Literature DB >> 30232618

Long-term outcomes following POEM for non-achalasia motility disorders of the esophagus.

Filippo Filicori1,2, Christy M Dunst3,4, Ahmed Sharata1,2, Walaa F Abdelmoaty1,2, Ahmed M Zihni1,2, Kevin M Reavis1,2, Steven R Demeester1,2, Lee L Swanström1,5,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for symptomatic patients with non-achalasia motility disorders (NAD) such as diffuse esophageal spasm, esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction, and hypercontractile disorder is not well established. POEM has been offered to these patients since it is a less invasive and less morbid procedure but long-term outcomes remain undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of POEM for patients with NAD.
METHODS: Records of 40 consecutive patients undergoing POEM for NAD from May 2011 to January 2016 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative symptom scores, high-resolution manometry, pH testing, and timed barium swallow (TBS) data were collected. Patients were contacted by phone to obtain long-term symptom assessment. Symptoms were assessed using a standardized symptom questionnaire with scores for symptoms graded according to frequency and the Eckardt score.
RESULTS: Ten percent had minor complications with no postoperative sequelae. 90% of patients had significant improvement in their mean Eckardt scores (5.02 vs. 1.12, p < 0.001) at early follow-up. Improvements in chest pain (1.02-0.36, p = 0.001) and dysphagia (2.20 vs. 0.40, p = 0.001) were seen. Significant improvements in manometric pressures and esophageal emptying on TBS were observed across groups. 38% (10/26) of patients had a postoperative pH score > 14.72. Long-term (median 48 months) symptom scores were obtained from 29 (72.5%) patients. 82% of patients (24/29) had sustained symptom improvement. A small increase in the dysphagia scores was reported in the long-term follow-up compared to the immediate postoperative period (0.36-0.89, p = 0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain and dysphagia are effectively palliated with POEM in patients with non-achalasia disorders of the esophagus. Significant improvements are durable in long-term follow-up. Despite earlier reports by our group suggesting possible inferior outcomes from POEM for this difficult group of patients, this study is far more encouraging. POEM should be considered in the treatment of patients with non-achalasia disorders of the esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysphagia; Esophageal outflow obstruction; Hypercontractile esophagus; Long myotomy; Non-cardiac chest pain; POEM

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232618     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6438-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Esophagomyotomy for noncardiac chest pain resulting from diffuse esophageal spasm and related disorders.

Authors:  F H Ellis
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-05-27       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Current medical therapy for esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  S R Achem; B E Kolts
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-05-27       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Jackhammer esophagus: high-resolution manometry and therapeutic approach using peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Authors:  A Kandulski; K-H Fuchs; J Weigt; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for diffuse esophageal spasm.

Authors:  H Minami; H Isomoto; N Yamaguchi; K Ohnita; F Takeshima; H Inoue; K Nakao
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Authors:  An Moonen; Vito Annese; Ann Belmans; Albert J Bredenoord; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Mario Costantini; Bertrand Dousset; J I Elizalde; Uberto Fumagalli; Marianne Gaudric; Antonio Merla; Andre J Smout; Jan Tack; Giovanni Zaninotto; Olivier R Busch; Guy E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Technique of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) of the esophagus (with video).

Authors:  Ahmed Sharata; Ashwin A Kurian; Christy M Dunst; Neil H Bhayani; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predictors of outcome in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dilation.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; C Aignherr; G Bernhard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Comparison of medical and minimally invasive surgical therapy for primary esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  M G Patti; C A Pellegrini; M Arcerito; J Tong; S J Mulvihill; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-06

Review 10.  Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; L A Bradley; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Chandan; Babu Pappu Mohan; Ojasvini Choudhry Chandan; Lokesh Kumar Jha; Harmeet Singh Mashiana; Alexander Todd Hewlett; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  POEM: clinical outcomes beyond 5 years.

Authors:  Sarah C McKay; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed M Sharata; Reid Fletcher; Kevin M Reavis; Daniel Davila Bradley; Steven R DeMeester; Dolores Müller; Brett Parker; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Diagnosis and Management of Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

Authors:  Claire Beveridge; Kristle Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-03

4.  Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Lena Shally; Kashif Saeed; Derek Berglund; Mark Dudash; Katie Frank; Vladan N Obradovic; Anthony T Petrick; David L Diehl; Jon D Gabrielsen; David M Parker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Rena Yadlapati; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 33.883

6.  Outcomes of 100 Patients More Than 4 Years After POEM for Achalasia.

Authors:  Ryan A J Campagna; Arturo Cirera; Amy L Holmstrom; Joseph R Triggs; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 7.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Jie Feng; Raja Waqar Ali; Jin-Yong Hao; Gui-Xiang Kong; Li-Hong Yang; Xiao-Jun Huang
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.230

8.  Morphologic Changes in Esophageal Body Movement During Bolus Transport After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Type III Achalasia.

Authors:  Alex Ju Sung Kim; Sungmoon Ong; Ji Hyun Kim; Hong Sub Lee; Jun Sik Yoon; Dae Young Hur
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations.

Authors:  R A B Oude Nijhuis; G Zaninotto; S Roman; G E Boeckxstaens; P Fockens; M W Langendam; A A Plumb; Ajpm Smout; E M Targarona; A S Trukhmanov; Blam Weusten; Albert J Bredenoord
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.