Leeya F Pinder1, Ronda Henry-Tillman1, David Linyama1, Victor Kusweje1, Jean-Baptiste Nzayisenga1, Aaron Shibemba1, Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe1, Kennedy Lishimpi1, Mulindi Mwanahamuntu1, Michael Hicks1, Groesbeck P Parham1. 1. Leeva F. Pinder, David Linyama, Jean-Baptiste Nzayisenga, Aaron Shibemba, Mulindi Mwanahamuntu, and Groesbeck P. Parham, University of Zambia School of Medicine; Kennedy Lishimpi, Cancer Diseases Hospital, Lusaka; Victor Kusweje, Kabwe General Hospital, Kabwe, Zambia; Leeya F. Pinder, Michael Hicks, and Groesbeck P. Parham, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Ronda Henry-Tillman, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; and Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In 2005, the Cervical Cancer Prevention Program in Zambia (CCPPZ) was implemented and has since provided cervical cancer screen-and-treat services to more than 500,000 women. By leveraging the successes and experiences of the CCPPZ, we intended to build capacity for the early detection and surgical treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Our initiative sought to build capacity for breast cancer care through the (1) formation of a breast cancer advocacy alliance to raise awareness, (2) creation of resource-appropriate breast cancer care training curricula for mid- and high-level providers, and (3) implementation of early detection and treatment capacity within two major health care facilities. RESULTS: Six months after the completion of the initiative, the following outcomes were documented: Breast health education and clinical breast examination (CBE) services were successfully integrated into the service platforms of four CCPPZ clinics. Two new breast diagnostic centers were opened, which provided access to breast ultrasound, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, and needle aspiration. Breast health education and CBE were provided to 1,955 clients, 167 of whom were evaluated at the two diagnostic centers; 55 of those evaluated underwent core-needle biopsy, of which 17 were diagnosed with invasive cancer. Newly trained surgeons performed six sentinel lymph node mappings, eight sentinel lymph node dissections, and 10 breast conservation surgeries (lumpectomies). CONCLUSION: This initiative successfully established clinical services in Zambia that are critical for the early detection and surgical management of breast cancer.
PURPOSE: In 2005, the Cervical Cancer Prevention Program in Zambia (CCPPZ) was implemented and has since provided cervical cancer screen-and-treat services to more than 500,000 women. By leveraging the successes and experiences of the CCPPZ, we intended to build capacity for the early detection and surgical treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Our initiative sought to build capacity for breast cancer care through the (1) formation of a breast cancer advocacy alliance to raise awareness, (2) creation of resource-appropriate breast cancer care training curricula for mid- and high-level providers, and (3) implementation of early detection and treatment capacity within two major health care facilities. RESULTS: Six months after the completion of the initiative, the following outcomes were documented: Breast health education and clinical breast examination (CBE) services were successfully integrated into the service platforms of four CCPPZ clinics. Two new breast diagnostic centers were opened, which provided access to breast ultrasound, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, and needle aspiration. Breast health education and CBE were provided to 1,955 clients, 167 of whom were evaluated at the two diagnostic centers; 55 of those evaluated underwent core-needle biopsy, of which 17 were diagnosed with invasive cancer. Newly trained surgeons performed six sentinel lymph node mappings, eight sentinel lymph node dissections, and 10 breast conservation surgeries (lumpectomies). CONCLUSION: This initiative successfully established clinical services in Zambia that are critical for the early detection and surgical management of breast cancer.
Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa is characterized by low but rapidly increasing
disease incidence,[1,2] late-stage presentation, high mortality, and a heavy
burden among younger women.[3,4] Increasing longevity and the
replacement of traditional African lifestyles with Western patterns of food
consumption, childbearing, and breastfeeding undergird the increase in disease
incidence.[2] Much of the
late-stage presentation and high mortality rates can be attributed to system-level
barriers to early detection and treatment.[5] Other contributing factors include lack of awareness of
early signs and symptoms of the disease[6,7]; a general belief
that cancer has a supernatural origin and is always fatal[8]; use of traditional therapies before or in lieu of
seeking modern treatment[9-11]; and fear of spousal abandonment
after mastectomy.[12] The need for a
high-impact, scalable, breast cancer control model that has the inherent capability
to adjust to the myriad of complex situations and circumstances that women in
low-resource environments have to negotiate is paramount. In this paper, we describe
experiences and initial results of a public-private demonstration project to expand
access to breast cancer control services in Zambia. It was built on the framework of
a decade-long program that successfully integrated cervical cancer prevention
interventions within service platforms used to deliver HIV/AIDS care and treatment
in Zambia.
METHODS
Since 2005, the Zambian government, with support from the US President’s
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which is funded through the US Centers for Disease
Control Prevention, and in partnership with local and US university-based public
health oncology experts and advocates, has facilitated the implementation of a
public-sector cervical cancer prevention intervention—Cervical Cancer
Prevention Program in Zambia (CCPPZ). Initially focused on the provision of cervical
cancer screening and treatment services to HIV-infectedwomen, it soon expanded
services to all women regardless of HIV status as a result of patient demand. During
the past decade, albeit with resources disproportionate to demand, cervical cancer
prevention services have been scaled nationally to 60 government-operated public
health clinics, at which more than 500,000 women have been screened since program
inception and 50,000 are screened annually. An analysis of the first 100,000 women
enrolled in the program revealed a screen-to-detection ratio of 56 to 1 for
high-grade cervical precancer, an overall treatment rate of 70% for women diagnosed
with precancerous lesions, and a shift in the percentage of early-stage invasive
cervical cancers from 20% to 42%.[13] As of February 2015, CCPPZ was officially integrated into the
government’s public health system with an official desk—National
Coordinator of Cancer Prevention—now located at the Zambian Ministry
Health.Our major objectives were to leverage the successes and experiences of
Zambia’s cervical cancer prevention program and to use direct participation
at the point of care to build capacity for detection and surgical treatment of
breast cancer in Zambia. We also assessed the clinical advancements that resulted
from the capacity-building activities. The following cluster of activities were
conducted to implement the initiative:Creation of an alliance of advocacy groups: With support from the Susan G.
Komen Foundation, the first step was to facilitate the formation of an
alliance of the five existing breast and cervical cancer advocacy groups in
Zambia into a consortium—CAPRAZ (Cancer Prevention Alliance
Zambia)—with the following goals (1) intensify breast and cervical
cancer awareness campaigns in the community to dispel myths and
misconceptions surrounding the disease and its treatment; (2) ensure that
breast and cervical cancer health promotion messages were evidence based and
contextually relevant, and (3) coordinate and provide technical support for
awareness activities of member groups.Assess capacity: After the organization of CAPRAZ into a functional nonprofit
organization, the next step was to assess breast cancer early detection and
diagnostic and surgical treatment capacities. Toward this end, breast
oncology consultants from two university medical centers in the United
States (University of Arkansas and University of North Carolina, Chapel
Hill) were invited to Zambia to assess breast cancer care capacity at the
University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka Province (the country’s single
tertiary medical facility that serves as its primary center for postgraduate
medical training) and Kabwe General Hospital in Central Province (a large,
rural provincial medical center representative of the types of health
facilities that have been prioritized by the Zambian National Cancer Control
Strategic Plan as high-priority sites for the expansion of cancer control
services). Upon receipt of approval from relevant government agencies, the
consultants visited the two designated sites and worked daily alongside
local health professionals in their breast clinics, surgical theaters, and
postoperative wards. They also attended hospital-based educational
conferences, convened meetings with key academic stakeholders and
professional health care providers, gave formal lectures on breast cancer
diagnosis and management to faculty and staff, and hosted informal social
gatherings. From the assessment, it was determined that the largest and most
critical deficits in the breast cancer care pathway at the two facilities
were lack of capacity to perform the following: (1) clinical breast
examination (CBEs), (2) breast ultrasound, (3) ultrasound-guided core needle
biopsy of palpable breast masses, and (4) conservative surgical treatment of
breast cancer. Other weaknesses and strengths are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Breast Cancer Early Detection and Surgical Capacity Assessment
Curriculum development: The team of US consultants, in partnership with
Zambian health care professionals, used information from the assessment and
knowledge of the local context to develop a training curriculum aimed at
building capacity in these four areas. Once developed, the curriculum was
vetted by senior members of the Zambian Ministry of Health’s
Technical Working Group for purposes of modification and approval.Implementation of the curriculum: Four months after their initial visit, the
US oncology consultants returned to Zambia and implemented the training
curriculum (Table 2), in the form of
a 1-week long practicum at the University Teaching Hospital, entitled
“A Model for Expansion of Breast Cancer Care in Zambia.”
Training consisted of a combination of didactics and hands-on mentoring and
evaluation by US in the breast clinics and surgical theaters at the
University Teaching Hospital and Kabwe General Hospital.
Table 2
Breast Cancer Training Curriculum
Development of benchmarks for evaluation: The following benchmarks were
established for impact evaluation of the initiative:(1) Cervical cancer screening nurses working in government-operated
primary health centers could adequately deliver breast health
awareness education and CBE.(2) Local radiographers (technicians) could accurately perform
ultrasonographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.(3) General surgeons could safely and effectively perform
ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy and needle aspiration of breast
masses, axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with blue dye,
SLN dissection, and breast lumpectomy.(4) Breast diagnostic centers would be established at each of the two
facilities described as assessment sites, with the capacity to
perform CBE, breast ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided core needle
biopsy of palpable breast masses.(5) Data collection platforms would be established in each
clinic.(6) Referral pathways would be developed between the breast
diagnostic clinics and either the departments of general surgery at
the respective hospitals or the national cancer center (Cancer
Diseases Hospital) in Lusaka; referral pathways also would be
developed for chemotherapy and radiation at the national cancer
center in Lusaka.(7) Educational activities implemented by CAPRAZ in the catchment
areas surrounding the two hospitals would increase awareness of the
signs and symptoms of breast cancer and encourage women with breast
concerns to seek care from local health facilities. Member groups
also would begin to increase their participation in local breast
cancer initiatives, such as fundraisers, educational seminars,
public lectures, and awareness campaigns.Breast Cancer Early Detection and Surgical Capacity AssessmentBreast Cancer Training Curriculum
RESULTS
A 6-month evaluation of local activities by US consultants revealed the
following:Four cervical cancer screening clinics at the primary health care
level—one in Kabwe and three in Lusaka provinces—had
successfully integrated breast cancer education and CBE into their routine
service platforms.Two new breast cancer diagnostic centers were operational—one at Kabwe
General Hospital and the other at University Teaching Hospital, and each
provided CBE, breast ultrasound, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, and
needle aspiration.A total of 1,955 women had undergone CBE in the four primary health centers,
of which 256 (13.1%) had palpable breast masses (Table 3). All were referred to one of the two new breast
diagnostic centers for additional evaluation; of these, 167 (65.2%) actually
attended. A secondary CBE at the referral centers confirmed palpable breast
masses in 59 (35.3%) of those who underwent the examination (Table 3).
Table 3
Breast Evaluation
Ultrasound-guided biopsies were indicated and performed in 55 of the 59 women
who had confirmed palpable breast masses (Table 3). Pathology results were available for 45 (81.8%) of the
55 who underwent biopsy (Fig 1). Breast
cancer was confirmed in 17 (37.8%), and benign breast lesions in 24 (43.6%).
The remaining four pathology results were classified as either normal or
inadequate for diagnosis. The median (± standard deviation) age of
women diagnosed with breast cancer was 40 years (± 13.4 years). The
median diameter of breast cancer masses detected by ultrasound was 2.9 cm.
Fibroadenoma (n = 10) was the most commonly reported benign lesion (Table 4).
Fig 1
Breast biopsy results (N = 55).
Table 4
Breast Biopsy Results
Six SLN mappings, eight SLN dissections, and 20 breast conservation surgeries
(lumpectomies) were performed independently by the Zambian general surgeons.
The histologic margin status of lumpectomy surgical specimens was not
reported. No surgical complications were reported (Table 5).
Table 5
Breast Cancer Surgery
Breast EvaluationBreast biopsy results (N = 55).Breast Biopsy ResultsBreast Cancer Surgery
DISCUSSION
Breast cancer is projected to increase in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
during the next two decades. The vast majority of women who live in these settings
will die from their disease primarily because of the advanced stage at which they
are diagnosed and lack of access to high-quality treatment services. In addition,
attempts to develop effective breast cancer care service platforms in such settings
are made difficult by widespread myths and misconceptions about the disease as well
as by competing health care priorities. We took advantage of prior investments in
the integration of cervical cancer screening within HIV services to launch an
approach to capacity building for the early detection and surgical treatment of
breast cancer in Zambia.Cervical cancer screening nurses were trained to provide breast cancer education and
perform CBE on appropriately aged asymptomatic and symptomatic women who attended
their clinics for cervical cancer prevention services. Although the most effective
means for screening is mammography,[14] population-based mammographic screening requires resources
generally not widely available in LMICs. In addition, its benefit-to-harm ratio has
been questioned recently, particularly in women younger than 50 years old—the
age group that produces the majority of breast cancers in LMICs.[3,15] Although there is controversy about the benefits of
CBE,[16-19] there is developing evidence that it has the
potential to downstage disease. In an ongoing cluster-randomized trial in India,
CBE, when performed by community health care workers, detected more (18.8
v 8.1 per 100,000 women) early-stage cancers (stage I to IIA)
in intervention versus control villages.[20]Two new diagnostic breast centers were established and staffed with radiographers and
general surgeons who were trained in ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy,
respectively. Ultrasound is recommended as an appropriate tool for the evaluation of
women with palpable breast masses in LMICs, given its relatively low cost compared
with other imaging technologies, value as an adjunct to CBE, and ability to support
minimally invasive diagnostic procedures.[21,22] Ultrasound,
however, is dependent on the quality and reliability of the equipment and the
experience of operators for accuracy in the diagnosis of breast lesions.[23] When used effectively, it can
distinguish simple cysts from solid masses, provide an estimation of the likelihood
of malignancy, and be used to aid in biopsy for pathologic diagnosis.[24]Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies are performed to determine the etiology of
palpable breast masses and are indicated on the basis of the sonographic
characteristics of the mass, such as shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern,
posterior acoustics, and boundary.[25] Compared with open incisional and excisional biopsy,
core-needle biopsy is less invasive, less expensive, causes minimal scarring, and
can be performed on an outpatient basis.[26] Core-needle biopsy also has the benefit of provision of
adequate tissue for determination of histologic grade; vascular and lymphatic
invasion; estrogen and progesterone receptor statuses; and the presence of molecular
tumor markers, such as HER2/neu.[27] These prognostic variables may
help triage surgical interventions, such as breast-conservation therapy,[28] use of SLN biopsy, or axillary
lymph node dissection.[27]Surgery is the cornerstone of breast cancer care and is the most widely available
therapy for breast cancer in LMICs. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is the most
commonly performed surgical procedure for breast cancer in these settings, largely
as a result of late-stage presentation of disease. Although general surgeons in
Zambia were well versed in performance of MRMs, their exposure to breast
conservation surgery (lumpectomy) and axillary SLN mapping and dissection techniques
was limited. The number of surgical theaters was inadequate, and not enough time was
allocated to accommodate all of the surgical cases that had been scheduled for
surgical demonstrations by visiting oncologists, which resulted in a
less-than-desired number for hands-on training. This ultimately limited the training
the surgeons received in conservative surgery techniques. Because such a large
percentage of women presented with advanced-stage disease, limited numbers of
early-stage breast cancer cases were available on which to demonstrate breast
lumpectomy and SLN mapping/dissection. Despite these challenges, the surgeons were
able to independently perform breast conservation surgery and SLN mapping and
dissection techniques. Breast conservation surgery for early-stage disease is safe
and has the same overall survival as mastectomy.[29] It has the added benefit of better cosmetic appearance,
which is important, given the impact of cultural beliefs and stigma on
treatment-seeking behavior.[12,30] MRMs, however, will remain the
mainstay of treatment of breast cancer in LMICs for the foreseeable future given the
limitations imposed by the lack of radiotherapy services and inefficient resources
for effective follow-up programs.[31] Complete level-1 and -2 axillary dissections typically are
performed during breast cancer surgeries in LMICs because of advanced-stage disease
or the inability to perform less invasive axillary staging in early-stage disease.
With proper training, however, SLN mapping and sampling can be performed, which may
increase the accuracy of axillary staging in breast cancer and reduce morbidity
associated with complete axillary dissections.[32] This will become a necessary skill as more cancers are
diagnosed at an early stage.We used direct participation at the point of care to inform the construction and
implementation of an approach to capacity building for the early detection and
surgical treatment of breast cancer in Zambia (Table
6). As an overall impact, CBEs and breast education are now performed by
cervical cancer screening nurses at select cervical cancer prevention clinics in
Zambia. Two new diagnostic breast centers have been established that provide modern
diagnostic services in the form of breast ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsies.
Efforts are underway to make them sustainable by using resources provided through
local public-private partnerships. General surgeons at two of the country’s
largest health facilities are now aware of how to perform breast-conserving surgery,
including lumpectomy and axillary SLN mapping/dissection for early-stage disease.
Two general surgeons are undergoing 6 months of additional hands-on training under
the tutelage of breast cancer surgeons in South Africa, through a south-south
educational collaboration sponsored by the Susan G. Komen Foundation and the Zambian
Ministry of Health. A third has been accepted into a formal surgical oncology
fellowship in India. Active participation in local clinics and surgical theaters by
the US oncology experts provided them with unique insights into the challenges of
breast cancer control in Zambia and will serve to shape future surgical training
collaborative efforts.
Table 6
Project Impact
Project ImpactFuture initiatives will concentrate on the expansion of breast cancer early detection
and surgical treatment services throughout the country. This will require increased
training of nurses, radiographers, and surgeons as well as an effective system to
monitor quality, access timely and accurate pathology services, and obtain patient
follow-up information. As awareness is increased and CBE is more widely implemented,
early-stage presentation will become more prevalent and the demand for breast
conservation surgical skills, as well as those for breast reconstruction, will
increase.In conclusion, system-level barriers to early detection and treatment of cancer
continue to plague LMICs. We leveraged an existing cervical cancer prevention
platform to introduce breast cancer education, detection, and surgical treatment
services by investing in the development of local clinical expertise. Overall, this
initiative has increased breast care capacity in Zambia and, if properly scaled, can
serve to improve the diagnosis and management of early-stage breast cancer at a
national level, which thereby reducing breast cancer morbidity and mortality.
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Olusegun I Alatise; Verna Vanderpuye; Corey Casper; Francis A Abantanga; Thaim B Kamara; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Muhammad Habeebu; Fatimah B Abdulkareem; Lynette Denny Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Groesbeck P Parham; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu; Sharon Kapambwe; Richard Muwonge; Allen C Bateman; Meridith Blevins; Carla J Chibwesha; Krista S Pfaendler; Victor Mudenda; Aaron L Shibemba; Samson Chisele; Gracilia Mkumba; Bellington Vwalika; Michael L Hicks; Sten H Vermund; Benjamin H Chi; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susan Horton; Rolando Camacho Rodriguez; Benjamin O Anderson; Soe Aung; Baffour Awuah; Lucia Delgado Pebé; Catherine Duggan; Allison Dvaladze; Somesh Kumar; Raúl Murillo; Rai Mra; Anne F Rositch; Mutumba Songiso; Richard Sullivan; Audrey T Tsunoda; Soo-Hwang Teo; Hellen Gelband Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lydia E Pace; Jean Marie Vianney Dusengimana; Lawrence N Shulman; Lauren E Schleimer; Cyprien Shyirambere; Christian Rusangwa; Gaspard Muvugabigwi; Paul H Park; ChuanChin Huang; Jean Bosco Bigirimana; Vedaste Hategekimana; Vestine Rugema; Aline Umwizerwa; Nancy L Keating; Tharcisse Mpunga Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2019-11