Joshua D Rosenblat1, Gregory E Simon2, Gary S Sachs3, Ingrid Deetz3, Allen Doederlein3, Denisse DePeralta3, Mary Mischka Dean3, Roger S McIntyre4. 1. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA), Chicago, IL, United States; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. 3. Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA), Chicago, IL, United States. 4. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA), Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: roger.mcintyre@uhn.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-reported determinants of treatment effectiveness and tolerability amongst persons with major depressive or bipolar disorders. METHODS: The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) conducted an online survey February 2016-April 2016 asking participants about which outcomes are most important in determining subjective treatment effectiveness and tolerability. RESULTS: In total, 896 participants completed the survey [49.9% unipolar depression (n = 447) and 50.1% bipolar depression (n = 449)]. Survey respondents reported several previous medication trials with the minority (25% of depression and 29% of bipolar group) of respondents reporting that their current treatment plan was completely effective. When asked how they know that the treatment is working, for both groups, the highest rated response was, "I don't feel overly anxious, agitated or irritable." Weight gain was the adverse effect that most commonly led respondents to discontinue a medication. Lethargy, emotional blunting, shaking/trembling and anxiety were also identified as common treatment-emergent experiences leading to medication discontinuation in greater than one-third of respondents. The bipolar group more frequently identified several signs that suggested treatment was working (e.g., improved neurocognitive function, improved sleep), as well as more frequently reported several reasons to discontinue medications (e.g., weight gain, trembling). CONCLUSION: Numerous factors emerged as important to patients when evaluating treatment effectiveness and tolerability. Some of these factors are inadequately assessed by current standard clinical trial outcome measures. Considering these important patient-centred outcomes in future clinical trials, treatment guidelines and direct patient care may serve to improve patient satisfaction, quality of life and the therapeutic alliance.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-reported determinants of treatment effectiveness and tolerability amongst persons with major depressive or bipolar disorders. METHODS: The Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) conducted an online survey February 2016-April 2016 asking participants about which outcomes are most important in determining subjective treatment effectiveness and tolerability. RESULTS: In total, 896 participants completed the survey [49.9% unipolar depression (n = 447) and 50.1% bipolar depression (n = 449)]. Survey respondents reported several previous medication trials with the minority (25% of depression and 29% of bipolar group) of respondents reporting that their current treatment plan was completely effective. When asked how they know that the treatment is working, for both groups, the highest rated response was, "I don't feel overly anxious, agitated or irritable." Weight gain was the adverse effect that most commonly led respondents to discontinue a medication. Lethargy, emotional blunting, shaking/trembling and anxiety were also identified as common treatment-emergent experiences leading to medication discontinuation in greater than one-third of respondents. The bipolar group more frequently identified several signs that suggested treatment was working (e.g., improved neurocognitive function, improved sleep), as well as more frequently reported several reasons to discontinue medications (e.g., weight gain, trembling). CONCLUSION: Numerous factors emerged as important to patients when evaluating treatment effectiveness and tolerability. Some of these factors are inadequately assessed by current standard clinical trial outcome measures. Considering these important patient-centred outcomes in future clinical trials, treatment guidelines and direct patient care may serve to improve patient satisfaction, quality of life and the therapeutic alliance.
Authors: Vicki C Fung; Lindsay N Overhage; Louisa G Sylvia; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Masoud Kamali; Keming Gao; Richard C Shelton; Terence A Ketter; William V Bobo; Michael E Thase; Joseph R Calabrese; Mauricio Tohen; Thilo Deckersbach; Andrew A Nierenberg Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Emma Morton; Erin E Michalak; Anthony Levitt; Robert D Levitan; Amy Cheung; Rachel Morehouse; Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Lakshmi N Yatham; Edwin M Tam; Raymond W Lam Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Meredith G Harris; Alan E Kazdin; Wai Tat Chiu; Nancy A Sampson; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Jordi Alonso; Yasmin Altwaijri; Laura Helena Andrade; Graça Cardoso; Alfredo Cía; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Georges Karam; Zeina Mneimneh; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Bibilola D Oladeji; Siobhan O'Neill; Kate Scott; Tim Slade; Yolanda Torres; Daniel Vigo; Bogdan Wojtyniak; Zahari Zarkov; Yuval Ziv; Ronald C Kessler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Roger S McIntyre; Martin Alda; Ross J Baldessarini; Michael Bauer; Michael Berk; Christoph U Correll; Andrea Fagiolini; Kostas Fountoulakis; Mark A Frye; Heinz Grunze; Lars V Kessing; David J Miklowitz; Gordon Parker; Robert M Post; Alan C Swann; Trisha Suppes; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Mario Maj Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Jose Ángel Alcalá; Andrés Fontalba-Navas; Miguel Company-Morales; Samuel L Romero-Guillena; Teófilo Gutiérrez-Higueras; Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Emma Morton; Venkat Bhat; Peter Giacobbe; Wendy Lou; Erin E Michalak; Shane McInerney; Trisha Chakrabarty; Benicio N Frey; Roumen V Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Susan Rotzinger; Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Andrew A Nierenberg; Meredith G Harris; Alan E Kazdin; Victor Puac-Polanco; Nancy Sampson; Daniel V Vigo; Wai Tat Chiu; Hannah N Ziobrowski; Jordi Alonso; Yasmin Altwaijri; Guilherme Borges; Brendan Bunting; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Josep Maria Haro; Chi-Yi Hu; Andrzej Kiejna; Sing Lee; John J McGrath; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; José Posada-Villa; Kate M Scott; Juan C Stagnaro; Maria C Viana; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-03-28 Impact factor: 5.345