Literature DB >> 30242345

Accuracy of the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score in Estimating Pretransplant Mortality Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Chung-Chou H Chang1,2,3, Cindy L Bryce1,3,4, Benjamin L Shneider5, Jonathan G Yabes1,2,3, Yi Ren2, Gabriel L Zenarosa6, Heather Tomko4, Drew M Donnell2,4, Robert H Squires7, Mark S Roberts1,3,4,6.   

Abstract

Importance: Fair allocation of livers between pediatric and adult recipients is critically dependent on the accuracy of mortality estimates afforded by the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease, respectively. Widespread reliance on exceptions for pediatric recipients suggests that the 2 systems may not be comparable. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the PELD score in estimating 90-day pretransplant mortality among pediatric patients on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients who were listed from February 27, 2002, to March 31, 2014, for primary liver transplant were included in this retrospective analysis and were followed up for at least 2 years through June 17, 2016. The study analyzed 2 cohorts using the UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data files. The full cohort comprised 4298 patients (<18 years of age) who had chronic liver disease (excluding cancer). The reduced cohort (n = 2421) excluded patients receiving living donor transplantation or PELD exception points. Main Outcomes and Measures: Observed and expected 90-day pretransplant mortality rates evaluated at 10-point interval PELD levels.
Results: Among the 4298 patients in the full cohort (mean [SD] age, 2.5 [4.2] years; 2251 [52.4%] female; 2201 [51.2%] white), PELD scores and mortality were concordant (C statistic, 0.8387 [95% CI, 0.8191-0.8584] for the full cohort and 0.8123 [95% CI, 0.7919-0.8327] for the reduced cohort). However, the estimated 90-day mortality using the PELD score underestimated the actual probability of death by as much as 17%. Conclusions and Relevance: With use of the PELD score, the ranking of risk among children was preserved, but direct comparisons between adult and pediatric candidates were not accurate. Children with chronic liver disease who are in need of transplant may be at a disadvantage compared with adults in a similar situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242345      PMCID: PMC6248160          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  24 in total

1.  PELD: working well, but only half of the time?

Authors:  John C Magee; Sandy Feng
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  A new prognostic model to predict dropout from the waiting list in cirrhotic candidates for liver transplantation with MELD score <18.

Authors:  Maurizio Biselli; Marco Dall'Agata; Annagiulia Gramenzi; Stefano Gitto; Caterina Liberati; Lucia Brodosi; Matteo Ravaioli; Martina Gambato; Roberto Montalti; Antonio D Pinna; Patrizia Burra; Giorgio E Gerunda; Umberto Cillo; Pietro Andreone; Mauro Bernardi
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 5.828

3.  A 10-Year united network for organ sharing review of mortality and risk factors in young children awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel H Leung; Amrita Narang; Charles G Minard; Girish Hiremath; John A Goss; Ross Shepherd
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Modified pediatric end-stage liver disease scoring system and pediatric liver transplantation in Brazil.

Authors:  Joao Seda Neto; Eduardo Carone; Renata P S Pugliese; Eduardo A Fonseca; Gilda Porta; Irene Miura; Vera B Danesi; Teresa C Guimaraes; Andre L Godoy; Adriana Porta; Rodrigo Vincenzi; Francisco Carnevale; Mario Kondo; Paulo Chapchap
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  National and regional analysis of exceptions to the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scoring system (2003-2004).

Authors:  Benjamin L Shneider; Frederick J Suchy; Sukru Emre
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Predictors of clinical outcome in children undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for acute and chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Chris Rhee; Kiran Narsinh; Robert S Venick; Ricardo A Molina; Visal Nga; Rita Engelhardt; Martín G Martín
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Primary biliary cirrhosis has high wait-list mortality among patients listed for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ashwani K Singal; Xiao Fang; Mohamed Kaif; Mohsen Hasanin; Brendan M Mcguire; Yong-Fang Kuo; Russell H Wiesner
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Organ allocation for liver-intestine candidates.

Authors:  Simon Horslen
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sue V McDiarmid; Ravinder Anand; Anne S Lindblad
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Nonstandard Exception Requests Impact Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  H J Braun; E R Perito; J L Dodge; S Rhee; J P Roberts
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  13 in total

1.  Functional status at listing predicts waitlist and posttransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Save the Children: The Ethical Argument for Preferential Priority to Minors in Deceased Donor Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Evelyn Hsu; Emily R Perito; George Mazariegos
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01

3.  Impact of Acuity Circles on Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Douglas Mogul; Emily R Perito; Nicholas Wood; George V Mazariegos; Douglas VanDerwerken; Samar H Ibrahim; Saeed Mohammad; Pamela L Valentino; Sommer Gentry; Evelyn Hsu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Primary Liver Transplantation vs. Transplant after Kasai Portoenterostomy for Infants with Biliary Atresia.

Authors:  Caroline P Lemoine; John P LeShock; Katherine A Brandt; Riccardo Superina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Impact of the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) growth failure thresholds on mortality among pediatric liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Sonja M Swenson; John P Roberts; Sue Rhee; Emily R Perito
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Is the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score Truly a Detriment to Pediatric Liver Allocation?

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Melissa M Gadsden; David S Goldberg
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Random forest analysis identifies change in serum creatinine and listing status as the most predictive variables of an outcome for young children on liver transplant waitlist.

Authors:  Sakil Kulkarni; Lisa Chi; Charles Goss; Qinghua Lian; Michelle Nadler; Janis Stoll; Maria Doyle; Yumirle Turmelle; Adeel Khan
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 8.  Advances in management of end stage liver disease in children.

Authors:  Aradhana Aneja; Elizabeth Scott; Rohit Kohli
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-03-25

9.  Health-related quality of life after anonymous nondirected living liver donation: A multicenter collaboration.

Authors:  Muhammad H Raza; Whitney E Jackson; Angela Dell; Li Ding; James Shapiro; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Yuri Genyk; Linda Sher; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Outcomes following liver transplantation in young infants: Data from the SPLIT registry.

Authors:  Ajay K Jain; Ravinder Anand; Stacee Lerret; George Yanni; Jia-Yuh Chen; Saeed Mohammad; Majella Doyle; Greg Telega; Simon Horslen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.