| Literature DB >> 30236158 |
Weibing Xun1,2, Ruirui Yan3, Yi Ren1, Dongyan Jin3, Wu Xiong1, Guishan Zhang2, Zhongli Cui1, Xiaoping Xin4, Ruifu Zhang5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Grazing is a major modulator of biodiversity and productivity in grasslands. However, our understanding of grazing-induced changes in below-ground communities, processes, and soil productivity is limited. Here, using a long-term enclosed grazing meadow steppe, we investigated the impacts of grazing on the soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover, the microbial community composition, resistance and activity under seasonal changes, and the microbial contributions to soil productivity.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle grazing; Microbial composition; SOC-decomposition enzymatic activity; Soil incubation; Soil productivity; Temperate meadow steppe
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30236158 PMCID: PMC6149009 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0544-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1a Lg-transformed bacterial abundance, b Lg-transformed fungal abundance, and c bacteria/fungi ratio at all grazing intensities. Statistical analyses were performed independently for bacterial abundance, fungal abundance, and bacteria/fungi ratio using Duncan’s multiple comparison test. The results were shown with letters a to c
Fig. 2a Bacterial and fungal α-diversity (Shannon index) in June and August. Statistical analyses were performed independently for Shannon diversity at two seasons using Duncan’s multiple comparison test. The results were shown with colored letters a to c. b Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis for bacterial and fungal communities
Fig. 3Seasonal variations of normalized OTU abundances between June and August for every grazing intensity. a Seasonal variations of bacterial community in G0. b Seasonal variations of bacterial community in G2. c Seasonal variations of bacterial community in G4. d Seasonal variations of bacterial community in G8. e Seasonal variations of fungal community in G0. f Seasonal variations of fungal community in G2. g Seasonal variations of fungal community in G4. h Seasonal variations of fungal community in G8
Spearman’s rank correlations of SOC-decomposing enzyme activities with bacterial and fungal abundances
| Labile-SOC decomposition → recalcitrant-SOC decomposition | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertase | Maltase | Amylase | β-glucosidase | Xylanase | Cellulase | Pectinesterase | |
| Bacterial abundance (lg) | 0.600 (< 0.001) | 0.657 (< 0.001) | 0.597 (0.019) | 0.628 (0.021) | 0.257 (0.035) | 0.227 (n.s.) | 0.262 (n.s.) |
| Fungal abundance (lg) | 0.038 (n.s.) | 0.167 (n.s.) | 0.286 (n.s.) | 0.585 (0.015) | 0.742 (< 0.001) | 0.659 (0.009) | 0.757 (< 0.001) |
lg log10 transformation, n.s. not significant
Fig. 4Normally distributed microbial activity under various incubation conditions. The position and size of the rectangle indicate activity and stability. The right-most rectangle indicates higher activity. The smaller-sized rectangle indicates more stable activity. Only the significantly correlated activities and microbial abundances were considered for calculation
Spearman’s rank correlations of microbial activity with microbial diversity, abundance, soil pH, and SOC concentration (estimated using Mantel tests)
| Bacterial activitya (Labile-SOC-degrading efficiency) | Fungal activityb (Recalcitrant-SOC-degrading efficiency) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mantel statistic | Significance ( | Mantel statistic | Significance ( | |
| Bacterial α-diversity | 0.625 | 0.045 | – | – |
| Bacterial γ-diversity | 0.692 | 0.034 | ||
| Bacterial β-diversity | 0.794 | 0.002 | – | – |
| qPCR (bacteria) | 0.518 | 0.053 | – | – |
| Fungal α-diversity | – | – | 0.571 | 0.039 |
| Fungal γ-diversity | 0.483 | 0.044 | ||
| Fungal β-diversity | – | – | 0.267 | 0.227 |
| qPCR (fungi) | – | – | 0.829 | 0.001 |
| pH | 0.726 | 0.004 | 0.304 | 0.265 |
| SOC | 0.218 | 0.240 | 0.507 | 0.037 |
aBacterial activity, estimated using the activity of invertase, maltase, and amylase
bFungal activity, estimated using the activity of xylanase, cellulase, and pectinesterase
Fig. 5Linear regression analysis between microbial α-diversity (Shannon index) and SOC concentration (a bacteria; b fungi), average plant biomass accumulation (c bacteria; d fungi), and average livestock biomass accumulation (e bacteria; f fungi)
Fig. 6An overview of the influence of grazing on soil microbial community and soil productivity