Literature DB >> 29289703

Enhancing interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features: application to a RBM-Random Forest system on brain lesion segmentation.

Sérgio Pereira1, Raphael Meier2, Richard McKinley3, Roland Wiest4, Victor Alves5, Carlos A Silva6, Mauricio Reyes7.   

Abstract

Machine learning systems are achieving better performances at the cost of becoming increasingly complex. However, because of that, they become less interpretable, which may cause some distrust by the end-user of the system. This is especially important as these systems are pervasively being introduced to critical domains, such as the medical field. Representation Learning techniques are general methods for automatic feature computation. Nevertheless, these techniques are regarded as uninterpretable "black boxes". In this paper, we propose a methodology to enhance the interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features. The proposed system is composed of a Restricted Boltzmann Machine for unsupervised feature learning, and a Random Forest classifier, which are combined to jointly consider existing correlations between imaging data, features, and target variables. We define two levels of interpretation: global and local. The former is devoted to understanding if the system learned the relevant relations in the data correctly, while the later is focused on predictions performed on a voxel- and patient-level. In addition, we propose a novel feature importance strategy that considers both imaging data and target variables, and we demonstrate the ability of the approach to leverage the interpretability of the obtained representation for the task at hand. We evaluated the proposed methodology in brain tumor segmentation and penumbra estimation in ischemic stroke lesions. We show the ability of the proposed methodology to unveil information regarding relationships between imaging modalities and extracted features and their usefulness for the task at hand. In both clinical scenarios, we demonstrate that the proposed methodology enhances the interpretability of automatically learned features, highlighting specific learning patterns that resemble how an expert extracts relevant data from medical images.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interpretability; Machine learning; Representation learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29289703     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  14 in total

1.  Prediction of slaughter age in pigs and assessment of the predictive value of phenotypic and genetic information using random forest.

Authors:  Ahmad Alsahaf; George Azzopardi; Bart Ducro; Egiel Hanenberg; Roel F Veerkamp; Nicolai Petkov
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  On the Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Mauricio Reyes; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Carlos A Silva; Fried-Michael Dahlweid; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Ronald M Summers; Roland Wiest
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-05-27

3.  A 3-Gene Random Forest Model to Diagnose Non-obstructive Azoospermia Based on Transcription Factor-Related Henes.

Authors:  Ranran Zhou; Jingjing Liang; Qi Chen; Hu Tian; Cheng Yang; Cundong Liu
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 3. Performance Metrics.

Authors:  Shahriar Faghani; Bardia Khosravi; Kuan Zhang; Mana Moassefi; Jaidip Manikrao Jagtap; Fred Nugen; Sanaz Vahdati; Shiba P Kuanar; Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi; Yashbir Singh; Diana V Vera Garcia; Pouria Rouzrokh; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Survey.

Authors:  Feng-Lei Fan; Jinjun Xiong; Mengzhou Li; Ge Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

6.  Classification of early-MCI patients from healthy controls using evolutionary optimization of graph measures of resting-state fMRI, for the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative.

Authors:  Jafar Zamani; Ali Sadr; Amir-Homayoun Javadi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Haomin Chen; Catalina Gomez; Chien-Ming Huang; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-10-19

8.  Pre-treatment ADC image-based random forest classifier for identifying resistant rectal adenocarcinoma to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Ze-Kun Jiang; Li-Heng Liu; Meng-Su Zeng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Ahmed Hosny; Matthew B Schabath; Maryellen L Giger; Nicolai J Birkbak; Alireza Mehrtash; Tavis Allison; Omar Arnaout; Christopher Abbosh; Ian F Dunn; Raymond H Mak; Rulla M Tamimi; Clare M Tempany; Charles Swanton; Udo Hoffmann; Lawrence H Schwartz; Robert J Gillies; Raymond Y Huang; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  ISLES 2016 and 2017-Benchmarking Ischemic Stroke Lesion Outcome Prediction Based on Multispectral MRI.

Authors:  Stefan Winzeck; Arsany Hakim; Richard McKinley; José A A D S R Pinto; Victor Alves; Carlos Silva; Maxim Pisov; Egor Krivov; Mikhail Belyaev; Miguel Monteiro; Arlindo Oliveira; Youngwon Choi; Myunghee Cho Paik; Yongchan Kwon; Hanbyul Lee; Beom Joon Kim; Joong-Ho Won; Mobarakol Islam; Hongliang Ren; David Robben; Paul Suetens; Enhao Gong; Yilin Niu; Junshen Xu; John M Pauly; Christian Lucas; Mattias P Heinrich; Luis C Rivera; Laura S Castillo; Laura A Daza; Andrew L Beers; Pablo Arbelaezs; Oskar Maier; Ken Chang; James M Brown; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Greg Zaharchuk; Roland Wiest; Mauricio Reyes
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.