Lei Zhao1, Songnan Li2, Chen Zhang1, Jie Tian1, Aijia Lu1, Rong Bai2, Jing An3, Andreas Greiser4, Jie Huang5, Xiaohai Ma6. 1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen, China. 4. Siemens AG Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. 6. Department of Intervention, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. maxi8238@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial strain assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking can detect early left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation quantitatively in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases, but this method has not yet been applied to quantify myocardial strain in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and no coexistent cardiovascular disease, i.e., the early stage of AF. This study sought to compare LV myocardial strain and T1 mapping indices in AF patients and healthy subjects, and to investigate the associations of a portfolio of inflammation, cardiac remodeling and fibrosis biomarkers with LV myocardial strain and T1 mapping indices in AF patients with no coexistent cardiovascular disease. METHODS: The study consisted of 80 patients with paroxysmal AF patients and no coexistent cardiovascular disease and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Left atrial volume (LAV), LV myocardial strain and native T1 were assessed with CMR, and compared between the AF patients and healthy subjects. Biomarkers of C-reactive protein (CRP), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1), collagen III N-terminal propeptide (PIIINP), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) were obtained with blood tests, and compared between the AF patients and healthy controls. Associations of these biomarkers with those CMR-measured parameters were analyzed for the AF patients. RESULTS: For the CMR-measured parameters, the AF patients showed significantly larger LAV and LV end-systolic volume, and higher native T1 than the healthy controls (max P = 0.027). The absolute values of the LV peak systolic circumferential strain and its rate as well as the LV diastolic circumferential strain rate were all significantly reduced in the AF patients (all P < 0.001). For the biomarkers, the AF patients showed significantly larger CRP (an inflammation biomarker) and sST2 (a myocardium stiffness biomarker) than the controls (max P = 0.007). In the AF patients, the five CMR-measured parameters of LAV, three LV strain indices and native T1 were all significantly associated with these two biomarkers of CRP and sST2 (max P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF and no coexistent cardiovascular disease, LAV enlargement and LV myocardium abnormalities were detected by CMR, and these abnormalities were associated with biomarkers that reflect inflammation and myocardial stiffness.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial strain assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking can detect early left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation quantitatively in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases, but this method has not yet been applied to quantify myocardial strain in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and no coexistent cardiovascular disease, i.e., the early stage of AF. This study sought to compare LV myocardial strain and T1 mapping indices in AFpatients and healthy subjects, and to investigate the associations of a portfolio of inflammation, cardiac remodeling and fibrosis biomarkers with LV myocardial strain and T1 mapping indices in AFpatients with no coexistent cardiovascular disease. METHODS: The study consisted of 80 patients with paroxysmal AFpatients and no coexistent cardiovascular disease and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Left atrial volume (LAV), LV myocardial strain and native T1 were assessed with CMR, and compared between the AFpatients and healthy subjects. Biomarkers of C-reactive protein (CRP), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1), collagen III N-terminal propeptide (PIIINP), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) were obtained with blood tests, and compared between the AFpatients and healthy controls. Associations of these biomarkers with those CMR-measured parameters were analyzed for the AFpatients. RESULTS: For the CMR-measured parameters, the AFpatients showed significantly larger LAV and LV end-systolic volume, and higher native T1 than the healthy controls (max P = 0.027). The absolute values of the LV peak systolic circumferential strain and its rate as well as the LV diastolic circumferential strain rate were all significantly reduced in the AFpatients (all P < 0.001). For the biomarkers, the AFpatients showed significantly larger CRP (an inflammation biomarker) and sST2 (a myocardium stiffness biomarker) than the controls (max P = 0.007). In the AFpatients, the five CMR-measured parameters of LAV, three LV strain indices and native T1 were all significantly associated with these two biomarkers of CRP and sST2 (max P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF and no coexistent cardiovascular disease, LAV enlargement and LV myocardium abnormalities were detected by CMR, and these abnormalities were associated with biomarkers that reflect inflammation and myocardial stiffness.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation; Biomarkers; Left ventricle; Myocardial strain; T1 mapping
Authors: Liang-Han Ling; Peter M Kistler; Andris H Ellims; Leah M Iles; Geraldine Lee; Gerard L Hughes; Jonathan M Kalman; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Erin E Coglianese; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Jennifer E Ho; Anahita Ghorbani; Elizabeth L McCabe; Susan Cheng; Michael G Fradley; Dana Kretschman; Wei Gao; George O'Connor; Thomas J Wang; James L Januzzi Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Sumeet S Chugh; Rasmus Havmoeller; Kumar Narayanan; David Singh; Michiel Rienstra; Emelia J Benjamin; Richard F Gillum; Young-Hoon Kim; John H McAnulty; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Mohsen Naghavi; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Christopher J L Murray Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gordon A Begg; Rashed Karim; Tobias Oesterlein; Lee N Graham; Andrew J Hogarth; Stephen P Page; Christopher B Pepper; Kawal Rhode; Gregory Y H Lip; Arun V Holden; Sven Plein; Muzahir H Tayebjee Journal: Europace Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Cheyenne C S Tseng; Manon M H Huibers; Joyce van Kuik; Roel A de Weger; Aryan Vink; Nicolaas de Jonge Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Julio A Lamprea-Montealegre; Leila R Zelnick; Michael G Shlipak; James S Floyd; Amanda H Anderson; Jiang He; Rob Christenson; Stephen L Seliger; Elsayed Z Soliman; Rajat Deo; Bonnie Ky; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Christopher R deFilippi; Myles S Wolf; Tariq Shafi; Alan S Go; Nisha Bansal Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 5.501