Literature DB >> 12151728

Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation.

Sue V McDiarmid1, Ravinder Anand, Anne S Lindblad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score for children with chronic liver disease using easily obtainable, objective, verifiable parameters, would be useful to prioritize children awaiting liver transplantation.
METHODS: Data from the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT), a consortium of 29 U.S. and Canadian centers, were used to develop the PELD score. Two pretransplantation endpoints were evaluated: (1) death, n=884; and (2) death or moving to the intensive care unit (ICU), n=779. The analyses were restricted to children with chronic liver disease who were listed for a first transplant. Preliminary analyses of 17 possible factors yielded 6 parameters of interest: age <1 year, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, growth failure (height or weight Z score <-2), and calculated glomerular filtration rate. In a univariate Cox regression analysis, age, bilirubin, INR, and albumin were significant (P<0.01) predictors of both endpoints; glomerular filtration rate was not significant for either endpoint; and growth failure was significant for death/ICU but not death alone. In the multivariate analyses, age, bilirubin, and INR were significant for the death endpoint; and bilirubin, INR, growth failure, and albumin were significant for the death/ICU endpoint. From these results, three PELD models were evaluated to predict both outcomes at 3 and 6 months: PELD 1 (age, bilirubin, INR); PELD 2 (bilirubin, INR, albumin, growth failure); and PELD 3 (bilirubin, INR, albumin, growth failure, and age). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) was used to compare models. For PELD 3, the most inclusive model, the AUC ROC at 3 months was 0.92 for death and 0.82 for "death-moved to ICU." A comparison of the AUC ROCs for the other models and for the model of end-stage liver disease ([MELD], the adult end-stage liver disease severity score model), none of which performed better than PELD 3, are presented.
CONCLUSION: A model using five objective parameters can accurately predict death or death-moved to ICU in children awaiting liver transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12151728     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200207270-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  51 in total

1.  Hepatocellular telomere length in biliary atresia measured by Q-FISH.

Authors:  Yukihiro Sanada; Junko Aida; Youichi Kawano; Ken-ichi Nakamura; Naotaka Shimomura; Naoshi Ishikawa; Tomio Arai; Steven S S Poon; Naoya Yamada; Noriki Okada; Taiichi Wakiya; Makoto Hayashida; Takeshi Saito; Satoshi Egami; Shuji Hishikawa; Yoshiyuki Ihara; Taizen Urahashi; Koichi Mizuta; Yoshikazu Yasuda; Hideo Kawarasaki; Kaiyo Takubo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation.

Authors:  David Thompson; Larry Waisanen; Robert Wolfe; Robert M Merion; Keith McCullough; Ann Rodgers
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11

3.  Does the pediatric end-stage liver disease score or hepatic artery resistance index predict outcome after liver transplantation for biliary atresia?

Authors:  Sonal Asthana; Patricia McClean; Mark D Stringer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Development of a survival evaluation model for liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to hepatitis B.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Bo Li; Lu-Nan Yan; Fei Yin; Tian-Fu Wen; Yong Zeng; Ji-Chun Zhao; Yu-Kui Ma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Platelet count, spleen length, and platelet count-to-spleen length ratio for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Juan Cristóbal Gana; Jason Yap; Thomasin Adams-Webber; Natalie Rashkovan; Simon C Ling; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  Expansion of the Liver Donor Supply Through Greater Use of Split-Liver Transplantation: Identifying Optimal Recipients.

Authors:  Douglas B Mogul; Xun Luo; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Mary G Bowring; Allan B Massie; Kathleen B Schwarz; Andrew M Cameron; John F P Bridges; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Impact of the Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) growth failure thresholds on mortality among pediatric liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Sonja M Swenson; John P Roberts; Sue Rhee; Emily R Perito
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The efficacy of measurement of the serum beta-D glucan in the patients with biliary atresia.

Authors:  Yukihiro Sanada; Koichi Mizuta; Taizen Urahashi; Yoshiyuki Ihara; Taiichi Wakiya; Noriki Okada; Naoya Yamada; Yoshikazu Yasuda; Hideo Kawarasaki
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States.

Authors:  J M Smith; S W Biggins; D G Haselby; W R Kim; J Wedd; K Lamb; B Thompson; D L Segev; S Gustafson; R Kandaswamy; P G Stock; A J Matas; C J Samana; E F Sleeman; D Stewart; A Harper; E Edwards; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.

Authors:  Michael L Schilsky; Maryam Moini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.