7%) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging before catheter ablation including native T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. Twenty-five patients underwent follow-up CMR 3 months after catheter ablation. Twenty-two matched controls without AF underwent the same CMR protocol.
RESULTS: Patients with AF had higher baseline LV native T1 values than did controls (1296 ± 55 ms vs 1243 ± 55 ms; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 9 months (interquartile range 4-14 months), 17 patients (40%) experienced AF recurrence. No differences in baseline T1 values were observed between patients with and without AF recurrence. There was a significant decrease in native T1 values in patients with successful restoration of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation at 3 months of follow-up CMR (1300 ± 45 ms vs 1270 ± 55 ms; P < .01), while they remain unchanged in patients with AF recurrence (1303 ± 51 ms vs 1309 ± 31 ms; P = .64).
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that subclinical arrhythmia-induced LV structural remodeling occurs in patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function. This remodeling might be reversible after catheter ablation with successful restoration of sinus rhythm as quantified noninvasively and gadolinium-free by CMR native T1 mapping.
Copyright © 2018 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Catheter ablation; Left ventricular remodeling; T1 mapping

Year:  2018        PMID: 30248459     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Atrial fibrillation : Recent studies and new treatment options].

Authors:  Leonard Bergau; Christian Sohns; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 2.  [Rhythm and metabolic control].

Authors:  Denise Guckel; Christian Sohns; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.740

Review 3.  Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure.

Authors:  Leonard Bergau; Philipp Bengel; Vanessa Sciacca; Thomas Fink; Christian Sohns; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Echocardiographic assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and normal systolic left ventricular function before and after catheter ablation: If AF begets AF, does pulmonary vein isolation terminate the vicious circle?

Authors:  Aleksandra Liżewska-Springer; Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka; Ewa Lewicka; Tomasz Królak; Łukasz Drelich; Dariusz Kozłowski; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Posterior Wall Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Effects on Echocardiographic Parameters of cardiac function.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Neil Beri; Pankaj Malhotra; Rakhee Makhija; Eric Nordsieck; Adam Oesterle; Dali Fan; Nayereh Pezeshkian; Uma Srivatsa
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-10-31

6.  Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis: a comparison of different measurement approaches.

Authors:  Darius Dabir; Thomas M Vollbrecht; Julian A Luetkens; Daniel L R Kuetting; Alexander Isaak; Andreas Feisst; Rolf Fimmers; Alois M Sprinkart; Hans H Schild; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-determined left ventricular myocardium impairment is associated with C-reactive protein and ST2 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Songnan Li; Chen Zhang; Jie Tian; Aijia Lu; Rong Bai; Jing An; Andreas Greiser; Jie Huang; Xiaohai Ma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with end-stage heart failure and eligibility for heart transplantation.

Authors:  Christian Sohns; Nassir F Marrouche; Angelika Costard-Jäckle; Samuel Sossalla; Leonard Bergau; Rene Schramm; Uwe Fuchs; Hazem Omran; Kerstin Rubarth; Daniel Dumitrescu; Frank Konietschke; Volker Rudolph; Jan Gummert; Philipp Sommer; Henrik Fox
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-12-13

9.  Ventricular Restitution Predicts Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Horses.

Authors:  Julia Ramírez; Andrew Tinker
Journal:  Function (Oxf)       Date:  2020-12-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.