Literature DB >> 30244837

The BRCT Domains of the BRCA1 and BARD1 Tumor Suppressors Differentially Regulate Homology-Directed Repair and Stalled Fork Protection.

David Billing1, Michiko Horiguchi1, Foon Wu-Baer1, Angelo Taglialatela2, Giuseppe Leuzzi2, Silvia Alvarez Nanez2, Wenxia Jiang3, Shan Zha4, Matthias Szabolcs5, Chyuan-Sheng Lin5, Alberto Ciccia6, Richard Baer7.   

Abstract

The BRCA1 tumor suppressor preserves genome integrity through both homology-directed repair (HDR) and stalled fork protection (SFP). In vivo, BRCA1 exists as a heterodimer with the BARD1 tumor suppressor, and both proteins harbor a phosphate-binding BRCT domain. Here, we compare mice with mutations that ablate BRCT phospho-recognition by Bard1 (Bard1S563F and Bard1K607A) or Brca1 (Brca1S1598F). Brca1S1598F abrogates both HDR and SFP, suggesting that both pathways are likely impaired in most BRCA1 mutant tumors. Although not affecting HDR, the Bard1 mutations ablate poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent recruitment of BRCA1/BARD1 to stalled replication forks, resulting in fork degradation and chromosome instability. Nonetheless, Bard1S563F/S563F and Bard1K607A/K607A mice, unlike Brca1S1598F/S1598F mice, are not tumor prone, indicating that HDR alone is sufficient to suppress tumor formation in the absence of SFP. Nevertheless, because SFP, unlike HDR, is also impaired in heterozygous Brca1/Bard1 mutant cells, SFP and HDR may contribute to distinct stages of tumorigenesis in BRCA1/BARD1 mutation carriers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BARD1; BRCA1; BRCT domain; DNA break repair; familial breast cancer; genome instability; poly(ADP-ribose); stalled replication forks; tumor suppression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30244837      PMCID: PMC6347115          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  55 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Inherited susceptibility to common cancers.

Authors:  William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA.

Authors:  Bianca M Sirbu; Frank B Couch; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Loss of Bard1, the heterodimeric partner of the Brca1 tumor suppressor, results in early embryonic lethality and chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Ellen E McCarthy; Julide T Celebi; Richard Baer; Thomas Ludwig
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Conservation of function and primary structure in the BRCA1-associated RING domain (BARD1) protein.

Authors:  T C Ayi; J T Tsan; L Y Hwang; A M Bowcock; R Baer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1998-10-22       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Structure and mechanism of BRCA1 BRCT domain recognition of phosphorylated BACH1 with implications for cancer.

Authors:  Julie A Clapperton; Isaac A Manke; Drew M Lowery; Timmy Ho; Lesley F Haire; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-05-09       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Elgene Lim; François Vaillant; Di Wu; Natasha C Forrest; Bhupinder Pal; Adam H Hart; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; David E Gyorki; Teresa Ward; Audrey Partanen; Frank Feleppa; Lily I Huschtscha; Heather J Thorne; Stephen B Fox; Max Yan; Juliet D French; Melissa A Brown; Gordon K Smyth; Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Structural requirements for the BARD1 tumor suppressor in chromosomal stability and homology-directed DNA repair.

Authors:  Marsha Laufer; Subhadra V Nandula; Ami P Modi; Shuang Wang; Maria Jasin; Vundavalli V V S Murty; Thomas Ludwig; Richard Baer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The BARD1 C-terminal domain structure and interactions with polyadenylation factor CstF-50.

Authors:  Ross A Edwards; Megan S Lee; Susan E Tsutakawa; R Scott Williams; I Nazeer; F E Kleiman; John A Tainer; J N Mark Glover
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.

Authors:  Sarah A Joseph; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Jen-Wei Huang; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-15

3.  Ca2+-Stimulated AMPK-Dependent Phosphorylation of Exo1 Protects Stressed Replication Forks from Aberrant Resection.

Authors:  Shan Li; Zeno Lavagnino; Delphine Lemacon; Lingzhen Kong; Alessandro Ustione; Xuewen Ng; Yuanya Zhang; Yingchun Wang; Bin Zheng; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Alessandro Vindigni; David W Piston; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Isomerization of BRCA1-BARD1 promotes replication fork protection.

Authors:  Manuel Daza-Martin; Katarzyna Starowicz; Mohammed Jamshad; Stephanie Tye; George E Ronson; Hannah L MacKay; Anoop Singh Chauhan; Alexandra K Walker; Helen R Stone; James F J Beesley; Jennifer L Coles; Alexander J Garvin; Grant S Stewart; Thomas J McCorvie; Xiaodong Zhang; Ruth M Densham; Joanna R Morris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Functional interrogation of DNA damage response variants with base editing screens.

Authors:  Raquel Cuella-Martin; Samuel B Hayward; Xiao Fan; Xiao Chen; Jen-Wei Huang; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Junfei Zhao; Raul Rabadan; Chao Lu; Yufeng Shen; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  How do mutations affecting the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause cancer susceptibility?

Authors:  Ashok R Venkitaraman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 7.  The antitumorigenic roles of BRCA1-BARD1 in DNA repair and replication.

Authors:  Madalena Tarsounas; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Human CST complex protects stalled replication forks by directly blocking MRE11 degradation of nascent-strand DNA.

Authors:  Xinxing Lyu; Kai-Hang Lei; Pau Biak Sang; Olga Shiva; Megan Chastain; Peter Chi; Weihang Chai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Clinical PARP inhibitors do not abrogate PARP1 exchange at DNA damage sites in vivo.

Authors:  Zhengping Shao; Brian J Lee; Élise Rouleau-Turcotte; Marie-France Langelier; Xiaohui Lin; Verna M Estes; John M Pascal; Shan Zha
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mechanisms of BRCA1-BARD1 nucleosome recognition and ubiquitylation.

Authors:  Qi Hu; Maria Victoria Botuyan; Debiao Zhao; Gaofeng Cui; Elie Mer; Georges Mer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.