Oluwarotimi S Nettey1, Austin J Walker1, Mary Kate Keeter1, Ashima Singal1, Aishwarya Nugooru1, Iman K Martin2, Maria Ruden3, Pooja Gogana1, Michael A Dixon1, Tijani Osuma4, Courtney M P Hollowell5, Roohollah Sharifi6, Marin Sekosan7, Ximing Yang8, William J Catalona1, Andre Kajdacsy-Balla9, Virgilia Macias9, Rick A Kittles10, Adam B Murphy11. 1. Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. 4. Ross University School of Medicine, Miramar, FL. 5. Division of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL. 6. Section of Urology, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 7. Department of Pathology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL. 8. Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 9. Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 10. Division of Health Equities, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA. 11. Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Section of Urology, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: a-murphy2@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Studies have linked Black race to prostate cancer (CaP) risk but most fail to account for established risk factors such as 5-ARI use, prostate volume, socioeconomic status, and hospital setting. We assess whether Black race remains associated with CaP and Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP, after adjusting for clinical setting and socioeconomic and clinical factors at prostate biopsy, with a focus on men aged 40-54 years, who may be excluded from current screening guidelines. METHODS: We recruited 564 men age 40-79 undergoing initial prostate biopsy for abnormal PSA or digital rectal examination (DRE) from three publicly funded and two private hospitals from 2009-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the associations between hospital type, race, West African Ancestry (WAA), clinical, and sociodemographic risk factors with CaP diagnosis and Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP. Given changes in CaP screening recommendations, we also assess the multivariate analyses for men aged 40-54. RESULTS: Black and White men had similar age, BMI, and prostate volume. Black men had higher PSA (8.10 ng/mL vs. 5.63 ng/mL) and PSA density (0.22 ng/mL/cm3 vs. 0.15 ng/mL/cm3, all p < 0.001). Blacks had higher frequency of CaP (63.1% vs. 41.5%, p<0.001) and Gleason ≥3+4 CaP relative to Whites in both public (27.7% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) and private (48.4% vs 21.6%, p = 0.002) settings. In models adjusted for age, first degree family history, prostate volume, 5-ARI use, hospital type, income, marital and educational status, Black race was independently associated with overall CaP diagnosis (OR = 2.13, p = 0.002). There was a significant multiplicative interaction with Black race and abnormal DRE for Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP (OR = 2.93, p = 0.01). WAA was not predictive of overall or significant CaP among Black men. Black race (OR = 5.66, p = 0.02) and family history (OR = 4.98, p = 0.01) were independently positively associated with overall CaP diagnosis for men aged 40 to 54. CONCLUSIONS: Black race is independently associated with CaP and Gleason ≥3+4 CaP after accounting for clinical and socioeconomic risk factors including clinical setting and WAA, and has a higher odds ratio of CaP diagnosis in younger men. Further investigation into optimizing screening in Black men aged 40 to 54 is warranted.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Studies have linked Black race to prostate cancer (CaP) risk but most fail to account for established risk factors such as 5-ARI use, prostate volume, socioeconomic status, and hospital setting. We assess whether Black race remains associated with CaP and Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP, after adjusting for clinical setting and socioeconomic and clinical factors at prostate biopsy, with a focus on men aged 40-54 years, who may be excluded from current screening guidelines. METHODS: We recruited 564 men age 40-79 undergoing initial prostate biopsy for abnormal PSA or digital rectal examination (DRE) from three publicly funded and two private hospitals from 2009-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the associations between hospital type, race, West African Ancestry (WAA), clinical, and sociodemographic risk factors with CaP diagnosis and Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP. Given changes in CaP screening recommendations, we also assess the multivariate analyses for men aged 40-54. RESULTS: Black and White men had similar age, BMI, and prostate volume. Black men had higher PSA (8.10 ng/mL vs. 5.63 ng/mL) and PSA density (0.22 ng/mL/cm3 vs. 0.15 ng/mL/cm3, all p < 0.001). Blacks had higher frequency of CaP (63.1% vs. 41.5%, p<0.001) and Gleason ≥3+4 CaP relative to Whites in both public (27.7% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) and private (48.4% vs 21.6%, p = 0.002) settings. In models adjusted for age, first degree family history, prostate volume, 5-ARI use, hospital type, income, marital and educational status, Black race was independently associated with overall CaP diagnosis (OR = 2.13, p = 0.002). There was a significant multiplicative interaction with Black race and abnormal DRE for Gleason ≥3 + 4 CaP (OR = 2.93, p = 0.01). WAA was not predictive of overall or significant CaP among Black men. Black race (OR = 5.66, p = 0.02) and family history (OR = 4.98, p = 0.01) were independently positively associated with overall CaP diagnosis for men aged 40 to 54. CONCLUSIONS: Black race is independently associated with CaP and Gleason ≥3+4 CaP after accounting for clinical and socioeconomic risk factors including clinical setting and WAA, and has a higher odds ratio of CaP diagnosis in younger men. Further investigation into optimizing screening in Black men aged 40 to 54 is warranted.
Authors: Bernard Kwabi-Addo; Songping Wang; Woonbok Chung; Jaroslav Jelinek; Steven R Patierno; Bi-Dar Wang; Ramez Andrawis; Norman H Lee; Victor Apprey; Jean-Pierre Issa; Michael Ittmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brent V Yanke; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Walter J Simoneaux; Dennis D Venable; Isaac J Powell; James A Eastham Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mark D Tyson; Paul E Andrews; David A Etzioni; Robert G Ferrigni; Mitchell R Humphreys; Scott K Swanson; Erik K Castle Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.344
Authors: Alexis R Gaines; Elizabeth L Turner; Patricia G Moorman; Stephen J Freedland; Christopher J Keto; Megan E McPhail; Delores J Grant; Adriana C Vidal; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Amr Mahran; Kirtishri Mishra; Laura Bukavina; Fredrick Schumacher; Anna Quian; Christina Buzzy; Carvell T Nguyen; Vikas Gulani; Lee E Ponsky Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Karriem Watson; Joanna Buscemi; Marian Fitzgibbon; Marcus Murray; Adam Murphy; Michael Abern; Peter Gann; Josef Ben Levi; James Stinson; Michael Diefenbach; Robert A Winn Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Shannalee R Martinez; Evelyn S Sanchez-Hernandez; Herbert C Ruckle; Frankis G Almaguel; Mariana C Stern; Lisa R Roberts; David R Williams; Susanne Montgomery; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Cancer Health Disparities Date: 2020
Authors: William E Grizzle; Rick A Kittles; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Ebony Shah; George W Adams; Mark S DeGuenther; Peter N Kolettis; Jeffrey W Nix; James E Bryant; Ravi Chinsky; James E Kearns; Kerry Dehimer; Norma Terrin; Hong Chang; Sandra M Gaston Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Kimberly R Jenkins; Taofik Oyekunle; Lauren E Howard; Emily K Wiggins; Stephen J Freedland; Emma H Allott Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kosj Yamoah; Kyung Min Lee; Shivanshu Awasthi; Patrick R Alba; Cristina Perez; Tori R Anglin-Foote; Brian Robison; Anthony Gao; Scott L DuVall; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Yu-Ning Wong; Sarah C Markt; Brent S Rose; Ryan Burri; Carrie Wang; Okoduwa Aboiralor; Angelina K Fink; Nicholas G Nickols; Julie A Lynch; Isla P Garraway Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-01-04