Literature DB >> 20550579

The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon-use-efficiency.

Katharina M Keiblinger1, Edward K Hall, Wolfgang Wanek, Ute Szukics, Ieda Hämmerle, Günther Ellersdorfer, Sandra Böck, Joseph Strauss, Katja Sterflinger, Andreas Richter, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern.   

Abstract

The carbon-use-efficiency (CUE) of microorganisms is an important parameter in determining ecosystem-level carbon (C) cycling; however, little is known about how variance in resources affects microbial CUE. To elucidate how resource quantity and resource stoichiometry affect microbial CUE, we cultured four microorganisms - two fungi (Aspergillus nidulans and Trichoderma harzianum) and two bacteria (Pectobacterium carotovorum and Verrucomicrobium spinosum) - under 12 unique C, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) ratios. Whereas the CUE of A. nidulans was strongly affected by C, bacterial CUE was more strongly affected by mineral nutrients (N and P). Specifically, CUE in P. carotovorum was positively correlated with P, while CUE of V. spinosum primarily depended on N. This resulted in a positive relationship between fungal CUE and resource C : nutrient stoichiometry and a negative relationship between bacterial CUE and resource C : nutrient stoichiometry. The difference in the direction of the relationship between CUE and C : nutrient for fungi vs. bacteria was consistent with differences in biomass stoichiometry and suggested that fungi have a higher C demand than bacteria. These results suggest that the links between biomass stoichiometry, resource demand and CUE may provide a mechanism for commonly observed temporal and spatial patterns in microbial community structure and function in natural habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  41 in total

1.  Looking inside the box: using Raman microspectroscopy to deconstruct microbial biomass stoichiometry one cell at a time.

Authors:  Edward K Hall; Gabriel A Singer; Marvin Pölzl; Ieda Hämmerle; Christian Schwarz; Holger Daims; Frank Maixner; Tom J Battin
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Heterotrophic bacteria from an extremely phosphate-poor lake have conditionally reduced phosphorus demand and utilize diverse sources of phosphorus.

Authors:  Mengyin Yao; Felix J Elling; CarriAyne Jones; Sulung Nomosatryo; Christopher P Long; Sean A Crowe; Maciek R Antoniewicz; Kai-Uwe Hinrichs; Julia A Maresca
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Resource stoichiometry shapes community invasion resistance via productivity-mediated species identity effects.

Authors:  Tianjie Yang; Gang Han; Qingjun Yang; Ville-Petri Friman; Shaohua Gu; Zhong Wei; George A Kowalchuk; Yangchun Xu; Qirong Shen; Alexandre Jousset
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Contrasting influence of soil nutrients and microbial community on differently sized basal consumers.

Authors:  J Arie Vonk; Christian Mulder
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-24

5.  Effect of warming and drought on grassland microbial communities.

Authors:  Cody S Sheik; William Howard Beasley; Mostafa S Elshahed; Xuhui Zhou; Yiqi Luo; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  A synoptic survey of microbial respiration, organic matter decomposition, and carbon efflux in U.S. streams and rivers.

Authors:  Brian H Hill; Colleen M Elonen; Alan T Herlihy; Terri M Jicha; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.745

7.  The ecology of heterogeneity: soil bacterial communities and C dynamics.

Authors:  Naoise Nunan; Hannes Schmidt; Xavier Raynaud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Microbial ecoenzyme stoichiometry, nutrient limitation, and organic matter decomposition in wetlands of the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Brian H Hill; Colleen M Elonen; Alan T Herlihy; Terri M Jicha; Gregg Serenbetz
Journal:  Wetl Ecol Manag       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.379

9.  Detrital floc and surface soil microbial biomarker responses to active management of the nutrient impacted Florida everglades.

Authors:  Brent J Bellinger; Scot E Hagerthey; Susan Newman; Mark I Cook
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Soil microbial responses to warming and increased precipitation and their implications for ecosystem C cycling.

Authors:  Naili Zhang; Weixing Liu; Haijun Yang; Xingjun Yu; Jessica L M Gutknecht; Zhe Zhang; Shiqiang Wan; Keping Ma
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.