Emma Morton1,2, Erin E Michalak1,3, Anthony Levitt4,5, Robert D Levitan4,6, Amy Cheung4,5, Rachel Morehouse7, Rajamannar Ramasubbu8, Lakshmi N Yatham1,3, Edwin M Tam1,3, Raymond W Lam1,3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria Australia. 3. Mood Disorders Centre, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Department of Psychiatry, 7938University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Mood Disorders Program, 71545Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Psychiatry, 3688Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. 8. Department of Psychiatry/Clinical Neurosciences, Mathison Center for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, 2129University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Bright light therapy is increasingly recommended (alone or in combination with antidepressant medication) to treat symptoms of nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about its impacts on quality of life (QoL), a holistic, patient-valued outcome. METHODS: This study utilizes secondary outcome data from an 8-week randomized, controlled, double blind trial comparing light monotherapy (n = 32), fluoxetine monotherapy (n = 30), and the combination of these (n = 27) to placebo (n = 30). QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Treatment-related differences in QoL improvements were assessed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. The influence of potential predictors of QoL (demographic variables and change in depressive symptoms) were investigated via hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS:Q-LES-Q-SF scores significantly improved across all treatment conditions; however, no significant differences were observed between treatment arms. QoL remained poor relative to community norms by the end of the trial period: Across conditions, 70.6% of participants had significantly impaired QoL at the 8-week assessment. Reduction in depressive scores was a significant predictor of improved QoL, with the final model accounting for 54% of variance in QoL change scores. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study emphasize that improvement in QoL and reduction in depressive symptoms in MDD, while related, cannot be taken to be synonymous. Adjunctive therapies may be required to address unmet QoL needs in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant or light therapies. Further research is required to explore additional predictors of QoL in order to better refine treatments for MDD.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Bright light therapy is increasingly recommended (alone or in combination with antidepressant medication) to treat symptoms of nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about its impacts on quality of life (QoL), a holistic, patient-valued outcome. METHODS: This study utilizes secondary outcome data from an 8-week randomized, controlled, double blind trial comparing light monotherapy (n = 32), fluoxetine monotherapy (n = 30), and the combination of these (n = 27) to placebo (n = 30). QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Treatment-related differences in QoL improvements were assessed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. The influence of potential predictors of QoL (demographic variables and change in depressive symptoms) were investigated via hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Q-LES-Q-SF scores significantly improved across all treatment conditions; however, no significant differences were observed between treatment arms. QoL remained poor relative to community norms by the end of the trial period: Across conditions, 70.6% of participants had significantly impaired QoL at the 8-week assessment. Reduction in depressive scores was a significant predictor of improved QoL, with the final model accounting for 54% of variance in QoL change scores. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study emphasize that improvement in QoL and reduction in depressive symptoms in MDD, while related, cannot be taken to be synonymous. Adjunctive therapies may be required to address unmet QoL needs in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant or light therapies. Further research is required to explore additional predictors of QoL in order to better refine treatments for MDD.
Entities:
Keywords:
antidepressants; depression; fluoxetine; light therapy; quality of life
Authors: Waguih William IsHak; Jared Matt Greenberg; Konstantin Balayan; Nina Kapitanski; Jessica Jeffrey; Hassan Fathy; Hala Fakhry; Mark Hyman Rapaport Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Robert N Golden; Bradley N Gaynes; R David Ekstrom; Robert M Hamer; Frederick M Jacobsen; Trisha Suppes; Katherine L Wisner; Charles B Nemeroff Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Joshua D Rosenblat; Gregory E Simon; Gary S Sachs; Ingrid Deetz; Allen Doederlein; Denisse DePeralta; Mary Mischka Dean; Roger S McIntyre Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Paul H Desan; Andrea J Weinstein; Erin E Michalak; Edwin M Tam; Ybe Meesters; Martine J Ruiter; Edward Horn; John Telner; Hani Iskandar; Diane B Boivin; Raymond W Lam Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-07 Impact factor: 3.630