Literature DB >> 30233791

The role of automated cytometry in the new era of cancer immunotherapy.

Marco Danova1, Martina Torchio1, Giuditta Comolli2, Andrea Sbrana3, Andrea Antonuzzo3, Giuliano Mazzini4.   

Abstract

The introduction in the clinical practice of several new approaches to cancer immunotherapy has greatly increased the interest in analytical methodologies that can define the immunological profile of patients in the clinical setting. This requires huge effort to obtain reliable monitoring tools that could be used to improve the patient's clinical outcome. The clinical applications of flow cytometry (FCM) in oncology started with the measurement of DNA content for the evaluation of both ploidy and cell cycle profile as potential prognostic parameters in the majority of human solid cancer types. The availability of monoclonal antibodies widely broadened the spectrum of clinical applications of this technique, which rapidly became a fundamental tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of malignant hematological diseases. Among the emerging clinical applications of FCM, the study of minimal residual disease in hematological malignancies, the quantification of blood dendritic cells in various types of tumors, the study of metastatic spread in solid tumors throughout both the analysis of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and the identification and characterization of circulating tumor cells, all appear very promising. More recently, an advanced single cell analysis technique has been developed that combines the precision of mass spectrometry with the unique advantages of FCM. This approach, termed mass cytometry, utilizes antibodies conjugated to heavy metal ions for the analysis of cellular proteins by a mass spectrometer. It provides measurement of over 100 simultaneous cellular parameters in a single sample and has evolved from a promising technology to a high recognized platform for multi-dimensional single-cell analysis. Should a careful standardization of the analytical procedures be reached, both FCM and mass cytometry could effectively become ideal tools for the optimization of new immunotherapeutic approaches in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer immunotherapy; clinical oncology; flow cytometry; mass cytometry

Year:  2018        PMID: 30233791      PMCID: PMC6142305          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  58 in total

1.  Circulating endothelial cells and their apoptotic fraction are mutually independent predictive biomarkers in Bevacizumab-based treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mariangela Manzoni; Sara Mariucci; Sara Delfanti; Bianca Rovati; Monica Ronzoni; Fotios Loupakis; Silvia Brugnatelli; Carmine Tinelli; Eugenio Villa; Alfredo Falcone; Marco Danova
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  GOING WITH THE FLOW.

Authors:  Nathan Blow
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biomarkers Task Force recommendations review.

Authors:  Lisa H Butterfield
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 4.  Applications of Mass Cytometry in Clinical Medicine: The Promise and Perils of Clinical CyTOF.

Authors:  Gregory K Behbehani
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety of Nivolumab (Anti-Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Scott N Gettinger; Leora Horn; Leena Gandhi; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Naiyer A Rizvi; John D Powderly; Rebecca S Heist; Richard D Carvajal; David M Jackman; Lecia V Sequist; David C Smith; Philip Leming; David P Carbone; Mary C Pinder-Schenck; Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Jeffrey A Sosman; Mario Sznol; David F McDermott; Drew M Pardoll; Vindira Sankar; Christoph M Ahlers; Mark Salvati; Jon M Wigginton; Matthew D Hellmann; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok K Gupta; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Biomarkers of response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition.

Authors:  Saman Maleki Vareki; Carmen Garrigós; Ignacio Duran
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Clinical Applications of and Challenges in Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Chang-Peng Wu; Peng Wu; Hua-Fu Zhao; Wen-Lan Liu; Wei-Ping Li
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  Immune monitoring technology primer: flow and mass cytometry.

Authors:  Holden T Maecker; Alexandre Harari
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 10.  Single-cell technologies are revolutionizing the approach to rare cells.

Authors:  Valentina Proserpio; Tapio Lönnberg
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.126

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A Chemical Biology Approach to the Chaperome in Cancer-HSP90 and Beyond.

Authors:  Tony Taldone; Tai Wang; Anna Rodina; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty; Chander S Digwal; Sahil Sharma; Pengrong Yan; Suhasini Joshi; Piyusha P Pagare; Alexander Bolaender; Gail J Roboz; Monica L Guzman; Gabriela Chiosis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Conjunctival HLA-DR Expression and Its Association With Symptoms and Signs in the DREAM Study.

Authors:  Neeta S Roy; Yi Wei; Yinxi Yu; Gui-Shuang Ying; Eric Kuklinski; Brendan Barry; Maureen G Maguire; Reza Dana; Mary Brightwell-Arnold; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 3.  High-dimensional immune-profiling in cancer: implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Samuel Chuah; Valerie Chew
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 4.  Recent advances in mass spectrometry based clinical proteomics: applications to cancer research.

Authors:  Andrew Macklin; Shahbaz Khan; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 5.  Targeting Neoepitopes to Treat Solid Malignancies: Immunosurgery.

Authors:  Eric de Sousa; Joana R Lérias; Antonio Beltran; Georgia Paraschoudi; Carolina Condeço; Jéssica Kamiki; Patrícia Alexandra António; Nuno Figueiredo; Carlos Carvalho; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Zhe Wang; Dário Ligeiro; Martin Rao; Markus Maeurer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.