Literature DB >> 24290820

Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms.

Saleh Shahinfar1, David Page2, Jerry Guenther3, Victor Cabrera3, Paul Fricke3, Kent Weigel3.   

Abstract

When making the decision about whether or not to breed a given cow, knowledge about the expected outcome would have an economic impact on profitability of the breeding program and net income of the farm. The outcome of each breeding can be affected by many management and physiological features that vary between farms and interact with each other. Hence, the ability of machine learning algorithms to accommodate complex relationships in the data and missing values for explanatory variables makes these algorithms well suited for investigation of reproduction performance in dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to develop a user-friendly and intuitive on-farm tool to help farmers make reproduction management decisions. Several different machine learning algorithms were applied to predict the insemination outcomes of individual cows based on phenotypic and genotypic data. Data from 26 dairy farms in the Alta Genetics (Watertown, WI) Advantage Progeny Testing Program were used, representing a 10-yr period from 2000 to 2010. Health, reproduction, and production data were extracted from on-farm dairy management software, and estimated breeding values were downloaded from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (Beltsville, MD) database. The edited data set consisted of 129,245 breeding records from primiparous Holstein cows and 195,128 breeding records from multiparous Holstein cows. Each data point in the final data set included 23 and 25 explanatory variables and 1 binary outcome for of 0.756 ± 0.005 and 0.736 ± 0.005 for primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively. The naïve Bayes algorithm, Bayesian network, and decision tree algorithms showed somewhat poorer classification performance. An information-based variable selection procedure identified herd average conception rate, incidence of ketosis, number of previous (failed) inseminations, days in milk at breeding, and mastitis as the most effective explanatory variables in predicting pregnancy outcome.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cattle; machine learning; reproductive management

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290820     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of slaughter age in pigs and assessment of the predictive value of phenotypic and genetic information using random forest.

Authors:  Ahmad Alsahaf; George Azzopardi; Bart Ducro; Egiel Hanenberg; Roel F Veerkamp; Nicolai Petkov
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Integrating diverse data sources to predict disease risk in dairy cattle-a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Jana Lasser; Caspar Matzhold; Christa Egger-Danner; Birgit Fuerst-Waltl; Franz Steininger; Thomas Wittek; Peter Klimek
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Using Sensor Data to Detect Lameness and Mastitis Treatment Events in Dairy Cows: A Comparison of Classification Models.

Authors:  Christian Post; Christian Rietz; Wolfgang Büscher; Ute Müller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Physiological characteristics and effects on fertility of the first follicular wave dominant follicle in cattle.

Authors:  Ryotaro Miura
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 5.  Over 20 Years of Machine Learning Applications on Dairy Farms: A Comprehensive Mapping Study.

Authors:  Philip Shine; Michael D Murphy
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  High Precision Classification of Resting and Eating Behaviors of Cattle by Using a Collar-Fitted Triaxial Accelerometer Sensor.

Authors:  Kim Margarette Corpuz Nogoy; Sun-Il Chon; Ji-Hwan Park; Saraswathi Sivamani; Dong-Hoon Lee; Seong Ho Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Boosted trees to predict pneumonia, growth, and meat percentage of growing-finishing pigs1.

Authors:  Herman Mollenhorst; Bart J Ducro; Karel H De Greef; Ina Hulsegge; Claudia Kamphuis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.