Literature DB >> 23587510

Marital status and prostate cancer outcomes.

Mark D Tyson1, Paul E Andrews, David A Etzioni, Robert G Ferrigni, Mitchell R Humphreys, Scott K Swanson, Erik K Castle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the influence of marriage on the survival outcomes of men diagnosed with prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 115,922 prostate cancer cases reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2003. Multivariate Cox regression techniques were used to study the relationship of marital status and prostate cancer-specific and overall mortality.
RESULTS: Married men comprised 78% of the cohort (n = 91,490) while unmarried men (single, divorced, widowed, and separated) comprised 22% of the cohort (n = 24,432). Married men were younger (66.4 versus 67.8 years, p < 0.0001), more likely to be white (85% versus 76%, p < 0.0001), presented with lower tumor grades (68% are well or moderately differentiated versus 62%, p < 0.0001) and at earlier clinical stages (41% AJCC stage I/II versus 37%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that unmarried men had a 40% increase in the relative risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.40; CI 1.35-1.44; p < 0.0001), and a 51% increase in overall mortality (HR 1.51; CI 1.48-1.54; p < 0.0001), even when controlling for age, AJCC stage, tumor grade, race and median household income. Furthermore, the 5 year disease-specific survival rates for married men was 89.1% compared to 80.5% for unmarried men (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Marital status is an independent predictor of prostate cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality in men with prostate cancer. Unmarried men have a higher risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality compared to married men of similar age, race, stage, and tumor grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23587510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  25 in total

1.  Marital status and work-related health limitation: a longitudinal study of young adult and middle-aged Americans.

Authors:  Celia C Lo; Tyrone C Cheng; Gaynell M Simpson
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Self-reported Black race predicts significant prostate cancer independent of clinical setting and clinical and socioeconomic risk factors.

Authors:  Oluwarotimi S Nettey; Austin J Walker; Mary Kate Keeter; Ashima Singal; Aishwarya Nugooru; Iman K Martin; Maria Ruden; Pooja Gogana; Michael A Dixon; Tijani Osuma; Courtney M P Hollowell; Roohollah Sharifi; Marin Sekosan; Ximing Yang; William J Catalona; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Virgilia Macias; Rick A Kittles; Adam B Murphy
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Regional trends in average years of potential life lost (AYPLL) secondary to prostate cancer deaths among Caucasians and African Americans treated by surgery or radiation.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Milan Bimali; Mahmoud I Khalil; Ehab Eltahawy; LJoseph Su; Nabil K Bissada; Rodney Davis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The association of marital status and mortality among men with early-stage prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: insight into post-prostatectomy survival strategies.

Authors:  Saira Khan; Kenneth G Nepple; Adam S Kibel; Gurdarshan Sandhu; Dorina Kallogjeri; Seth Strope; Robert Grubb; Kathleen Y Wolin; Siobhan Sutcliffe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Contributions of Social Factors to Disparities in Prostate Cancer Risk Profiles among Black Men and Non-Hispanic White Men with Prostate Cancer in California.

Authors:  David J Press; Salma Shariff-Marco; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Diane Lauderdale; Adam B Murphy; Pushkar P Inamdar; Mindy C DeRouen; Ann S Hamilton; Juan Yang; Katherine Lin; Donald Hedeker; Christopher A Haiman; Iona Cheng; Scarlett Lin Gomez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium.

Authors:  Charlotte Salmon; Lixin Song; Kenneth Muir; Nora Pashayan; Alison M Dunning; Jyotsna Batra; Suzanne Chambers; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; Jong Y Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Olivier Cussenot; Géraldine Cancel-Tassin; Florence Menegaux; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Manolis Kogevinas; Javier Llorca; Radka Kaneva; Chavdar Slavov; Azad Razack; Jasmine Lim; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Jose Esteban Castelao; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind A Eeles; Marie-Élise Parent
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Surgery associated with increased survival compared to radiation in clinically localized Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer: a SEER analysis.

Authors:  Amy Nemirovsky; Hubert Huang; Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria; Michael Naslund; Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Living alone as a risk factor for cancer incidence, case-fatality and all-cause mortality: A nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Marko Elovainio; Sonja Lumme; Martti Arffman; Kristiina Manderbacka; Eero Pukkala; Christian Hakulinen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  The impact of marital status at diagnosis on cancer survival in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Rong-Liang Shi; Ning Qu; Zhong-Wu Lu; Tian Liao; Yi Gao; Qing-Hai Ji
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Incidence and mortality trends of metastatic prostate cancer: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

Authors:  Aaron C Zhang; Rehana Rasul; Anne Golden; Michael A Feuerstein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.