| Literature DB >> 30241354 |
Cheng Chen1, Yang Miao2, Kimmy De Winter3, Hua-Jing Wang4, Patrick Demeyere5, Ye Yuan6, Francis Verpoort7,8,9,10.
Abstract
Transition-metal-catalyzed amide-bond formation from alcohols and amines is an atom-economic and eco-friendly route. Herein, we identified a highly active in situ N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)/ruthenium (Ru) catalytic system for this amide synthesis. Various substrates, including sterically hindered ones, could be directly transformed into the corresponding amides with the catalyst loading as low as 0.25 mol.%. In this system, we replaced the p-cymene ligand of the Ru source with a relatively labile cyclooctadiene (cod) ligand so as to more efficiently obtain the corresponding poly-carbene Ru species. Expectedly, the weaker cod ligand could be more easily substituted with multiple mono-NHC ligands. Further high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses revealed that two tetra-carbene complexes were probably generated from the in situ catalytic system.Entities:
Keywords: N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs); amide bonds; homogeneous catalysis; in situ; ruthenium (Ru); synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30241354 PMCID: PMC6222456 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The design strategy of this work.
Optimization of reaction conditions with a catalyst loading of 0.5 mol.% .
| Entry | L | x | y | n | Yields (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | 4a | Unreacted 1a | |||||
| 1 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 62 | 15 | 18 |
| 2 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 28 | 30 | 39 |
| 3 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 63 | 15 | 16 |
| 4 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 78 | 10 | 8 |
| 5 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 72 | 12 | 8 |
| 6 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.5 | 28 | 30 | 39 |
| 7 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 0.0 | 57 | 10 | 31 |
| 8 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 1.0 | 79 | 6 | 8 |
| 9 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 1.5 | 81 | 5 | 7 |
| 10 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 2.0 | 83 | 4 | 5 |
| 11 |
| 2.00 | 3.50 | 2.5 | 82 | 4 | 6 |
| 12 |
| 0.00 | 1.50 | 2.0 | 0 | 19 | 76 |
| 13 |
| 0.50 | 2.00 | 2.0 | 37 | 10 | 51 |
| 14 |
| 1.00 | 2.50 | 2.0 | 60 | 11 | 28 |
| 15 |
| 1.50 | 3.00 | 2.0 | 75 | 7 | 16 |
| 16 |
| 2.50 | 4.00 | 2.0 | 86 | 4 | 9 |
| 17 |
| 3.00 | 4.50 | 2.0 | 81 | 6 | 3 |
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a (2.50 mmol), 2a (2.75 mmol), [RuCl2(cod)]n (0.50 mol.%), L (x mol.%), NaH (y mol.%), toluene (1.25 mL), 120 °C, n h of catalyst generation time, and 16 h of reaction time; NMR yields (average of two consistent runs) using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard; 36 h of reaction time.
Optimization of reaction conditions with a catalyst loading of 0.25 mol.% .
| Entry | Base | x | y | Yields (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | 4a | Unreacted 1a | ||||
| 1 | NaH | 2.00 | 1.50 | 65 | 7 | 24 |
| 2 | KHMDS | 2.00 | 1.50 | 27 | 11 | 57 |
| 3 | KO | 2.00 | 1.50 | 45 | 15 | 32 |
| 4 | Cs2CO3 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 86 | 7 | 5 |
| 5 | Cs2CO3 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 57 | 18 | 22 |
| 6 | Cs2CO3 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 71 | 13 | 12 |
| 7 | Cs2CO3 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 69 | 16 | 13 |
| 8 | Cs2CO3 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 45 | 38 | 15 |
| 9 | Cs2CO3 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 66 | 15 | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 | Cs2CO3 | 2.25 | 1.50 | 81 | 10 | 8 |
| 12 | Cs2CO3 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 72 | 12 | 15 |
1a (5.00 mmol), 2a (5.50 mmol), [RuCl2(cod)]n (0.25 mol.%), L4 (1.25 mol.%), base (x mol.%), toluene (y mL), 120 °C, 2 h of catalyst generation time, and 36 h of reaction time; NMR yields (average of two consistent runs) using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.
Figure 2Amide synthesis from various alcohols and amines; isolated yields (averages of two consistent runs); in m-xylene at reflux; 0.5 mol.% of [Ru].
Figure 3The high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses for the identification of the possible Ru species.