Literature DB >> 30239725

Prediction of slaughter age in pigs and assessment of the predictive value of phenotypic and genetic information using random forest.

Ahmad Alsahaf1, George Azzopardi1, Bart Ducro2, Egiel Hanenberg3, Roel F Veerkamp2, Nicolai Petkov1.   

Abstract

The weight of a pig and the rate of its growth are key elements in pig production. In particular, predicting future growth is extremely useful, since it can help in determining feed costs, pen space requirements, and the age at which a pig reaches a desired slaughter weight. However, making these predictions is challenging, due to the natural variation in how individual pigs grow, and the different causes of this variation. In this paper, we used machine learning, namely random forest (RF) regression, for predicting the age at which the slaughter weight of 120 kg is reached. Additionally, we used the variable importance score from RF to quantify the importance of different types of input data for that prediction. Data of 32,979 purebred Large White pigs were provided by Topigs Norsvin, consisting of phenotypic data, estimated breeding values (EBVs), along with pedigree and pedigree-genetic relationships. Moreover, we presented a 2-step data reduction procedure, based on random projections (RPs) and principal component analysis (PCA), to extract features from the pedigree and genetic similarity matrices for use as inputs in the prediction models. Our results showed that relevant phenotypic features were the most effective in predicting the output (age at 120 kg), explaining approximately 62% of its variance (i.e., R2 = 0.62). Estimated breeding value, pedigree, or pedigree-genetic features interchangeably explain 2% of additional variance when added to the phenotypic features, while explaining, respectively, 38%, 39%, and 34% of the variance when used separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30239725      PMCID: PMC6276566          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of Gompertz and neural network models of broiler growth.

Authors:  W B Roush; W A Dozier; S L Branton
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Fuzzy ensemble clustering based on random projections for DNA microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Avogadri; Giorgio Valentini
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  A Legarra; I Aguilar; I Misztal
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Enhancing interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features: application to a RBM-Random Forest system on brain lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Sérgio Pereira; Raphael Meier; Richard McKinley; Roland Wiest; Victor Alves; Carlos A Silva; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Improving the explainability of Random Forest classifier - user centered approach.

Authors:  Dragutin Petkovic; Russ Altman; Mike Wong; Arthur Vigil
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2018

6.  Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Saleh Shahinfar; David Page; Jerry Guenther; Victor Cabrera; Paul Fricke; Kent Weigel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Random Forests approach for identifying additive and epistatic single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with residual feed intake in dairy cattle.

Authors:  C Yao; D M Spurlock; L E Armentano; C D Page; M J VandeHaar; D M Bickhart; K A Weigel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study.

Authors:  Hongjian Li; Kwong-Sak Leung; Man-Hon Wong; Pedro J Ballester
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Spatial analysis and characteristics of pig farming in Thailand.

Authors:  Weerapong Thanapongtharm; Catherine Linard; Pornpiroon Chinson; Suwicha Kasemsuwan; Marjolein Visser; Andrea E Gaughan; Michael Epprech; Timothy P Robinson; Marius Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.741

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Live Weight of Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire Pigs.

Authors:  Alexey Ruchay; Svetlana Gritsenko; Evgenia Ermolova; Alexander Bochkarev; Sergey Ermolov; Hao Guo; Andrea Pezzuolo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Boosted trees to predict pneumonia, growth, and meat percentage of growing-finishing pigs1.

Authors:  Herman Mollenhorst; Bart J Ducro; Karel H De Greef; Ina Hulsegge; Claudia Kamphuis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.