Literature DB >> 30233934

Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Greger Lønne1,2, Thomas D Cha2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Unlike traditional open laminectomy, minimally invasive decompression (MID) spares the important midline structures of the spine (i.e., the spinous process and the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments). STEP 1 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING: Determine the levels and laterality for the decompression on the basis of the symptoms and findings on the MRI scan. STEP 2 OPERATING ROOM SETUP: Ensure the correct positioning of the patient and the proper setup of the equipment. STEP 3 MARKING THE LEVELS: Use fluoroscopy to localize the level(s) of the stenosis. STEP 4 SKIN INCISION AND TUBE POSITIONING: Ensure the correct placement of the tube. STEP 5 RESECTION OF THE LOWER PART OF THE LAMINA: Use a high-speed drill and Kerrison rongeur to enter the spinal canal. STEP 6 RESECTION OF THE MEDIAL PART OF THE FACET JOINT: Proceed cautiously at the point where the spinal canal is usually narrowest. STEP 7 RESECTION OF THE LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM: Resect the ligamentum flavum piecemeal with a Kerrison rongeur. STEP 8 CROSSOVER TECHNIQUE OPTIONAL: Use the crossover technique to reach across the midline and decompress the contralateral lateral recess (Video 3). STEP 9 CLOSING THE WOUND: Perform a check to be certain that all steps have been completed before closing the skin.
RESULTS: In the study by Lønne et al., the 41 patients managed with MID had significant improvement at 6 weeks and throughout the 2-year observation period7.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 30233934      PMCID: PMC6132610          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  16 in total

1.  Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; John Spears; Robert E Isaacs; John Booher; Robert S Biscup
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-05

Review 2.  Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Farbod Asgarzadie; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Suat Erol Celik; Sevinç Celik; Kamber Göksu; Ayhan Kara; Irfan Ince
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.

Authors:  Mark G Burnett; Sherman C Stein; Ronald H M A Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-07

6.  Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system.

Authors:  Sylvain Palmer; Robert Turner; Rosemary Palmer
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  A prospective study of the incidence and outcomes of incidental dural tears in microendoscopic lumbar decompressive surgery.

Authors:  T Tsutsumimoto; M Yui; M Uehara; H Ohta; H Kosaku; H Misawa
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Ivar Rossvoll; Hege Andresen; Kjersti Storheim; John Anker Zwart; Øystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Wrong-level surgery: A unique problem in spine surgery.

Authors:  John Hsiang
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-04-19

10.  Minimal invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Victor Popov; David G Anderson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  The expression of P16 and S100 associated with elastin degradation and fibrosis of the Ligamentum Flavum hypertrophy.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Shunli Kan; Guang Liu; Zegang Cao; Rusen Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  The correlation between imaging expression of P16 and S100 in hypertrophic ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Yidong Liu; Shunli Kan; Tengfei Zhang; Zehua Jiang; Rusen Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.