Literature DB >> 30240342

Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.

Armand H Matheny Antommaria1,2, Kyle B Brothers3, John A Myers3, Yana B Feygin3, Sharon A Aufox4, Murray H Brilliant5, Pat Conway6, Stephanie M Fullerton7, Nanibaa' A Garrison8,9, Carol R Horowitz10, Gail P Jarvik11, Rongling Li12, Evette J Ludman13, Catherine A McCarty14, Jennifer B McCormick15, Nathaniel D Mercaldo16, Melanie F Myers2,17, Saskia C Sanderson18, Martha J Shrubsole19, Jonathan S Schildcrout20, Janet L Williams21, Maureen E Smith22, Ellen Wright Clayton23, Ingrid A Holm24,25.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The factors influencing parents' willingness to enroll their children in biobanks are poorly understood. This study sought to assess parents' willingness to enroll their children, and their perceived benefits, concerns, and information needs under different consent and data-sharing scenarios, and to identify factors associated with willingness.
METHODS: This large, experimental survey of patients at the 11 eMERGE Network sites used a disproportionate stratified sampling scheme to enrich the sample with historically underrepresented groups. Participants were randomized to receive one of three consent and data-sharing scenarios.
RESULTS: In total, 90,000 surveys were mailed and 13,000 individuals responded (15.8% response rate). 5737 respondents were parents of minor children. Overall, 55% (95% confidence interval 50-59%) of parents were willing to enroll their youngest minor child in a hypothetical biobank; willingness did not differ between consent and data-sharing scenarios. Lower educational attainment, higher religiosity, lower trust, worries about privacy, and attitudes about benefits, concerns, and information needs were independently associated with less willingness to allow their child to participate. Of parents who were willing to participate themselves, 25% were not willing to allow their child to participate. Being willing to participate but not willing to allow one's child to participate was independently associated with multiple factors, including race, lower educational attainment, lower annual household income, public health care insurance, and higher religiosity.
CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-five percent of parents were willing to allow their youngest minor child to participate in a hypothetical biobank. Building trust, protecting privacy, and addressing attitudes may increase enrollment and diversity in pediatric biobanks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobank; biorepository; broad consent; data sharing; informed consent; pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30240342      PMCID: PMC6354766          DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1505783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  22 in total

Review 1.  Translational research in pediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking.

Authors:  Alayne R Brisson; Doreen Matsui; Michael J Rieder; Douglas D Fraser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Paediatric biobanks: opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank.

Authors:  Elena Salvaterra; Federica Locatelli; Sandra Strazzer; Renato Borgatti; Grazia D'angelo; Leonardo Lenzi
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.

Authors:  Alejandro Hoberman; Nader Shaikh; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Diana H Kearney; D Kathleen Colborn; Michelle L Kienholz; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Ron Keren; Myra A Carpenter; Saul P Greenfield; Hans G Pohl; Ranjiv Mathews; Marva Moxey-Mims; Russell W Chesney
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Not without my permission: parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research.

Authors:  B A Tarini; A Goldenberg; D Singer; S J Clark; A Butchart; M M Davis
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank.

Authors:  Alon B Neidich; Josh W Joseph; Carole Ober; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa Leroy; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 9.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Saskia C Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi Zinberg; Melissa A Basford; Murray Brilliant; David J Carey; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; John J Connolly; David Crosslin; Joshua C Denny; Carlos J Gallego; Jonathan L Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John Harley; Gail P Jarvik; Isaac Kohane; Iftikhar J Kullo; Eric B Larson; Catherine McCarty; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Maureen E Smith; Erwin P Böttinger; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Participation in Biospecimen Research among Parents of Youth with Mental Health Conditions.

Authors:  Ashli A Owen-Smith; Musu M Sesay; Frances L Lynch; Maria Massolo; Hilda Cerros; Lisa A Croen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Caregiver Perspectives on Informed Consent for a Pediatric Learning Healthcare System Model of Care.

Authors:  A E Pritchard; T A Zabel; L A Jacobson; E Jones; C Holingue; L G Kalb
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Attitudes of Costa Rican individuals towards donation of personal genetic data for research.

Authors:  Gabriela Chavarria-Soley; Fernanda Francis-Cartin; Fabiola Jimenez-Gonzalez; Alejandro Ávila-Aguirre; Maria Jose Castro-Gomez; Lauren Robarts; Anna Middleton; Henriette Raventós
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study.

Authors:  Clara Lajonchere; Arash Naeim; Sarah Dry; Neil Wenger; David Elashoff; Sitaram Vangala; Antonia Petruse; Maryam Ariannejad; Clara Magyar; Liliana Johansen; Gabriela Werre; Maxwell Kroloff; Daniel Geschwind
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.

Authors:  Jude O Igumbor; Edna N Bosire; Marta Vicente-Crespo; Ehimario U Igumbor; Uthman A Olalekan; Tobias F Chirwa; Sam M Kinyanjui; Catherine Kyobutungi; Sharon Fonn
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-08-23

6.  Biological sample donation and informed consent for neurobiobanking: Evidence from a community survey in Ghana and Nigeria.

Authors:  Arti Singh; Oyedunni Arulogun; Joshua Akinyemi; Michelle Nichols; Benedict Calys-Tagoe; Babatunde Ojebuyi; Carolyn Jenkins; Reginald Obiako; Albert Akpalu; Fred Sarfo; Kolawole Wahab; Adeniyi Sunday; Lukman F Owolabi; Muyiwa Adigun; Ibukun Afolami; Olorunyomi Olorunsogbon; Mayowa Ogunronbi; Ezinne Sylvia Melikam; Ruth Laryea; Shadrack Asibey; Wisdom Oguike; Lois Melikam; Abdullateef Sule; Musibau A Titiloye; Isah Suleiman Yahaya; Abiodun Bello; Rajesh N Kalaria; Ayodele Jegede; Mayowa Owolabi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Rufus Akinyemi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Paediatric biobanking for health: The ethical, legal, and societal landscape.

Authors:  Sara Casati; Bridget Ellul; Michaela Th Mayrhofer; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Elodie Caboux; Zisis Kozlakidis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-27

8.  Pediatric biorepository participation during the COVID-19 pandemic: predictors of enrollment and biospecimen donation.

Authors:  Anne M Neilan; Anisha Tyagi; Yao Tong; Eva J Farkas; Madeleine D Burns; Allison Fialkowski; Grace Park; Margot Hardcastle; Elizabeth Gootkind; Ingrid V Bassett; Fatma M Shebl; Lael M Yonker
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  The Role of Electronic Health Records in Advancing Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Jodell E Linder; Lisa Bastarache; Jacob J Hughey; Josh F Peterson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 9.340

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.