Literature DB >> 30855080

Society of Behavior Medicine (SBM) Urges Congress to Ensure Affordable Care Act Coverage of Prostate Cancer Screening Support Services for High-Risk Men.

Karriem Watson1, Joanna Buscemi1,2, Marian Fitzgibbon1, Marcus Murray3, Adam Murphy4, Michael Abern1, Peter Gann1, Josef Ben Levi5, James Stinson1, Michael Diefenbach6, Robert A Winn1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) disproportionately affects African American men. Early detection reduces risk of mortality. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued an updated recommendation statement on serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)-based screening for PCa. Specifically, in 2012, the USPSTF recommended against PSA-based screening due to risk for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. However, the updated 2018 guidelines recommend consideration of screening for certain at risk men and revised the recommendation rating from "D" to "C." This new guideline recommends providers to educate high-risk men on the benefits and harms of PSA-based PCa screening so that they can make an informed decision. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes provisions of service coverage for patient navigators who can help patients decide whether screening is appropriate, given potential risks and benefits, and training of health care providers in shared-decision regarding screening/treatment. These services can be utilized to support health care providers to better adhere to the new guideline. However, recommendations that are given a C rating or lower are not consistently reimbursed through many plans, including those offered through the ACA marketplace. The Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) supports the USPSTF guideline for the consideration of prostate cancer screening for high-risk men between the ages of 55 and 69. SBM encourages policymakers to include provisions for coverage of patient navigation services in the ACA to facilitate shared decision-making between providers and patients regarding screening. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health equity; Prostate cancer; Screening; Shared decision-making

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30855080      PMCID: PMC7237538          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  2 in total

1.  Self-reported Black race predicts significant prostate cancer independent of clinical setting and clinical and socioeconomic risk factors.

Authors:  Oluwarotimi S Nettey; Austin J Walker; Mary Kate Keeter; Ashima Singal; Aishwarya Nugooru; Iman K Martin; Maria Ruden; Pooja Gogana; Michael A Dixon; Tijani Osuma; Courtney M P Hollowell; Roohollah Sharifi; Marin Sekosan; Ximing Yang; William J Catalona; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Virgilia Macias; Rick A Kittles; Adam B Murphy
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Do African-American men need separate prostate cancer screening guidelines?

Authors:  Divya Shenoy; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Allen M Chen; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.