Literature DB >> 20213836

Modified pediatric end-stage liver disease scoring system and pediatric liver transplantation in Brazil.

Joao Seda Neto1, Eduardo Carone, Renata P S Pugliese, Eduardo A Fonseca, Gilda Porta, Irene Miura, Vera B Danesi, Teresa C Guimaraes, Andre L Godoy, Adriana Porta, Rodrigo Vincenzi, Francisco Carnevale, Mario Kondo, Paulo Chapchap.   

Abstract

The Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) scoring system is a formula developed to provide a continuous numerical assessment of the risk of death in order to allocate livers to children in need of transplantation. The PELD scoring system was introduced in Brazil in July 2006. An important change was made in the system: the final number for listing patients less than 12 years old for transplantation was the calculated PELD score multiplied by 3. The consequences of this allocation policy were analyzed in 2 ways in this research: nationally and in the state of São Paulo (SP State). In the analysis of the national data, a comparison of the pre-PELD era (July 2003 to July 2006) and the post-PELD era (August 2006 to April 2009) showed that the total number of pediatric transplants for children under 12 years of age decreased 7%. Regionally, in SP State, there was a 62% increase in the number of deceased donor liver transplantation procedures for the pediatric population after the introduction of the modified PELD system. There was also a 6.1-fold increase in split liver transplantation as well as a statistically significant decrease in the time on the waiting list (P < 0.001). In conclusion, changing the allocation policy in Brazil in order to benefit pediatric patients on the waiting list had different results according to analyses of national and regional data. A significant increase in deceased donor liver transplantation/split liver transplantation and a shorter time on the waiting list were observed in SP State. The modified PELD scoring system is simple and optimizes the utilization of deceased donor liver grafts in centers performing pediatric transplants. (c) 2010 AASLD

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213836     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.

Authors:  Evelyn K Hsu; Michele L Shaffer; Lucy Gao; Christopher Sonnenday; Michael L Volk; John Bucuvalas; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Save the Children: The Ethical Argument for Preferential Priority to Minors in Deceased Donor Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Evelyn Hsu; Emily R Perito; George Mazariegos
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01

3.  Successful domino liver transplantation in maple syrup urine disease using a related living donor.

Authors:  F H Feier; I K Miura; E A Fonseca; G Porta; R Pugliese; A Porta; I V D Schwartz; A V B Margutti; J S Camelo; S N Yamaguchi; A T Taveira; H Candido; M Benavides; V Danesi; T Guimaraes; M Kondo; P Chapchap; J Seda Neto
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  Accuracy of the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score in Estimating Pretransplant Mortality Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Chung-Chou H Chang; Cindy L Bryce; Benjamin L Shneider; Jonathan G Yabes; Yi Ren; Gabriel L Zenarosa; Heather Tomko; Drew M Donnell; Robert H Squires; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 5.  Global lessons in graft type and pediatric liver allocation: A path toward improving outcomes and eliminating wait-list mortality.

Authors:  Evelyn K Hsu; George V Mazariegos
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.799

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.